Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış / 2017 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3

Trade-Based Manipulation: The Case of Turkey

İşlem Bazlı Manipülasyon: Türkiye Örneği

Pages
369–379
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the study, according to the multiple logistic regression, all variables were found to be statistically significant; moreover, it was also found that daily return and volatility variables have more effect on manipulation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study one of the manipulation types in the capital market, namely the trade-based manipulation was investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data set for the study was gathered from 273 manipulation cases which were examined with reference to the companies detected by SPK (Capital Markets Board) to have manipulated the markets and quoted in Borsa Istanbul (BIST) in the period between 2001-2014.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the study, according to the multiple logistic regression, all variables were found to be statistically significant; moreover, it was also found that daily return and volatility variables have more effect on manipulation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001-2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study one of the manipulation types in the capital market, namely the trade-based manipulation was investigated. Data set for the study was gathered from 273 manipulation cases which were examined with reference to the companies detected by SPK (Capital Markets Board) to have manipulated the markets and quoted in Borsa Istanbul (BIST) in the period between 2001-2014. For the effect of manipulations by the companies, variables of daily return, trading volume, volatility and stock turnover rate were used. The process was classified as pre-manipulation period, manipulation period and post manipulation period. As a result of the study, according to the multiple logistic regression, all variables were found to be statistically significant; moreover, it was also found that daily return and volatility variables have more effect on manipulation.

Özet

Bu çalışmada sermaye piyasası üzerinde gerçekleştirilen manipülasyon türlerinden olan işlem bazlı manipülasyon incelenmiştir. Çalışmanın veri seti 2001-2014 dönemi arasında Borsa Istanbul'da (BIST) kota olan ve SPK tarafından manipülasyon gerçekleştirdiği tespit edilen şirketlerden hareketle 273 manipülasyon vakası ele alınmıştır. Şirketler tarafından gerçekleştirilen manipülasyonun etkisine yönelik günlük bazda; getiri, işlem hacmi, volatilite ve pay senedi devir hızı değişkenleri kullanılmıştır. Sınıflandırma işlemi; manipülasyon öncesi, manipülasyon dönemi ve manipülasyon sonrası dönem dikkate alınarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çoklu lojistik regresyon analizi sonucunda değişkenlerin tamamının istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı olduğu tespit edilmiş ayrıca günlük getiri ve volatilite değişkenlerinin manipülasyon üzerinde daha çok etkiye sahip olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

CIHANGIR, M., GEMICI, E., YAKUT, E. (2022). Trade-Based Manipulation: The Case of Turkey. Ege Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3, 369–379. https://ajindex.com/articles/495244

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Aggarwal, R.K. ve Wu, G. (2006) "Stock Market Manipulations." The Journal of Business, 79(4): 1915- 1953.
  2. Akyol, A., ve Michayluk, D. (2007) "Is there closing price manipulation on the Istanbul Stock Exchange" Australian School of Business. Working Paper. Allen, F. ve Gale, D. (1992) "Stock-Price Manipulation" The Review of Financial Studies, 5(3): 503-529.
  3. Allen, F., ve Gorton, G. (1992) "Stock price manipulation, market microstructure and asymmetric information" European Economic Review, 36(2-3): 624-630.
  4. Alpar, R. (2013) Çok Değişkenli İstatistiksel Yöntemler. 4. Baskı,
  5. Ankara,
  6. Detay Yayıncılık. Başar, A. ve Oktay, E. (2007) Uygulamalı İstatistik-I: Kısa Teorik Bilgiler ve Çözülmüş Problemler. Aktif Yayınları, 4. Baskı,
  7. Ankara.
  8. Chaturvedula, C., Bang, N. P., Rastogi, N., ve Kumar, S. (2015) "Price manipulation, front running and bulk trades: Evidence from India" Emerging Markets Review, 23: 26-45.
  9. Comerton-Forde, C. ve Putnins, T. J. (2011) "Measuring closing price manipulation" Journal of Financial Intermediation, 20: 135-158.
  10. Comerton-Forde, C. ve Putnins, T. J. (2014) "Stock Price Manipulation: Prevalence and Determinants" Review of Finance, 18(1): 23-66.
  11. Constable, P. (2011) "Ferocious Beast or Toothless Tiger? The Regulation of Stock Market Manipulation in Australia"Macquarie Journal of Business Law, (8): 54-78. de Brouwer, G. (2001) Hedge Funds in Emerging Markets. Cambridge University Press.
  12. Diaz, D., Theodoulidis, B., ve Sampaio, P. (2011) "Analysis of stock market manipulations using knowledge discovery techniques applied to intraday trade prices." Expert Systems with Applications, 38(10): 12757-12771.
  13. Felixson, K. ve Pelli, A. (1999) "Day end returns - Stock price manipulation." Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 9(2): 95-127.
  14. Feng, Z., Rongqiu, C., ve Xinping, X. (2003) "Fractal character of stock price-volume relation and regulation of stock price manipulation" Fractals, 11(2): 173-181.
  15. Fischel, D. R. ve Ross, D. J. (1991) "Should the Law Prohibit "Manipulation" in Financial Markets?" Harvard Law Review, 105(2): 503-553.
  16. Gerard, B. ve Nanda, V. (1993) "Trading and Manipulation Around Seasoned Equity Offerings." Journal of Finance, 48(1): 213-245.
  17. Hosmer, D. W. ve Lemeshow, S. (2000) Applied Logistic Regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Huang, Y. C., Chen, R. C., ve Cheng, Y. J. (2005) "Stock manipulation and its impact on market quality" working paper, National Kaohsiung First University of Science and Technology, Kaohsi