SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış / 2020 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2

Non-standard Sources for Arms Production and Arms Trade Data

Filiz AKBAŞ-YEŞİLYURT
M. Ensar YEŞİLYURT
Pages
91–99
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Like other industrial/sector data sets, the main problem for arms data sets is revisions of industrial classifications, which prevent thecreation of long time series.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Even though there are a range of useful sources on defence economics data, only some of them are used widely.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Themain sources of export, import and output data sets are Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), WorldMilitary Expenditures and Arms Transfers-US Department of State (WMEAT), European Statistical Office (EUROSTAT) andUnited Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) while SIPRI and WMEAT are for military expenditures.This paper discusses the main features and similarities of data sets from the various sources.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Like other industrial/sector data sets, the main problem for arms data sets is revisions of industrial classifications, which prevent thecreation of long time series.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Even though there are a range of useful sources on defence economics data, only some of them are used widely. Themain sources of export, import and output data sets are Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), WorldMilitary Expenditures and Arms Transfers-US Department of State (WMEAT), European Statistical Office (EUROSTAT) andUnited Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) while SIPRI and WMEAT are for military expenditures.This paper discusses the main features and similarities of data sets from the various sources. Like other industrial/sector data sets, the main problem for arms data sets is revisions of industrial classifications, which prevent thecreation of long time series.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKBAŞ-YEŞİLYURT, F., YEŞİLYURT, M. E. (2022). Non-standard Sources for Arms Production and Arms Trade Data. Ege Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2, 91–99. https://ajindex.com/articles/495121

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Da Silva, D. L. (2018), Filling Arms Production Data Gaps: South America as a Case in Point, The Economics of Peace and Security Journal 13 (2): 19-25
  2. Fleurant, A and Tian, N. (2018), SIPRI’s Arms Producing and Military Services Companies Database, The Economics of Peace and Security Journal, 13 (2): 5-10
  3. Hartley, K. (2018), Arms industry Data: Knowns and Unknowns, Economics of Peace and Security Journal 13 (2): 30-35 http://data.un.org/Data.aspx?d=WDI&f=Indicator_Code%3AMS.MIL.XPND.GD.ZS https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/prodcom/data/ excel-files-nace-rev.2 https://stat.unido.org/ https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-worldfactbook/rankorder/2034rank.html https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/ pdf_2017_06/20170629_170629-pr2017-111-en.pdf https://www.state.gov/t/avc/rls/rpt/wmeat/
  4. Kinsella, D. (2000), Arms production in the third tier: An Analysis of Opportunity and Willingness, International Interactions, 26: 3, 253-286
  5. Perlo-Freeman, S. (2018),
  6. Arms, Corruption, and the State: Understanding the Role of Arms Trade Corruption in Power Politics, Economics of Peace and Security Journal 13 (2): 36-46
  7. SIPRI.org Smith, R. and Dunne, J. P. (2018), Issues in the Quantitative Analysis of the SIPRI Arms Industry Database, Economics of Peace and Security Journal 13 (2): 11-18
  8. Wulf, H. (2018), Analysis of SIPRI’s Arms Production Data: Some Suggestions for Expansion, The Economics of Peace and Security Journal 13 (2): 26-29
  9. Yesilyurt F., Guloglu B., Yesilyurt M. E. and Sezgin Ş. (2014),
  10. The Determinants of Arms Production, Defence and Peace Economics, 25 (2): 205-211