SavedAdd your journal

Journals / IOJET / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

INFLECTIONAL MORPHOLOGICAL AWARENESS, WORD READING AND READING COMPREHENSION OF TURKISH STUDENTS WITH LEARNING DISABILITIES

Halime Miray Sümer Dodur
Journal
IOJET
Pages
1543–1559
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, inflectional morphological awareness may be an important predictor of reading comprehension in Turkish language.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigated the contribution of inflectional morphological awareness to word reading and reading comprehension in the Turkish language.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Participants with learning disability (25 sixth-grades, 25 fourth grades) and typical development (25 sixth-grades, 25 fourth grades) were given two tasks of inflectional morphological awareness.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, inflectional morphological awareness may be an important predictor of reading comprehension in Turkish language.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study investigated the contribution of inflectional morphological awareness to word reading and reading comprehension in the Turkish language. Participants with learning disability (25 sixth-grades, 25 fourth grades) and typical development (25 sixth-grades, 25 fourth grades) were given two tasks of inflectional morphological awareness. Furthermore, word reading and reading comprehension were evaluated. The obtained data were analyzed using two factor Anova, simple correlations, regression analyses. It was revealed that possessive inflectional morphology contributed significantly to reading comprehension for students with learning disability, while two inflectional morphology task had a significant contribution to reading comprehension for all students. In conclusion, inflectional morphological awareness may be an important predictor of reading comprehension in Turkish language.

🔖

Cite This Article

Dodur, H. M. S. (2022). INFLECTIONAL MORPHOLOGICAL AWARENESS, WORD READING AND READING COMPREHENSION OF TURKISH STUDENTS WITH LEARNING DISABILITIES. IOJET, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 1543–1559. https://ajindex.com/articles/493532

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Abu-Rabia, S. (2007). The role of morphology and short vowelization in reading Arabic among normal and dyslexic readers in grades 3, 6, 9, and 12. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36, 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-006-9035-6
  2. Aksan, D. (2005). Türkçenin zenginlikleri incelikleri. Ankara: Bilgi Yayınevi.
  3. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual on mental disorders (4th ed. DSM-IV). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
  4. Berko, J. (1958). The child's learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 150-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1958.11659661
  5. Blomert, L.,Mitterer, H.,&Paffen, C. (2004). In search of the auditory, phonetic, and/or phonological problems in dyslexia: Context effects in speech perception. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1030–1047. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2004/077)
  6. Bowers, P. N., Kirby, J. R., & Deacon, S. H. (2010). The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 144–179. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F0034654309359353
  7. Carlisle, J. F. (1987). The use of morphological knowledge in spelling derived forms by learning-disabled and normal students. Annals of Dyslexia, 27, 90–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648061
  8. Carlisle, J. F. (2003). Morphology matters in learning to read: a commentary. Reading Psychology, 24, 291–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710390227369
  9. Carlisle, J. F., & Stone, C. A. (2005). Exploring the role of morphemes in word reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 428–449. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.40.4.3
  10. Casalis, S., & Luis-Alexandre, M. F. (2000). Morphological analysis, phonological analysis and learning to read French: A longitudinal study. Reading & Writing, 12, 303–335. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008177205648
  11. Casalis, S., Colé, P., & Sopo, D. (2004). Morphological awareness in developmental dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 54(1), 114–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-004-0006-z.
  12. Chung, K. K. H., Ho, C. S. H., Chan, D.W., Tsang, S. M., & Lee, S. H. (2010). Cognitive profiles of Chinese adolescents with dyslexia. Dyslexia, 16, 2–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.392
  13. De Freitas Jr, P. V., da Mota, M. M. P. E., & Deacon, S. H. (2018). Morphological awareness, word reading, and reading comprehension in Portuguese. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(3), 507-525. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716417000479
  14. Deacon, H. S., Parrila, R., & Kirby, J. R. (2008). A review of