Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 2

Kant’s Notion Of Religion

Kant’ın Din Anlayışı

Pages
315–330
Publication Date
2010-08-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, for Kant the only religion is morality or religion of reason

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Kant’s Notion Of ReligionKant defines religion as the recognition of all duties as divine commands.
📊
Key Findings & Data:By defining so, he calls attention to the strict relation between religion and morality.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, for Kant the only religion is morality or religion of reason
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kant · din · ahlâklılık

Abstract

Kant’s Notion Of ReligionKant defines religion as the recognition of all duties as divine commands. By defining so, he calls attention to the strict relation between religion and morality. He thinks that there is no need other than morality. He calls his view of religion as “religion of reason” and contrasts it with Christianity, which calls it as “revealed religion”. Kant accepts the possibility of revelation but rejects its reality in history. In addition, he thinks that Christianity is acceptable if and only if it is compatible with religion of reason. For Christianity to be acceptable, all its doctrines have to be interpreted according to morality. Therefore, for Kant the only religion is morality or religion of reason

Özet

Kant, dini, tüm ödevlerimizin tanrısal buyruklarmış gibi görülmesidir, şeklinde tanımlamaktadır. Bu şekilde tanımlayarak Kant, din ile ahlâk arasındaki yakın ilişkiye dikkat çekmektedir. O, din ve dindarlık için ahlâklılıktan fazla bir şeyi gerekli görmemektedir. Kant, akıl dini olarak tanımladığı kendi din anlayışını, vahyedilmiş din olarak gördüğü Hıristiyanlığın karşısına koymaktadır. O, vahyin imkânını kabul etmekte, ancak tarihsel gerçekliğini reddetmektedir. Ona göre, Hıristiyanlık ancak ve ancak akıl dinine uyduğu sürece makbuldür. Hıristiyanlığın kabul edilebilir olması için tüm öğretilerinin ahlâklılığa göre yorumlanması gerekmektedir. Dolayısıyla Kant için yegâne din, ahlâklılık veya akıl dindir

🔖

Cite This Article

TAN, N. (2010). Kant’s Notion Of Religion. Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 2, 315–330. https://ajindex.com/articles/490998

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Kant, “Immanuel, Religion Within The Boundaries of Mere Reason,” Reli- gion and Rational Theology, terc. ve ed. Allen W. Wood ve George Di Govanni, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001) içinde. ___, “Lectures on The Philosophical Doctrine of Religion,” Religion and Ra- tional Theology, terc ve ed. Allen W. Wood ve George Di Govanni, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001) içinde. ___, Pratik Aklın Eleştirisi, terc. İoanna Kuçuradi, (Ankara: Türkiye Felsefe Kurumu, 1999). ___, “The Conflict of Faculties,” Religion and Rational Theology, çev ve ed. Allen W. Wood ve George Di Govanni, (Cambridge: Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2001) içinde. O’Brien, Kelly S., “Kant and Swinburne on Revelation”, Faith and Philo- sophy, vol. 17:4 (October 2000).
  2. Rossi, Philip, “Kant’s Philosophy of Religion,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2009 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = (03.03.2010).
  3. Wolterstorff, Nicholas, “Conundrums in Kant’s Rational Religion,” Kant’s Philosophy of Religion Reconsidered, Philip J. Rossi ve Michael Wreen (ed), (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991).
  4. Wood, Allen W., “Kant’s Deism,” Kant’s Philosophy of Religion Reconside- red, Philip J. Rossi ve Michael Wreen (ed), (Bloomington: Indiana Uni- versity Press, 1991). ___, “Rational Theology, Moral Faith, and Religion,” The Cambridge Com- panion to Kant, Paul Guyer (ed), (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992). ___, “Religion, Ethical Community and the Struggle Against Evil,” Faith and Philosophy, 17:4 (October 2000).
  5. Yandell, Keith E., “Who is The True Kant?” Philosophia Christi, 9:1 (2007).