Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış / 2012 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

Tüketicilerde suçluluk duygusu: öncül ve sonuçları üzerine bir model

Consumer guilt: a model of its antecedents and consequences

Pages
9–22
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings reveal that regret due to action, regret due to inaction, transgression of norms, self-control failures and indulgence in hedonic desires are the antecedents that significantly explain consumer guilt.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Consumer guilt is a feeling which results from one’s recognition of having failed to achieve or violated internalized personal or social moral standards in the context of consumption.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The findings reveal that regret due to action, regret due to inaction, transgression of norms, self-control failures and indulgence in hedonic desires are the antecedents that significantly explain consumer guilt.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Comparison of respondents with high and low guilt scores revealed significant differences.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Consumer guilt is a feeling which results from one’s recognition of having failed to achieve or violated internalized personal or social moral standards in the context of consumption. The present study aims to contribute to current knowledge of consumer guilt by offering a comprehensive structural model of consumer guilt, its antecedents and consequences. The findings reveal that regret due to action, regret due to inaction, transgression of norms, self-control failures and indulgence in hedonic desires are the antecedents that significantly explain consumer guilt. Among coping responses studied in literature, only the ones that relate to reparative action, psychological repair work and justification significantly loaded to coping responses factor. Comparison of respondents with high and low guilt scores revealed significant differences.

Özet

Tüketicilerde suçluluk duygusu bireyin, tüketim bağlamında, içselleşmiş kişisel ya da sosyal ahlaki standartları ihlal ettiğini ya da bu standartlara erişemediğini fark etmesi sonucunda oluşmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, tüketicilerdeki suçluluk duygusu, öncül değişkenleri ve sonuçları üzerine geniş kapsamlı yapısal bir model ile ilgili literature katkıda bulunmaktır. Bulgular eylem veya eylemsizlik nedeniyle pişmanlık, normların aşılması, kendini kontrol hataları ve hedonik arzulara olan düşkünlüğün tüketicilerde suçluluk duygularını anlamlı bir şekilde açıkladığını ortaya koymaktadır. Literatürde incelenen başa çıkma tepkileri arasında sadece düzeltici eylem, psikolojik olarak kendini rahatlatma ve mazeret bulma gözlemlenmiştir. Yüksek ve düşük suçluluk skorlarına sahip katılımcılar anlamlı olarak farklılık göstermektedirler.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEDEOĞLU, Ö. A., KAZANÇOĞLU, İ. (2022). Tüketicilerde suçluluk duygusu: öncül ve sonuçları üzerine bir model. Ege Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 9–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/495175

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Bagozzi, R. P., Baumgartner, H., Pieters, R., Zeelenberg, M. (2000) “The Role Of Emotions in Goal-Directed Behavior” S. Ratneshwar, D. G Mick, C. Huffman (eds.) The Why of Consumption: Contemporary Perspectives on Consumers Motives, Goals and Desires, London, Routledge. Baumeister, R.F. (2002) “Yielding to Temptation: Self-Control Failure, Impulsive Purchasing And Consumer Behavior” Journal of Consumer Research, 28(4):670- 676. Baumeister, R.F., Stillwell, A.M., Heatherton, T.F. (1995) “Personal Narratives About Guilt: Role in Action Control And İnterpersonal Relationships” Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17(1/2): 173-198.
  2. Bei, L. T., Lin, Y. T, Yu, C. M. (2007) “The Relationship Between Consumer Guilt And Shopping Behavior” in G. Fitzsimons, V. Morwitz (eds). Advances in Consumer Research, 34, Duluth, MN: Association for Consumer Research, 405-408.
  3. Belk, R. W., Ger, G., Askegaard, S. (2003) “The Fire of Desire: A Multisided Inquiry into Consumer Passion” Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3):326-351. Ben-Ze’ev, A. (2000)
  4. The Subtlety of Emotions, USA, MIT Press.
  5. Bonsu, S, Main, K. (2006) “Consumer Guilt: Preliminary Construct Assessment And Scale Development” M. C. Lees, T. Davis, G. Gregory (eds.) Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research, Sydney, Australia, Association for Consumer Research. Boujbel, L. (2008) “Never-Ending Desires: Assessing Consumers’ Propensity to Desire Consumption Objects” S. Borghini, M.A. McGrath, C. Otnes (eds.) European Advances in Consumer Research, Duluth, MN, Association for Consumer Research. Burnett, M. S, Lunsford, D. A. (1994) “Conceptualizing Guilt in The Consumer Decision-Making Process” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 11(3):33-43.
  6. Cervone, D., Shadel, W. G., Smith, R. E, Fiori, M. (2006) “Self-Regulation: Reminders And Suggestions From Personality Science” Applied Psychology: An International Review, 55(3): 333–385.
  7. Chun, H., Patrick, V. M, MacInnis, D. J. (2007) “Making Prudent Vs. Impulsive Choices: The Role of Anticipated Shame And Guilt on Consumer Self- Control” G. Fitzsimons, V. Morwitz (eds.) Advances in Consumer Research, Duluth, MN, Association for Consumer Research. Connolly, T, Zeelenberg, M. (2002) “Regret in Decision Making” Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(6):212-216.
  8. Cooke, A. D. J., Meyvis, T., Schwartz, A. (2001) “Avoiding Future Regret in Purchase-Timing Decisions” Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4): 447-459.
  9. Cotte, J, Ritchie, R. (2005) “Advertisers’ Theories of Consumers: Why Us