Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış / 2014 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3

Tedarik zinciri yönetiminde ilişki kalitesi: Çift yönlü perspektif

Relationship quality in supply chain management: A dyad perspective

Pages
371–381
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Hence, the aim of this study is to investigate and identifythe dimensions of relationship quality for each of the abovementioned process links.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The business performance is significantly affected by the re-lationship between the partners (Lages et al., 2008).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Hence,the quality of the relationship between the members of thesupply chain is vital for the success of the entire chain where ithas a positive effect on profitability (Huntley, 2006) and supplychain performance (Fynes et al., 2008; Mohaghar & Ghasemi,2011).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Hence, the aim of this study is to investigate and identifythe dimensions of relationship quality for each of the abovementioned process links.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The business performance is significantly affected by the re-lationship between the partners (Lages et al., 2008). Hence,the quality of the relationship between the members of thesupply chain is vital for the success of the entire chain where ithas a positive effect on profitability (Huntley, 2006) and supplychain performance (Fynes et al., 2008; Mohaghar & Ghasemi,2011). On the other hand, integration and management ofall process links throughout the supply chain is not possiblebesides, the level of integration may differ among the links orthrough time. Therefore, some links can be referred as morecritical and must be actively managed. As a matter of fact, therelationships and the quality of the relationships within mana-ged, monitored and not managed process links as indicated inthe study of Lambert et al. (1998) are expected to show varian-ces. Hence, the aim of this study is to investigate and identifythe dimensions of relationship quality for each of the abovementioned process links.

Özet

İşletme performansı iş ortaklarının birbiriyle olan ilişkisindenanlamlı ölçüde etkilenmektedir (Lages vd., 2008). Bu sebeple,tedarik zinciri üyelerinin arasında var olan ilişkinin kalitesi, tüm zincirin başarısı için büyük önem teşkil etmekte, zincirin karlılığı (Huntley, 2006) ve performansı (Fynes vd., 2008; Mohaghar ve Ghasemi, 2011) üzerinde olumlu etki yaratmaktadır. Öte yandan, tedarik zinciri boyunca tüm süreç bağlantılarının entegrasyon ve yönetimi mümkün değildir bunun yanısıra, entegrasyon düzeyi, bağlantılar arasında ya da zaman içinde farklılaşabilmektedir. Bu nedenle, bazı bağlantılar daha kritik olarak ifade edilebilir ve bu bağlantılar aktif yönetilmelidir.Dolayısıyla, Lambert ve arkadaşlarının (1998) çalışmasındabelirtildiği üzere, yönetilen, izlenen ve yönetilmeyen süreç bağlantılarındaki ilişki kalitesinin de farklılık göstermesibeklenmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı yukarıda belirtilensüreç bağlantılarının her biri için ilişki kalitesinin boyutlarını araştırmak ve ortaya çıkartmaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

MARCONE, M. R., GREGORI, G. L., TEMPERINI, V., MOSCATELLI, L., ATREK, B. (2022). Tedarik zinciri yönetiminde ilişki kalitesi: Çift yönlü perspektif. Ege Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3, 371–381. https://ajindex.com/articles/495341

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ambrose, E., Marshall, D. ve Lynch, D. (2010) “Buyer Supplier Perspectives on Supply Chain Relationships” International Journal of Operations & Productions Management, 39(12):1269-1290.
  2. Crosby, L.A., Evans, K.R. ve Cowles, D. (1990) “Relationship Quality in Services Selling: An Interpersonal Influence Perspective” The Journal of Marketing, 54(3):68-81.
  3. Dorsch, M.J, Swanson, S.R. ve Kelley, S.W. (1998) “The Role of Relationship Quality in the Stratification of Vendors as Perceived by Customers” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(2):128-142.
  4. Dwyer, E.R. ve Oh, S. (1987) “Output Sector Munificence Effects on the Internal Political Economy of Marketing Channels” Journal of Marketing Research, 24:347-358.
  5. Ellram, L.M. (1992) “International Purchasing Alliances: An Empirical Study”The International Journal of Logistics Management, 3(1):23-36.
  6. Fang, S.R., Chang, Y.S. ve Peng, Y.C. (2011) “Dark Side of Relationships: A Tensions-Based View” Industrial Marketing Management, 40:774-784.
  7. Fynes, B., Voss, C. ve Burca, S. (2005) “The Impact of Supply Chain Relationship Quality on Quality Performance” International Journal of Production Economics, 96:339-354.
  8. Fynes, B., Burca, S. ve Mangan, J. (2008) “The effect of Relationship Characteristics on Relationship Quality and Performance” International Journal of Production Economics, 111:56-69.
  9. Gummesson, E. (1987) “The New Marketing Developing Long-Term Interactive Relationships” Long Range Planning, 20(49):10-20.
  10. Hakkanson, H. ve Snehota, I. (1995) Developing Relationships in Business Networks, London, Routledge. Holmlund, M. (2008) “A Definition, Model, and Empirical Analysis of Business-to-Business Relationship Quality” International Journal of Service Industry Management, 19(1):32-62.
  11. Huntley, J.K. (2006) “Conceptualization and Measurement of Relationship Quality: Linking Relationship Quality to Actual Sales and Recommendation Intention” Industrial Marketing Management, 35:703-714.
  12. Jarvelin, A. ve Lehtinen, U. (1996) “Relationship Quality in Business-to-Business Service Context” Edvardsso et al. (eds.) QUIS 5 Advancing Service Quality, A Global Perspective, Warwick Printing Company Ltd. Kim, W.G., Lee, Y.K. ve Yoo, Y.J. (2006) “Predictors of Relationship Quality and Relationship Outcomes in Luxury Restaurants” Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 30(2):143-169.
  13. Kumar, N., Scheer, L.K. ve Steenkamp, J.B. (1995) “The Effects of Supplier Fairness on Vulnerable Resellers” Journal of Marketing Research, 32