Journals / Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Decay Resistance of Carbonized Wood Surfaces

Yüzeyleri Karbonlaştırılmış Odunların Çürüklüğe Karşı Direnci

Pages
746–753
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results single or five surface carbonized Scots pine specimen showed reduced weight loses when compared to un-carbonized controls.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, decay resistance of carbonized wood surfaces by combustion method was examined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context either single or five geometrical surfaces of Scots pine and beech wood specimens were carbonized and exposed to Coniophora puteana (brown rot) and Pleurotus ostreatus (white rot) decay fungi for 12 weeks.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results single or five surface carbonized Scots pine specimen showed reduced weight loses when compared to un-carbonized controls.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Karbonlaştırılmış odun · çürüklük mantarı · sarıçam

Abstract

In this study, decay resistance of carbonized wood surfaces by combustion method was examined. In this context either single or five geometrical surfaces of Scots pine and beech wood specimens were carbonized and exposed to Coniophora puteana (brown rot) and Pleurotus ostreatus (white rot) decay fungi for 12 weeks. According to the results single or five surface carbonized Scots pine specimen showed reduced weight loses when compared to un-carbonized controls. Beech wood specimens, on the other hand, resulted significantly low weight losses only for five surface carbonized specimens. A statically significant difference was found between the control samples of both wood species. Since surface carbonization did not introduce any differences among the treatment types of white rot fungi for both wood species, this method could be useful against brown rot fungi (C. puteana) risk.

Özet

Bu çalışmada pürmüz ile yakma metodu uygulanarak yüzeyleri karbonlaştırılan sarıçam ve kayın odun örneklerinin çürüklük mantarlarına karşı dayanımı araştırılmıştır. Bu kapsamda tek ve beş yüzeyi karbonlaştırılan örnekler ağaç malzemede esmer ve beyaz çürüklük meydana getiren Coniophora puteana ve Pleurotus ostreatus mantarlarına karşı 12 haftalık süreyle maruz bırakılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda esmer çürüklük mantarına maruz bırakılan sarıçam odun örneklerinde tek ve beş yüzeyi karbonlaştırılan örneklerde, kayın odununda ise beş yüzeyi karbonlaştırılan örneklerin ağırlık kayıplarında azalma olmuştur. Her iki ağaç türünün kontrol örnekleri ile aralarında istatistiki olarak da anlamlı fark bulunmuştur. Beyaz çürüklük mantarına maruz bırakılan örneklerin her iki ağaç türü içinde kontrol örnekleri arasında ağırlık kayıpları bakımından istatistiki olarak fark bulunmamıştır. Bu sonuçlar karbonlaştırılan odun örneklerinin esmer çürüklüğün (C. puteana) risk olduğu yerlerde kullanılabileceğini ortaya koymuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKÇAY, Ç., SAYGIN, İ. K., TAŞÇIOĞLU, C. (2022). Decay Resistance of Carbonized Wood Surfaces. Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 746–753. https://ajindex.com/articles/494121

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. FPL report, “Charcoal production, marketing, and use,” Forest Product Laboratory, USA, Rep. 2213, 1961
  2. S. Huş, Wood adhesives, Istanbul, Turkey, Istanbul University Forest Faculty Publications, 1977
  3. S.N. Kartal, and C.A. Clausen, “Leachability and decay resistance of particleboard made from acid extracted and bioremediated CCA-treated wood,” International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 183-191, 2001
  4. C. Tascioglu, M. Tufan, M. Yalcin, and S. Sen, “Determination of biological performance, dimensional stability, mechanical and thermal properties of wood–plastic composites produced from recycled chromated copper arsenate-treated wood,” Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials. vol. 29, no.11, pp. 1461-1479, 2016
  5. C. Clausen, “Improving the two-step remediation process for CCA-treated wood: Part I. Evaluating oxalic acid extraction,” Waste Management, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 401-405, 2004
  6. S. Sen, H. Hafizoglu, and M. Digrak, “Investigation of wood preservative activities of some plant extracts as fungicide,” KSU Journal of Science and Engineering, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 99-110, 2002
  7. E.D. Suttie “Novel wood preservatives,” Chemistry & Industry, vol. 18, pp. 720-724, 1997
  8. P. Viitaniemi, S. Jämsä, P. Ek, and H. Viitanen, “Method for improving biodegradation resistance and dimensional stability of cellulosic products,” U.S. Patent WO/1994/027102, 24 November, 1994
  9. G.T. Pott, D. Hueting, and J. Deursen, “A commercially attractive method to reduce moisture sensitivity of lignocellulose fibres, without the use of chemicals,” Third International Symposium Bioresource Hemp 2000 and Other Fibre Crops, Wolfsburg, Germany, 2000
  10. Test methods for determining the effectiveness of wood preservatives and their performance requirements. Japan Indusrtrial Standarts K 1571, Tokyo, Japan, 2004
  11. R. J. Gosselink, A. M. Krosse, J. van der Putten, J. van der Kolk, B. de Klerk-Engels, and J. E. van Dam, “Wood preservation by low-temperature carbonisation,” Industrial Crops and Products, Vol. 19, pp. 3–12. 2004
  12. M. Yalçın, H. H. Doğan, and Ç. Akçay, “Identification of wood‐decay fungi and assessment of damage in log depots of Western Black Sea Region (Turkey),” Forest pathology. 2019
  13. A.P. Erten, Ormancılık araştırma enstitüsü yayınları, muhtelif yayınlar serisi no: 36, Ankara. 1980
  14. A. Berkel, Y. Bozkurt, ve Y. Göker, “Kayında ardaklanma, meşede kahverengi şeritlilik ile her iki ağaç cinsinde çatlam