SavedAdd your journal

Journals / IOJET / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

PRESERVICE CLASSROOM TEACHERS’ VIEWS OF DISTANCE EDUCATION SCIENCE LABORATORY ACTIVITIES

Ayten Arslan
Journal
IOJET
Pages
1729–1751
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that participants had positive and negative opinions about DESLA.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigated preservice classroom teachers’ views of distance education science laboratory (lab) activities (DESLA).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample consisted of 34 students (25 women and nine men) from the department of classroom teaching of the education faculty of a public university.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that participants had positive and negative opinions about DESLA.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study investigated preservice classroom teachers’ views of distance education science laboratory (lab) activities (DESLA). The study adopted a phenomenology design, which is a qualitative research method. The sample consisted of 34 students (25 women and nine men) from the department of classroom teaching of the education faculty of a public university. Participants were recruited using convenience sampling. Data were collected online (Google Forms) via Google Drive using an open-ended question form developed by the researcher based on a literature review and expert feedback. The data were analyzed using content analysis, a qualitative data analysis method. The results showed that participants had positive and negative opinions about DESLA. They had numerous academic, social, and professional experiences but also faced some challenges. They pointed out the pros and cons of DESLA. Most participants stated that they preferred face-to-face science lab activities to DESLA. The results also showed that DESLA improved participants’ attitudes towards science lab activities in general.

🔖

Cite This Article

Arslan, A. (2022). PRESERVICE CLASSROOM TEACHERS’ VIEWS OF DISTANCE EDUCATION SCIENCE LABORATORY ACTIVITIES. IOJET, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 1729–1751. https://ajindex.com/articles/493490

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Ak, A., Oral, B., & Topuz, V. (2018). Marmara Üniversitesi Teknik Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu uzaktan öğretim sürecinin değerlendirilmesi. Bilim, Eğitim, Sanat ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 2(1), 71-80.
  2. Akman, E., & Güler, İ., (2008).Biyomedikal mühendisliğinde uzaktan eğitim çalışmaları. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 1(2), 47-52.
  3. Akgül, G. D., Geçikli, E., Konan, F., & Konan, E., (2018). Fen Eğitiminde Sanal Laboratuvar Kullanımı Hakkında Öğretmen Adaylarının Görüşleri. Kesit Akademi Dergisi, (14), 61-74.
  4. Altıparmak, M., Kurt, İ. D., & Kapıdere, M. (2011). E-öğrenme ve uzaktan eğitimde açık kaynak kodlu öğrenme yönetim sistemleri. Akademik Bilişim’11 - XIII. Akademik Bilişim Konferansı Bildirileri Kitabı, 319-327.
  5. Angoletto, R., & Queiroz, V. C., (2020). COVID-19 and the challenges in education. The Centro de Estudos Sociedade e Tecnologia (CEST), 5, 2. Aşıksoy, G., & İşlek, D., (2017). The impact of the virtual laboratory on students' attitudes in a general physics laboratory. International Journal of Online Engineering, 13(4), 20-28.
  6. Bakioğlu, B., & Çevik, M., (2020). COVID-19 pandemisi sürecinde fen bilimleri öğretmenlerinin uzaktan eğitime ilişkin görüşleri. Turkish Studies, 15(4), 109-129. https://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.43502.
  7. Başaran, M., Doğan, E., Karaoğlu, E., & Şahin, E. (2020). Koronavirüs (Covıd-19) Pandemi Sürecinin Getirisi Olan Uzaktan Eğitimin Etkililiği Üzerine Bir Çalışma. Academia Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(2), 179-209.
  8. Bell, J., (1999). The biology labs on-line project: Producing educational simulations that promote active learning. Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer-Enhanced Learning, 1(2), 1-10.
  9. Bozkurt, E., (2008). Fizik Eğitiminde Hazırlanan Bir Sanal Laboratuvar Uygulamasının Öğrenci Başarısına Etkisi. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Selçuk Üniversitesi.
  10. Bozkurt, A., (2017). Türkiye’de uzaktan eğitimin dünü, bugünü ve yarını. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(2), 85-124.
  11. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F., (2010).
  12. Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri, Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. Chang, C.Y., (2000). Enhancing tenth graders’earth-science learning through computer- assisted instruction. Journal of Geoscience Education, 48, 636- 641. Çivril, H., (2018). Açık ve Uzaktan Öğrenmede Laboratuvar Uygulamaları. Journal of Higher Education & Science/Yüksekögretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 8(1), 41-50. Council of High Education (CHE), (2018). Sınıf öğretmenliği lisans program