Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış / 2019 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 4

Analyzing Financial Insufficiency of Households in Turkey with Multivariate Probit Model

Türkiye’de Hanehalklarının Finansal Yetersizliğinin Multivariate Probit Model ile Analizi

Pages
401–410
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings show thathousehold size, being a tenant, changing the job,being unemployment but looking for a job and beingchronic illness for household head have positive,income, being a female and being a graduate fromuniversity or a higher degree for household headhave negative effects on each financial insufficiency indicators.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Permanent or particular financial insufficienciesof households cause crucial interruptions oncompulsory payments of households.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study,the determining factors of financial insufficiency of11918 households that surveyed in TurkStat’s Surveyof Income and Living Conditions (SILC) 2012 areanalyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings show thathousehold size, being a tenant, changing the job,being unemployment but looking for a job and beingchronic illness for household head have positive,income, being a female and being a graduate fromuniversity or a higher degree for household headhave negative effects on each financial insufficiency indicators.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Permanent or particular financial insufficienciesof households cause crucial interruptions oncompulsory payments of households. In this study,the determining factors of financial insufficiency of11918 households that surveyed in TurkStat’s Surveyof Income and Living Conditions (SILC) 2012 areanalyzed. The financial insufficiency of householdscan be denoted by several indicators. The responsesof household head for three questions on financialconditions of household in survey are treated asindicators for financial insufficiency. MultivariateProbit Model is used to determine the effects of theproperties of household head and households asindependent variables on three dependent variablesabout financial conditions and to estimate thesemodels simultaneously. The findings show thathousehold size, being a tenant, changing the job,being unemployment but looking for a job and beingchronic illness for household head have positive,income, being a female and being a graduate fromuniversity or a higher degree for household headhave negative effects on each financial insufficiency indicators.

Özet

Hanelerin zaman içerisinde sürekli ya da kısmı zamanlı olarak ekonomik anlamda sıkıntıya girmeleri yani finansal durumlarının yetersiz olması hanelerin zorunlu ödemelerinde aksaklıklar meydana getirebilmektedir. Bu çalışmada TÜİK 2012 yılı Gelir ve Yaşam Koşulları Araştırması (GYKA)’nda yer alan 11918 hanenin finansal yetersizliğinin belirleyicileri analiz edilmiştir. Hanelerin finansal yetersizliği çeşitli göstergelerle ifade edilebilmektedir. Çalışmada hanehalkı reisinin, ankette yer alan hanelerin ekonomik durumlarına ilişkin üç soruya verdiği yanıtlar finansal yetersizliğinin birer göstergesi olarak ele alınmaktadır. Hanelerin ekonomik durumları üzerine bilgi sağlayan üç bağımlı değişken için hanehalkı reisi ve hanenin özelliklerinin etkilerinin belirlenebilmesi ve bu modellerin aynı anda tahmin edilmesi amacıyla çalışmada Multivariate Probit Model kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular incelendiğinde, her bir finansal yetersizlik göstergesi üzerinde hanehalkı büyüklüğünün, hanehalkının kiracı olmasının, hanehakı reisinin iş değişikliği yapmasının, iş arıyor olmasının ve kronik hasta olmasının pozitif, hanenin gelirinin, hanehalkı reisinin kadın olmasının ve hanehalkı reisinin üniversite ve üstü eğitim düzeyinde olmasının ise negatif etkisi bulunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SİGEZE, Ç., UĞUR, M. S. (2022). Analyzing Financial Insufficiency of Households in Turkey with Multivariate Probit Model. Ege Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 4, 401–410. https://ajindex.com/articles/495147

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Acar, A. ve Baslevent, C. (2013) “Examination of the Transition of Turkish Households into and out of Poverty between 2007-2010” (No. 5779), EcoMod. Alkire, S. ve Foster, J. (2009) “Counting and Multidimensional Poverty Measurement” OPHI Working Paper. No. 32. December. Oxford Department of International Development, Queen Elizabeth House (QEH), University of Oxford. Andriopoulou, E. ve Tsakloglou, P. (2011) “The Determinants of Poverty Transitions in Europe and the Role of Duration Dependence” IZA Discussion Paper No. 5692. Bhalla, A. ve Lapeyre, F. (1997) “Social Exclusion: Towards an Analytical and Operational Framework” Development and Change, 28: 413-433.
  2. Bourguignon, F. ve Chakravarty, S.R (2003) “The Measurement of Multidimensional Poverty” The Journal of Economic Inequality, 1 (1): 25-49.
  3. Brock, K. (1999) “It’s Not Only Wealth That Matters - It’s Peace of Mind Too: A Review of Participatory Work on Poverty and Illbeing” Washington: World Bank. Cappellari, L. ve Jenkins, S. P. (2003) “Multivariate Probit Regression using Simulated Maximum Likelihood” The Stata Journal, 3(3), 278-294.
  4. Castillo-Manzano, J. I. (2010) “Determinants of Commercial Revenues at Airports: Lessons Learned from Spanish Regional Airports” Tourism Management, 31(6), 788-796.
  5. Chambers, R. ve Conway, G. (1992) “Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Practical Concepts for the 21st Century” IDS Discussion Paper. No. 296. Brighton: IDS. Çevik, N. K. ve Korkmaz, O. (2014) “Türkiye’de Yaşam Doyumu ve İş Doyumu Arasındaki İlişkinin İki Değişkenli Sıralı Probit Model Analizi” Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1), 126. Dal, S. ve Sevüktekin, M. (2018) “Türkiye’de Öznel İyi Oluş’un Yaşam Alanları Yaklaşımı İle Ölçülmesi” Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 2018: 433-446.
  6. Dalgıç, B., İyidoğan, P. V. ve Güven, A. (2015) “Yoksulluk ve Yoksulluk Geçişlerinin Belirleyenleri: Türkiye Örneği”, Sosyoekonomi, 23(24):51-70.
  7. Devicienti, F. (2002) “Poverty Persistence in Britain: A Multivariate Analysis using the BHPS, 1991–1997” Journal of Economics, 9:307-340.
  8. Diener, E., Suh, E. ve Oishi, S. (1997) “Recent Findings on Subjective Well-being” Indian Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24: 25-41.
  9. Easterlin, R.A. (1974) “Does Economic Growth Improve the Human lot? Some Empirical Evidence” In David, P.A., and Reder, M.W. (eds.). Nations and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honor of Moses Abramowitz (pp. 89- 125). Academic Press,
  10. NY. Easterlin, R. A