Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış / 2018 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of Turkish Banking Industry based on Multi-Dimensional Corporate Sustainability Model: Comparison between State Owned and Private Banking

Çok Boyutlu Kurumsal Sürdürülebilirlik Yaklaşımı ile Türk Bankacılık Sektörünün Değerlemesi: Kamu - Özel Banka Farklılaşması

Pages
47–62
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Recommendations have been proposed in order to enhance the robustness of the banking in the financial system by comparing corporate sustainability practices of state owned and private banks.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the main indicators of economic, social and environmental and taking into consideration of the governance and financial factors; a fivedimensional, unique and effective corporate sustainability model has been proposed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With this model, corporate sustainability evaluation of Turkish Banking Industry with a comparison between state owned and private banks in Turkey has been evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Recommendations have been proposed in order to enhance the robustness of the banking in the financial system by comparing corporate sustainability practices of state owned and private banks.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the main indicators of economic, social and environmental and taking into consideration of the governance and financial factors; a fivedimensional, unique and effective corporate sustainability model has been proposed. With this model, corporate sustainability evaluation of Turkish Banking Industry with a comparison between state owned and private banks in Turkey has been evaluated. On the basis of that multidimensional corporate sustainability model, all corporate sustainability reports published in the Turkish Banking Industry between 2009 and 2015 have been examined, and a total of 139 criteria are applied to all reports by utilizing content analysis. Recommendations have been proposed in order to enhance the robustness of the banking in the financial system by comparing corporate sustainability practices of state owned and private banks.

Özet

Kurumlarin farklı açılardan değerlemesi bütünselperformanslarının tam olarak ortaya konulabilmesiaçısından önem taşımaktadır. Çalışmada,sürdürülebilirliğin ekonomik, sosyal ve çevresel üçboyutuna ek olarak, yönetsel ve finans boyutlarıile birlikte beş boyutlu özgün ve etkin bir kurumsalsürdürülebilirlik yaklaşımı ile bir değerlemeyaklaşımı öne sürülmektedir. Bu yaklaşım ileTürk bankacılık sektörünün sürdürülebilirlikdeğerlemesi kamu ve özel banka farklılaşmasıkapsamında ortaya konulmustur. Çok boyutlusürdürülebilirlik yaklaşımı ile 2009-2015 yıllarıarasında Türk Bankacılık Sektöründe yayınlanantüm sürdürülebilirlik raporları incelenmiş,belirlenen 139 kriter ile içerik analizi uygulanarakdeğerleme yapılmıştır. Sürdürülebilir bir bankacılıksisteminin sağlanması ve finansal sistemin dahasağlıklı işlemesini desteklemek amacıyla kamu veözel sektör bankaları için öneriler sunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

FURTUNA, Ö. K., TEZCAN, N., ARAS, G. (2022). Evaluation of Turkish Banking Industry based on Multi-Dimensional Corporate Sustainability Model: Comparison between State Owned and Private Banking. Ege Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 47–62. https://ajindex.com/articles/495178

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aras, G. 2015. Sustainable Markets for Sustainable Business: Global Perspective for Business and Financial Markets, Routledge Publishing, UK Aras, G. ve Crowther, D. (2009), “Making Sustainable Development Sustainable”, Management Decision, 47( 6): 975-988. Aras G. ve Crowther D. (2009a), “Corporate Sustainability Reporting: A Study in Disingenuity?”, Journal of Business Ethics, 87: 279-288.
  2. Bilgin, N. (2001), Sosyal Bilimlerde İçerik Analizi: Teknikler ve Örnek Çalışmalar, Siyasal Kitabevi, İstanbul. Birleşmiş Milletler Küresel İlkeler Sözleşmesi, http:// www.globalcompactturkiye.org/ (16.06.2016).
  3. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks: Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Chichester UK: Capstone Publishing Limited. GRI (2013),
  4. Sustainability Reporting Guidelines, Global Reporting Initiatives Guidebook. Hackston, D. ve Milne, M.J. (1996), “Some Determinants of Social and Environmental Disclosures in New Zealand Companies”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9(1), 77-108.
  5. Hussain, N, Ugo R ve Rene´ P. Orij. (2016) “Corporate Governance and Sustainability Performance: Analysis of Triple Bottom Line Performance”, Journal of Business Ethics. 25: 1-22.
  6. Jeucken, M. H., ve Bouma, J. J. (1999). “The Changing Environment of Banks”, Greener Management International, 27: 20-35.
  7. Jeucken, M. (2001). “Sustainable Finance and Banking – Slow Starters are Gaining Pace”, Working Paper Series, Sustainability in Finance:1–7.
  8. Kaderli, Y. Gündüz, Ç. (2014), “Sürdürülebilirlik ve Firma Performansı: BİST 100 Banka Endeksi Üzerine Bir Uyugulama” 18. Finans Sempozyumu Pamukkale Üniversitesi Bildiriler Kitabı.:607-625.
  9. Kaya, E.Ö. (2010), “Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Sürecinde Bankaların Rolü ve Türkiye’de Sürdürülebilir Bankacılık Uygulamaları”, İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(3): 75-94.
  10. Khan, Md.H., Islam M.A., Fatima J.K. ve Ahmed K. (2011), “Corporate Sustainability Reporting of Major Commercial Banks in line with GRI: Bangladesh Evidence”, Social Responsibility Journal, 7(3): 347-352.
  11. Krippendorff, K. (2004), Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology, Sage Publications, London. Milne, M.J. ve Adler, R.W. (1999), “Exploring the Reliability of Social and Environmental Disclosures Content Analysis”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 12(2): 237-256.
  12. Moneva, J., Juana M. Rivera-lirio, M. J.Munoz-torres. (2007), “The Corporate Stakeholder Commitment and Social and Financial Performance”. Industrial Management & Data System, 107(1): 84-102