Journals / Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Investigation of Recent Developments in Tool Condition Monitoring during Machining Operations

Talaş Kaldırma İşlemlerinde Takım Durumunun İzlemesi İçin Son Gelişmelerin İncelenmesi

Pages
314–337
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, the most reliable decision support systems were clearly explained and suitable methods were mentioned for any different experimental design procedure.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Recent studies for tool condition monitoring were evaluated and the effective parameters on monitoring of machining operations were discussed in this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The effective variables on tool condition monitoring, signal processing methods, feature selection, monitoring limitations and all of the advantages and disadvantages were analyzed by considering the recent studies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, the most reliable decision support systems were clearly explained and suitable methods were mentioned for any different experimental design procedure.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Talaş kaldırma işlemi · Takım durumu · Bulanık mantık

Abstract

Recent studies for tool condition monitoring were evaluated and the effective parameters on monitoring of machining operations were discussed in this study. The effective variables on tool condition monitoring, signal processing methods, feature selection, monitoring limitations and all of the advantages and disadvantages were analyzed by considering the recent studies. Also in this paper the most common and most known experimental design methods were discussed for developing the generality of the tool condition monitoring models. Finally, all of the common used decision support systems in tool condition monitoring were considered and the necessary comparisons were made with others. Furthermore, the most reliable decision support systems were clearly explained and suitable methods were mentioned for any different experimental design procedure.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, takım durumunun izlemesi için son yıllarda yapılan çalışmalar incelenmiş ve talaş kaldırma işlemlerinin izlenmesinde etki sağlayan parametreler tartışılmıştır. Son yıllardaki çalışmalar göz önüne alınarak, takım durumunun izlenmesi için etkili değişkenler, sinyal işleme metotları, veri seçilmesi ve izleme sınırlıkları tartışılarak tüm avantajları ve dezavantajları incelenmiştir. Ayrıca bu makalede takım izleme modelinin genelliğinin geliştirilmesi için kullanılan ve en çok tanınan deney tasarım metotlarından bahsedilmiştir. Son olarak, takım durumunun tahmini için kullanılan tüm karar destek sistemleri bahsedilerek gerekli karşılaştırmalar yapılmıştır. Buna ek olarak, en güvenilir karar destek sistemleri açık bir şekilde anlatılmış ve farklı deney tasarımı prosedürüne uygun olan yöntemler bahsedilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SALİMİASL, A., RAFİGHİ, M. (2022). Investigation of Recent Developments in Tool Condition Monitoring during Machining Operations. Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 314–337. https://ajindex.com/articles/494616

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Cook, N.H. Journal of Engineering for Industry, 95(4) (1973) 931. Chen, J.C. and J.C. Chen The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 25(5-6) (2005) 427. Özel, T. and Y. Karpat International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 45(4) (2005) 467. Benardos, P. and G.-C. Vosniakos International journal of machine tools and manufacture, 43(8) (2003) 833. Teti, R., et al. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 59(2) (2010) 717. Liang, S.Y., R.L. Hecker, and R.G. Landers, Machining Process Monitoring and Control: The State–of–the–Art,ASME 2002 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition,2002, 599-610.
  2. Franco-Gasca, L.A., et al. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 40(7-8) (2009) 676. Guyon, I. and A. Elisseeff The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3((2003) 1157. Shi, D., D. Axinte, and N. Gindy The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 34(1-2) (2007) 34. Lee, D.-E., et al. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 46(2) (2006) 176. Chen, B., et al. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 25(7) (2011) 2526. Heinemann, R. and S. Hinduja International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 52(1) (2012) 69. Arul, S., L. Vijayaraghavan, and S. Malhotra Journal of materials processing technology, 185(1) (2007) 184. Qin, F., et al. Wear, 267(5) (2009) 991. Binsaeid, S., et al. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 209(10) (2009) 4728. Deiab, I., K. Assaleh, and F. Hammad Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 23(5) (2009) 1719. Jemielniak, K. and P. Arrazola CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 1(2) (2008) 97. Jemielniak, K., S. Bombiński, and P. Aristimuno CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 57(1) (2008) 121. Cao, H., et al. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 48(2) (2008) 141. Marinescu, I. and D.A. Axinte International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 48(10) (2008) 1148. Marinescu, I. and D. Axinte International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 49(1) (2009) 53. Brezak, D., et al. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(3) (2012) 797. Li, H., H. Zeng, and X. Chen Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 180(1) (2006) 296. Bhattacharyya, P., D. Sengupta, and S. Mukhopadhyay Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 21(6) (2007) 2665. Ghosh, N., et al. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 21(1) (2007) 466. Huang, S., et al. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 47(3