SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış / 2014 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2

The effect of inter-firm networking activities in Business incubators on newly founded firms’ survival

İşletme kuluçkalarında firmalar arası ağbağlaşma faaliyetlerinin yeni kurulan firmaların hayatta kalabilirliği üzerine etkisi

Onur SUNGUR
Pages
247–259
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the study, it is concluded that there is a significant difference between collaborating firms and non-collaborating firms in terms of their survival rates.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Business incubators are programs that aim to increase the survival rates of newly established firms through various supporting services.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Cooperation and networking between tenant firms have significant effects on the probability of survival.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the study, it is concluded that there is a significant difference between collaborating firms and non-collaborating firms in terms of their survival rates.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Business incubators are programs that aim to increase the survival rates of newly established firms through various supporting services. One of these services is networking activities. Cooperation and networking between tenant firms have significant effects on the probability of survival. In this study, the effects of networking and collaboration activities between tenants firm on firm survival is examined through the lenses of Business Development Centers (ISGEMs). As a result of the study, it is concluded that there is a significant difference between collaborating firms and non-collaborating firms in terms of their survival rates.

Özet

İşletme kuluçkaları uygulamaları, çeşitli destekleyici hizmetler sayesinde yeni kurulan firmaların hayatta kalabilirlik oranla- rını arttırmayı amaçlayan uygulamalardır. Bu hizmetlerden birisi de aracılık/ağbağlaşma faaliyetleridir. Kiracı firmalar arasındaki işbirliği ve ağbağlaşmanın, hayatta kalma olasılığı üzerinde önemli etkisi olmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’de de işletme kuluçkaları olarak uygulanmakta olan İş Geliştirme Merkezleri’nde (İŞGEM) kiracı firmalar arasındaki işbirliği ve ağ- bağlaşma faaliyetlerinin hayatta kalma üzerindeki etkisi araştı- rılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda, işbirliği içerisinde olan firmalar ile işbirliği içerisinde olmayan firmaların hayatta kalma olasılıkları arasında önemli farklılıklar olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SUNGUR, O. (2022). The effect of inter-firm networking activities in Business incubators on newly founded firms’ survival. Ege Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2, 247–259. https://ajindex.com/articles/495362

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Abduh, M., D’Souza, C., Quazi, A. ve Burley, H.T. (2007) “Investigating and Classifying Clients’ Satisfaction with Business Incubator Services” Managing Service Quality, 17(1): 74-91.
  2. Adegbite, O. (2001) “Business Incubators and Small Enterprise Development: The Nigerian Experience” Small Business Economics, 17(3): 157-166.
  3. Aernoudt, R. (2004) “Incubators: Tool for Entrepreneurship?” Small Business Economics, 23(2): 127- 135. Albert, P. ve Gaynor, L. (2001) “Incubators – Growing Up, Moving Out, A Review of the Literature”, CERAM Sophia Antipolis, December 2001.
  4. Allen, D.N. ve Rahman, S. (1985) “Small Business Incubators: A Positive Environment for Entrepreneurship” Journal of Small Business Management, 23(3): 12-22.
  5. Al-Mubaraki, H.M., A-Karaghouli, W. ve Busler, M. (2010) “The Creation of Business Incubators in Supporting Economic Developments” European Mediterranean and Middle Eastern Conference on Information Systems 2010 (EMCIS2010), Nisan 12-13,
  6. Abu Dhabi. Anavatan, A. (2011) “Zaman Bağımlı Cox Regresyonu: Genç Firmaların Hayatta Kalma Başarısı Üzerine Bir Uygulama” Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Antalya, Akdeniz Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Andersson, U., Forsgren, M. ve Holm, U. (2002) “The Strategic Impact of External Networks: Subsidiary Performance and Competence Development in the Multinational Corporation” Strategic Management Journal, 23(11): 979-996.
  7. Bergek, A. ve Norrman, C. (2008) “Incubator Best Practice: A Framework” Technovation, 28(1-2): 20-28.
  8. Bhabra-Remedios, R.K. ve Cornelius, B. (2003) “Cracks in the Egg: Improving Performance Measures in Business Incubator Research”, Small Enterprise Association of Australia and New Zealand 16th Annual Conference, Ekim 28-Ekim 1, Ballarat. Bianchi, P. ve Bellini, N. (1991) “Public Policies for Local Networks of Innovation” Research Policy, 20(5): 487-497.
  9. Birley, S. (1985) “The Role of Networks in the Entrepreneurial Process” Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1): 107-117.
  10. Bollingtoft, A. ve Ulhoi, J.P. (2005) “The Networked Business Incubator – Leveraging Entrepreneurial Agency?” Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2): 265-290.
  11. Brooks, O. (1986) “Economic Development through Entrepreneurship: Incubators and the Incubation Process” Economic Development Review, 4(2): 24-29.
  12. Brüderl, J. ve Preisendörfer, P. (1998) “Network Support and the Success of Newly Founded Businesses” Small Business Economics, 10(3): 213-225.
  13. Carayannis, E.G. ve Von Zedtwitz, M. (2005) “Architecting GloCal (global–loc