While in the testgroup, the course is performed with activities compatible with structuralist approach, in the controlgroup they are perfomed in line with the traditional approach.As a result of analysis, the differencesbetween them and the independent parameters thought to have an influence on these differences
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article measures differences structuralism shows when it is made to do the job inaccordance with the traditional approach in education.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Survey has been made over two threegroups each of which consists of two groups as the control group and test group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:While in the testgroup, the course is performed with activities compatible with structuralist approach, in the controlgroup they are perfomed in line with the traditional approach.As a result of analysis, the differencesbetween them and the independent parameters thought to have an influence on these differences
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:structuralism · Religious Culture and Ethics Course · traditional approach
Abstract
This article measures differences structuralism shows when it is made to do the job inaccordance with the traditional approach in education. Survey has been made over two threegroups each of which consists of two groups as the control group and test group. While in the testgroup, the course is performed with activities compatible with structuralist approach, in the controlgroup they are perfomed in line with the traditional approach.As a result of analysis, the differencesbetween them and the independent parameters thought to have an influence on these differences
KIZILABDULLAH, Y. (2008). Influence of Structuralism in realizing the aims of Religious Culture and Ethics Course. Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 2, 197–215. https://ajindex.com/articles/491055