Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış / 2018 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

A Research On The Differences Between Business Negotiation Styles Of Turkish And American Managers

Türk ve Amerikan Yöneticilerin İş Müzakere Tarzlarındaki Farklılıklar Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Pages
273–288
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Coherently, somequalitative assessments were also found supportingthe convergence trajectory towards cultureindependent‘common’ principles in internationalbusiness and cooperation negotiations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It is a well-proven evidence that national culturesof international business managers affect theirnegotiation styles.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Combining these two premises, thisresearch compares the key negotiation tendenciesof 108 Turkish and American managers who havebeen somewhat involved in business negotiationson behalf of their organizations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Coherently, somequalitative assessments were also found supportingthe convergence trajectory towards cultureindependent‘common’ principles in internationalbusiness and cooperation negotiations.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

It is a well-proven evidence that national culturesof international business managers affect theirnegotiation styles. There are also cross-nationalstudies suggesting that Turkish and Americancultures have unique characteristics and differ inmany ways. Combining these two premises, thisresearch compares the key negotiation tendenciesof 108 Turkish and American managers who havebeen somewhat involved in business negotiationson behalf of their organizations. Data was obtainedthrough quantitative ranking style questionnairesand interviews administrated in the CaliforniaState of America and major cities in Turkey. In thequalitative part, utilizing the mutual assessmentsof experienced Turkish negotiators on Americannegotiation styles and vice versa, the study givesinsights into the debate on the determinants ofcross-cultural business negotiations in the caseof these two distinct cultures. Results from theindependent-samples t-test which compared themeans of quantitative scores reveal that althoughthe negotiation styles of Turkish and Americanmanagers working for fully-domestic businessesdiffer significantly, both American and Turkishmanagers of multinational businesses tend touse similar negotiation styles. Coherently, somequalitative assessments were also found supportingthe convergence trajectory towards cultureindependent‘common’ principles in internationalbusiness and cooperation negotiations.

Özet

Uluslararası işletme yöneticilerinin ulusal kültürlerinin onların iş müzakere tarzlarını etkilemesi ampirik olarak iyi desteklenen bir bulgudur. Ayrıca, kendine özgü özellikleri olan Türk ve Amerikan kültürlerinin birçok yönden farklı olduğunu ortaya koyan kültürler arası çalışmalar da bulunmaktadır. Bu araştırma, söz konusu iki önermeyi birleştirerek, kendi iş örgütlerini temsilen bir şekilde iş müzakerelerinde yer almış 108 Türk ve Amerikan yöneticinin temel müzakere eğilimlerini karşılaştırmaktadır. Veriler, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri’nin Kaliforniya eyaletinde ve Türkiye’nin büyük şehirlerinde yürütülen ve nicel sıralamaya dayalı anketler ve görüşmeler aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Çalışmanın nitel analiz kısmında, deneyimli Türk ve Amerikan müzakerecilerin birbirlerinin müzakere tarzlarına ilişkin karşılıklı değerlendirmeleri üzerinden, uluslararası iş müzakerelerinin belirleyicilerine ilişkin görüşler, genel olarak bu iki farklı kültür örneğinde tartışılmaktadır. Nicel skor ortalamalarını karşılaştıran bağımsız-örnekler t-testi sonuçları, tamamen yerli işletmelerde çalışan Türk ve Amerikan yöneticilerin müzakere tarzlarının anlamlı bir biçimde farklılaşma eğilimi göstermesine rağmen, çok uluslu işletmelerde çalışan Türk ve Amerikan yöneticilerin benzer müzakere tarzlarını kullandıklarını ortaya koymaktadır. Nicel analiz sonuçları ile uyumlu bir biçimde bazı nitel değerlendirmeler de uluslararası iş ve iş birliği müzakerelerinde kültürlerden bağımsız ‘ortak’ ilkelere doğru bir yakınsama yönelimini desteklemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRAL, Ö. (2022). A Research On The Differences Between Business Negotiation Styles Of Turkish And American Managers. Ege Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 273–288. https://ajindex.com/articles/495163

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Abbasi, M. S., Tarhini, A., Elyas, T. and Shah, F. (2015) “Impact of Individualism and Collectivism Over the Individual’s Technology Acceptance Behaviour: A MultiGroup Analysis Between Pakistan And Turkey” Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(6): 747-768.
  2. Adair, W. L., Taylor, M., Chu, J., Ethier, N., Xiong, T., Okumura, T. and Brett, J. (2013) “Effective Influence in Negotiation: The Role of Culture and Framing” International Studies of Management & Organization, 43(4): 6-25.
  3. Adler, N. J. and Graham, J. L. (1989) “Cross-Cultural Interaction: The International Comparison Fallacy?” Journal of International Business Studies, 20(3): 515-537.
  4. Akgunes, A. and Culpepper, R. (2012) “Negotiations Between Chinese and Americans: Examining the Cultural Context and Salient Factors” The Journal of International Management Studies, 7(1): 191-200.
  5. Altintas, F. Ç. (2008) “A Comparative Analysis of Turkish and German Managers’ Personal Values” Ankara University SBF Journal, 63(4): 65-87.
  6. Arpaci, I., Cetin, Y. Y., Turetken, O. (2015) “A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Smartphone Adoption by Canadian and Turkish Organizations” Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 18(3): 214-238.
  7. Babayiğit, S. (2006) Business Negotiations at Different Cultures in International Marketing and An Application, (written in Turkish), Unpublished PhD Thesis, Erciyes University, Institute of Social Sciences, Kayseri, Turkey. Bachkirov, A. A. and AlAbri, S. (2016) “Islamic Values and Negotiator Behaviour” International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 9(3): 333-345.
  8. Bergiel, E. B., Bergiel, B. J. and Upson, J. W. (2012) “Revisiting Hofstede’s Dimensions: Examining the Cultural Convergence of the United States and Japan” American Journal of Management, 12(1): 69-79.
  9. Carnevale, P. J. (1995) “Property, Culture, and Negotiation” R. M. Kramer and D. M. Messick (Eds.) Negotiation as A Social Process, Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp.309-323.
  10. Cortina, L. M. and Wasti, S. A. (2005) “Profiles in Coping: Responses to Sexual Harassment Across Persons, Organizations, and Cultures” Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1): 182-192.
  11. Cox, T. H. and Blake, S. (1991) “Managing Cultural Diversity: Implications for Organizational Competitiveness” Academy of Management Executive, 5(3): 45-56.
  12. Cukur, C. S., De Guzman, M. R. T. and Carlo, Gustavo (2004) “Religiosity, Values, and Horizontal and Vertical Individualism-Collectivism: A Study of Turkey, the United States, and the Philippin