SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Karyological and Palynological Investigations of Cyanus depressus Species

Cyanus depressus (M. Bieb.) Soják Türünün Karyolojik ve Palinolojik Yönden İncelenmesi

Neslihan TAŞAR
Gülden DOĞAN
Yaşar KIRAN
Pages
299–305
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Palynological studies have shown that pollen subprolate, apertures tricolporate, and orbitality are scabrate, and necessary measurements were made.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Cyanus depressus (M.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The number of basic chromosomes collected from natural habitats in Elazığ in 2011 was 2n = 16.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Palynological studies have shown that pollen subprolate, apertures tricolporate, and orbitality are scabrate, and necessary measurements were made.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Cyanus · Karyotip · Polen Morfolojisi

Abstract

The Cyanus depressus (M. Bieb.) Soják species belonging to the genus Cyanus (Asteraceae) was examined from the karyological and palynological. The number of basic chromosomes collected from natural habitats in Elazığ in 2011 was 2n = 16. The chromosomes of the species were observed to be median (m) and submedian (sm) centromers. Palynological studies have shown that pollen subprolate, apertures tricolporate, and orbitality are scabrate, and necessary measurements were made.

Özet

Cyanus (Asteraceae) cinsine ait Cyanus depressus (M. Bieb.) Soják türü karyolojik ve palinolojik yönden incelendi. 2011 yılında Elazığ’daki doğal habitatından toplanan türün temel kromozom sayısı 2n=16 olarak tespit edildi. Türe ait kromozomların median (m) ve submedian (sm) sentromerli olduğu gözlendi. Palinolojik çalışmalar sonucunda polen şekli subprolat, apertürleri tricolporat, ornemantasyonun ise skabrate olduğu belirlenerek, gerekli ölçümler yapıldı.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞAR, N., DOĞAN, G., KIRAN, Y. (2022). Karyological and Palynological Investigations of Cyanus depressus Species. Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 299–305. https://ajindex.com/articles/494610

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. A. Güner, N. Özhatay, T. Ekim, K.H.C Başer Flora of Turkey and The East Aegean (2000).
  2. P.H. Raven, D.I. Axelrod Annals of The Missouri Botanical Garden 61 (1974) 539-673.
  3. K. Bremer, C.J. Humphries Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. Bot. 23 (2) (1993) 71-177.
  4. P.H. Davis, Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, Edinburgh Univ. Press,
  5. Second Supplement, Edinburgh, (1965) 1-9.
  6. H. Duman, Achillea L. In: Güner A, Özhatay N, Ekim T, Başer KHC Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands 11 Edinburgh University Pres (2000).
  7. N. Zonuz, Bazı Achillea L. (Asteraceae) türlerine ait tohumlarda ağ asidi kompozisyonunun belirlenmesi, Doktora Tezi, Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi,
  8. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Sivas (2016).
  9. G. Wagenitz, F.H. Hellwig, Evolution of characters and phylogeny of the Centaureinae D.J.N., Beentje H.J. (eds), Compositae: Systematics. Proceedings of the International Compositae Conference, Kew, (1994) 491-510. R.K. Brummitt Vascular plant families and genera Royal Botanic Gardens (2004).
  10. G. Wagenitz, L. Genus Centaurea In: Davis PH (ed.), Edinburgh University Press 5 (1975) 465–585.
  11. P.H. Davis., R.R. Mill, K.Tan, Centaurea L. In: Davis P.H., Mill R.R., Tan K. (eds) 10 Edinburgh University Press (1988) 166-169.
  12. A. Duran, H. Duman Ann. Bot. Fenn. 39 (2002) 43-48.
  13. I. Turkoglu, H. Akan, S. Civelek Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 143 (2003) 207212. M.E. Uzunhisarcıklı, M. Tekşen, E. Doğan Annales Botanici Fennici 42(4) (2005) 309-312. Z. Aytac¸ H. Duman Pakistan Journal Of Botany 37(3) (2005) 563-566.
  14. Z. Kaya, M. Vural Novon 17 (2007) 198-201.
  15. Y.B. Köse, A. Ocak, İ. P. Erkara Nordic Journal of Botany 28(4) (2010) 475-478.
  16. İ. P. Erkara, Y.B. Köse, K.O Soydan, E. Yücel Plant systematics and evolution 298(6) (2012) 1111-1117.
  17. G. Wagenitz, F.H. Hellwig Willdenowia 30(1) (2000) 29-44. W. Greuter Willdenowia 33 (2003) 49-61.
  18. M. Ranjbar, K. Negaresh Biological Diversity and Conservation 5(3) 2012 18-23. Anonim, https://books.google.com.tr/books?id T.R. Tonian Revue de Biologie 33 (5) (1980) 552-554. S.M. Ghaffari Botanical Journal Of Iran 4 (1989) 189-196. G.B. Khaniki Cell Chromosome Res. 18(1) (1995) 16-33.
  19. N. Garcia-Jacas, A, Susanna, R. Ilarslan, H. Ilarslan Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 125 (1997) 343-349. Ş. Elçi Fırat Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Yayınları 3(1982).
  20. A. Levan, K. Fredga, A.A. Sandberg Hereditas 52 (1964) 201-220. C. R. Zarco Taxon 35 (1986) 526-530. G.L. Stebbins Journal Of Electromagnetic Analysis an Applications (1971) 87-89. R.P. Wodehouse McGraw-H