SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış / 2015 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1

Decomposition Methods for the Analysis of Energy Consumption in Kyrgyzstan (2002-2011)

Kırgızistan Enerji Tüketiminin Ayrıştırma Yöntemiyle Analizi (2002-2011)

Alper YILMAZ
Aziz BOSTAN
G. Afşin RAVANOĞLU
Pages
39–51
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicate that the primary energy consumption has been increased as a result of production and structural effect but decreased as for intensity effect.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper aims to investigate sectorial (service, industry and agriculture)energy consumption in Kyrgyzstan economy for the 20025-2011 periods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The results indicate that the primary energy consumption has been increased as a result of production and structural effect but decreased as for intensity effect.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However results for intensity effect shows that till 2009, it decreased primary energy consumption, but after 2009, there has been moderate decrease in energy intensity in Kyrgyzstan economy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate sectorial (service, industry and agriculture)energy consumption in Kyrgyzstan economy for the 20025-2011 periods. The results indicate that the primary energy consumption has been increased as a result of production and structural effect but decreased as for intensity effect. Also production effect has the strongest influence on primary energy consumption in accordance with other two effects. It has been clearly seen that sectoral energy consumption increase with production closely. Rise in primary energy consumption during 2002-2011 periods was mostly due to rise in production. Similarly, structure effect has been come to conclusion as positive correlation with primary energy consumption because of increase in relative share of energy intensive sectors (especially industry) in national income. However results for intensity effect shows that till 2009, it decreased primary energy consumption, but after 2009, there has been moderate decrease in energy intensity in Kyrgyzstan economy.

Özet

Bu çalışma 2002-2011 yılları arasında Kırgızistan ekonomisi için sektörel enerji tüketimini ayrıştırma yöntemiyle analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre sektörel enerji tüketiminin çıktı ve yapısal etki nedeniyle arttığı, yoğunluk etkisi nedeniyle düştüğü görülür. Ayrıca diğer iki etkiye göre çıktı etkisi sektörel enerji tüketimi üzerinde en güçlü etkiye sahiptir. Sektörel enerji tüketimi, üretim artışı ile daha çok ilşkili olduğu için, Kırgızistan ekonomisinde 2000 yılından sonra görülen hızlı ekonomik büyüme, çıktı etkisini enerji tüketimindeki artışın en önemli faktörü haline getirmiştir. Yapısal etki, milli gelir içinde tarım sektörünün payının azalmasına ve sanayi sektörünün payının artmasına bağlı olarak enerji tüketimindeki değişime arttırıcı yönde etki yapmıştır. Yoğunluk etkisi ise diğer iki etkinin tersine, ekonomide teknolojik gelişim bakımından son yıllarda görülen iyilştirmeler ve dışa açılma gibi nedenlerle enerji tüketimini düşürücü yönde etki yapmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, A., BOSTAN, A., RAVANOĞLU, G. A. (2022). Decomposition Methods for the Analysis of Energy Consumption in Kyrgyzstan (2002-2011). Ege Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1, 39–51. https://ajindex.com/articles/495293

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ang, B.W. ve Liu, F.L. (2004) A “Generalized Fischer Index Approach to Energy Decomposition Analysis” Energy Economics, 26:757-763.
  2. Ang, B.W. (2004) “Decomposition Analysis for Policy Making in Energy: Which Is Preferred Method?” Energy Policy, 32(9):1131-1139.
  3. Asian Development Bank (2004) “Fact Sheet 2012” http://www.adb.org/publications/kyrgyz-republic-factsheet, (20.04. 2013).
  4. Cornillie, J. ve Frankhauser, S. (2004) “The Energy Intensity of Transition Countries” Energy Economics, 26:283-295.
  5. DEIK (2012) “Kırgızistan Ülke Bülteni” Dış Ekonomik İlişkiler Kurulu, Ankara.
  6. Ediger, V. ve Huvaz, Ö. (2006) “Examining the Sectoral Energy Use in Turkish Economy (1980-2000) With the Help of Decomposition Analysis” Energy Conversation and Management, 47:732-745.
  7. Egeli, H.A. ve Emsen, Ö.S. (2002) “Geçiş Sürecinde Kırgızistan Ekonomisi” Sosyal Bilimciler Dergisi, 103-116.
  8. Granel, F. (2003) “A Comperative Analysis of Index Decomposition Methods” Master Thesis, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Deparment of Industrial and System Engineering. Greening, L., William, B., Schipper, L. ve Khrushch, M. (1997) “Comparison of Six Decomposition Methods: Application to Aggregate Energy Intensity for Manufacturing in 10 OECD Countries” Energy Economic,19:375-390.
  9. Hoekstra, R. ve Van Der Bergh, J. (2003) “Comparing Structural and Index Decomposition Analysis” Energy Economics, 25:39-64.
  10. Jungitz, A. (20.06.2013) “Decomposition Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Energy and Material Inputs in Germany” http://www.petre.org.uk/papers.htm
  11. Kyrgyzstan Country Report, Transformation Index BTI 2012(2013) http://www.bti-project.org/country-reports/pse/kgz. (20.04.2013)
  12. Ma, C. ve Stern, D. (2007) “China’sChanging Energy Intensity Trend, A Decomposition Analysis” Energy Economics, 30:1037-1053.
  13. Mazat, N. ve Serrano, F. (2009) “An Analysis of Soviet Economic Growth From the 1950’s to the Collapse of USSR” Centro Sraffa Working Paper Series. Ramazanoğlu, G. ve Acar, İ. (2003 ) “Bir Geçiş Ekonomisi Örneği Olarak Kırgızistan: Siyasi Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Yanaşımlar” Review of Social, Economic and Business Studies, 7/8:385-402.
  14. Steenhof, P. (2006) “Decomposition of Electricity Demand in China’s Industrial Sector” Energy Economics, 28:370-384.
  15. Vehmas, J. (2010) “AB ve Türkiye’de CO2 Etkinliği Gelişimi” Finlandiya Geleceği Araştırma Merkezi Turku Ekonomi ve İş İdaresi Okulu. Zhang, Z.X. (2003) “Why Did the Energy Intensity Fall in China’s Industrial Sector in 1990’s; The Relative Imp