SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış / 2015 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1

Education and Income

Eğitim ve Gelir

Cemil ÇİFTÇİ
Sinem Güler KANGALLI
Pages
141–152
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results indicated that while the impact of mother s educational level on income does not show a significant difference for different points of the distribution; the impact of father s education level on income reaches the highest level in the mid-point (q50) of the distribution, after that point as the father s education level increases, household s income less increases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Education, which enhances human capital s qualification and productivity and increases individual s future earnings, is also one of the most effective political instruments that permanently solves income inequalities problem.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, utilizing Quantile regression techniques in Denizli we analyzed the effect of education level of mother and father on household s income.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results indicated that while the impact of mother s educational level on income does not show a significant difference for different points of the distribution; the impact of father s education level on income reaches the highest level in the mid-point (q50) of the distribution, after that point as the father s education level increases, household s income less increases.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Education, which enhances human capital s qualification and productivity and increases individual s future earnings, is also one of the most effective political instruments that permanently solves income inequalities problem. In this study, utilizing Quantile regression techniques in Denizli we analyzed the effect of education level of mother and father on household s income. Results indicated that while the impact of mother s educational level on income does not show a significant difference for different points of the distribution; the impact of father s education level on income reaches the highest level in the mid-point (q50) of the distribution, after that point as the father s education level increases, household s income less increases.

Özet

Eğitim, beşeri sermayenin niteliğini ve verimliliğini geliştirmesi ve bireylerin gelecekte elde edecekleri geliri artırmasının yanında, aynı zamanda gelir eşitsizlikleri sorununun kalıcı bir biçimde çözümlenmesinde kullanılan en etkin politika araçlarından biridir. Çalışmamızda kantil regresyon tekniği kullanarak 2012 yılında Denizli ilinde anne ve babanın eğitim düzeyinin hanehalkı geliri üzerindeki etkisi analiz edilmektedir. Analiz sonuçlarına göre annenin eğitim düzeyinin gelir üzerindeki etkisi dağılımın farklı noktaları için önemli bir farklılık göstermezken, babanın eğitim seviyesinin gelir üzerindeki etkisi dağılımın orta noktası (q50) için en yüksek seviyesine ulaşırken bu noktadan sonra babanın eğitim seviyesi arttıkça geliri daha az artmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇİFTÇİ, C., KANGALLI, S. G. (2022). Education and Income. Ege Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1, 141–152. https://ajindex.com/articles/495318

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Acemoglu, D. ve Pischke, J.S. (2001) “Changes in The Wage Structure, Family income, and Children’s Education” European Economic Review, 45:890-904.
  2. Alderman, H., Orazem, P. F. ve Paterno, E.M. (2001) “School Quality, School Cost, and the Public/Private School Choices of Low-Income Households in Pakistan” The Journal of Human Resources, 36(2):304-326.
  3. Appleton, S., Song, L. ve Xia, Q. (2014) “Understanding Urban Wage Inequality in China 1988–2008: Evidence from Quantile Analysis” World Development, 62:1-13.
  4. Azam, M. (2012) “Changes in Wage Structure in Urban India, 1983-2004: A Quantile Regression Decomposition” World Development, 40(6):1135–1150. Barro, R.J. (2001) “Human Capital and Growth” The American Economic Review, 91(2):12-17.
  5. Becker, G.S. ve Tomes, N. (1994) “Human Capital and the Rise and Fall of Families,” NBER Chapters, Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education, 3rd Edition,
  6. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Blau, F.D. ve Kahn, L.M. (1996) “International Differences in Male Wage Inequality: Institutions versus Market Forces” The Journal of Political Economy, 104(4):791-837.
  7. Bound, J. ve Johnson, G. (1992) “Changes in the Structure of Wages in the 1980’s: An Evaluation of Alternative Explanations” The American Economic Review, 82(3):371-392.
  8. Buchinsky, M. (1998) “Recent Advances in Quantile Regression Models: A Practical Guideline For Empirical Research” J. Hum. Resour, 33:88-126.
  9. Card, D. (1999) “The Causal Effect of Education on Earnings” Ashenfelter et al (eds) In Handbook of Labor Economics, Amsterdam, Elsevier. Caner, A. ve Okten, C. (2013) “Higher education in Turkey: Subsidizing the rich or the poor?” Economics of Education Review, 35:75-92.
  10. Caner, A. ve Okten, C. (2010) “Risk and career choice: Evidence from Turkey” Economics of Education Review, 29:1060-1075.
  11. Çelik, O. ve Selim, S. (2013) “Temel İnsan Sermayesi Modeli: Türkiye Örneği” EY International Congress on Economics I, October 24-25, Ankara/Turkey. Delaney, L., Harmon, C. ve Redmond, C. (2011) “Parental Education, Grade Attainment and Earnings Expectations Among University Students” Economics of Education Review, 30: 1136-1152.
  12. Duman, A. (2008) “Education and Income Inequality in Turkey: Does Schooling Matter?” Financial Theory and Practice, 32(3):369-385.
  13. Fields, G.S. (1980) “Education and income Distribution in Developing Countries: A Review of The Literature” King, T. (ed.) Education and income: A Background Study For World