SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 4

The ımpact of percıeved justıce of employees on psychologıcal capıtal: Moderatıng effect of employee well-beıng

Çalışanların örgütsel adalet algılarının psikolojik sermaye üzerine etkisi: Çalışanların iyilik halinin düzenleyici rolü

Necdet BİLGİN
Mazlum ÇELİK
Ömer TRUNÇ
Pages
559–585
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Besides, it is determined that the employees well-being level has a moderating role for the influences of the perceived justice (Distributive, procedure and interactional) on psychological capital.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to determine the effect of the employees perceived justice and well-being on psychological capital and the moderating role of well-being in this effect.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the study carried out on 683 employees in tourism sector, it is determined that both perceived justice and well-being positive and significant effect on the employees psychological capital.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Besides, it is determined that the employees well-being level has a moderating role for the influences of the perceived justice (Distributive, procedure and interactional) on psychological capital.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the effect of the employees perceived justice and well-being on psychological capital and the moderating role of well-being in this effect. According to the study carried out on 683 employees in tourism sector, it is determined that both perceived justice and well-being positive and significant effect on the employees psychological capital. Besides, it is determined that the employees well-being level has a moderating role for the influences of the perceived justice (Distributive, procedure and interactional) on psychological capital.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı çalışanların psikolojik sermaye seviyeleri üzerinde adalet algılarının ve iyilik hallerinin etkisi ve bu etkide iyilik halinin düzenleyici rolünü belirlemektir. 683 turizm sektörü çalışanı üzerinde yapılan araştırma sonucunda; çalışanların adalet algılarının hem psikolojik sermaye seviyelerini ve hem de iyilik hallerini pozitif ve anlamlı olarak etkilediği, çalışanların iyilik hallerinin de psikolojik sermaye seviyelerini pozitif ve anlamlı etkilediği tespit edilmiştir. Bunun dışında, çalışanların adalet algılarının her üç boyutunun (Prosedür, Dağıtım, Etkileşim) psikolojik sermaye seviyeleri üzerine etkisinde iyilik hallerinin düzenleyici rolünün bulunduğu belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BİLGİN, N., ÇELİK, M., TRUNÇ, Ö. (2022). The ımpact of percıeved justıce of employees on psychologıcal capıtal: Moderatıng effect of employee well-beıng. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 4, 559–585. https://ajindex.com/articles/491662

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Aiken, L. S. ve West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Los Angeles, CA: Sage. Alvin, D. F. (1987). Distributive justice and satisfaction with material well- being. American Sociological Review, 52 (1): 83-95.
  2. Annes, J. (1982). An introduction to Plato’s republic. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  3. Avey, J. B., Luthans, F., Smith, M. ve Palmer, N. F. (2010). Impact of positive psychological capital on employee well-being over time. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15 (1): 17-28.
  4. Avey, J. B., Patera, J. L. ve West, B. J. (2006). The implications of positive psychological capital on employee absenteeism. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 13 (2): 42-60.
  5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman. Baron, R. M. ve Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6): 1173-1182.
  6. Beugre, C. D. (2002). Understanding organizational justice and its impact on managing employees: An African perspective. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13 (7): 1091-1104.
  7. Bies, R. J. (2001). International (in) justice: The sacred and the profane. J. Greenberg ve R. Cropanzano (Ed.) Advances in Organization Justice: İçinde 89- 118. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
  8. Bies, R. J., ve Moag, J. F. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard ve M. Bazerman (Ed.) Research on Negotiations in Organization: İçinde 43-55.
  9. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  10. Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago, IL: Alding. Bryant, F. B. ve Cvengros, J. A. (2004). Distinguishing hope and optimism. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23 (2): 273-302.
  11. Carver, C. S. ve Scheier, M. F. (2003). Optimism. C. R. Snyder ve S. J. Lopez (Ed.) Handbook of positive psychology: İçinde 231-243. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  12. Cecil, R. ve Karla, S. (2009). Hope, optimism and self-efficacy: A system of competence and control enhancing African American college students academic well-being. Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints, 35 (2): 16-26.
  13. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G. ve Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Cohen-Charash, Y. ve Spector,