Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 1

The Formation of the Discipline of the History of Religions in France within the Context of the Catholic-Secular Controversy

Katolik-laik tartışması bağlamında Fransa’da dinler tarihi disiplininin oluşum süreci

Pages
111–136
Publication Date
2012-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus the aim of this study is to clarify the causes of these differences by tracing the formative processes of History of Religions in France with special reference to the CatholicSecular conflict

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Formation of the Discipline of the History of Religions in France within the Context of the Catholic-Secular Controversy When delineating the History of Religions, Friedrich Max Müller‟s Introduction to the Science of Religion (1883) is generally taken as a starting point and the historical development of this discipline from this date onward is chronologically presented.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This approach not only does not sufficiently emphasize the fact that History of Religions emerged and was institutionalized in each country under conditions which were peculiar to it, but also gives the impression that this discipline has gone through common developmental phases.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus the aim of this study is to clarify the causes of these differences by tracing the formative processes of History of Religions in France with special reference to the CatholicSecular conflict
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dinler Tarihi · Fransa · Katolik Kilisesi

Abstract

The Formation of the Discipline of the History of Religions in France within the Context of the Catholic-Secular Controversy When delineating the History of Religions, Friedrich Max Müller‟s Introduction to the Science of Religion (1883) is generally taken as a starting point and the historical development of this discipline from this date onward is chronologically presented. This approach not only does not sufficiently emphasize the fact that History of Religions emerged and was institutionalized in each country under conditions which were peculiar to it, but also gives the impression that this discipline has gone through common developmental phases. In fact, since History of Religions emerged in Europe in historical, social and cultural contexts that varied from country to country, as is the case in other scientific disciplines, it is viewed in different ways. For instance, the notion of History of Religions, its function, and the way in which it was perceived in academic circles in France are very different from other European countries. Thus the aim of this study is to clarify the causes of these differences by tracing the formative processes of History of Religions in France with special reference to the CatholicSecular conflict

Özet

Bilimsel bir disiplin olarak Dinler Tarihinin tarihi betimlenirken genellikle Friedrich Max Müller‟in Introduction to the Science of Religion (1873) adlı eseri başlangıç noktası olarak kabul edilmekte ve bu tarihten başlanarak bu disiplinin tarihsel gelişim safhaları kronolojik sırayla ele alınmaktadır. Bu yaklaşım, Dinler Tarihinin her ülkede kendine has şartlar altında geliştiği ve kurumsallaştığı gerçeğine yeterince vurgu yapmadığı gibi sanki bu disiplin ortak bir gelişim safhasından geçmiş izlenimi uyandırmaktadır. Oysa diğer bilim dallarında olduğu gibi Dinler Tarihi, Avrupa‟da ülkeden ülkeye farklı tarihsel, sosyal ve kültürel bağlamlarda ortaya çıktığı için doğal olarak da farklı şekillerde değerlendirilmektedir. Örneğin Fransa‟daki Dinler Tarihi anlayışı, bu disiplininin işlevi ve akademik camiada onun algılanış biçimi, diğer Avrupa ülkelerinden oldukça farklıdır. Bu çalışmanın amacı Fransa‟da Dinler Tarihi disiplininin oluşum sürecini ortaya koyarak bu farklılıkların nedenlerini açıklığa kavuşturmaktır

🔖

Cite This Article

ADIBELLİ, R. (2012). The Formation of the Discipline of the History of Religions in France within the Context of the Catholic-Secular Controversy. Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 1, 111–136. https://ajindex.com/articles/490944

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Alphandéry, Paul. “Albert Réville,” Revue de l’histoire des religions 27:54 (1906), ss.401- 423. Antes, Peter. “A Survey of New Approaches to the Study of Religion in Europe,” Peter Antes, Armin W. Geertz & R. R. Warn (ed.), New Approaches to the Study of Religion, c.1: Regional, Critical, and Historical Approaches (Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter, 2004) içinde, ss.43-61. Baubérot, Jean. “Avant-propos,” Jean Baubérot ve diğerleri (ed.), Cent ans de sciences religieuses en France (Paris: Cerf, 1987) içinde, ss.9-14. ---------. “Deux institutions de science des religions en France: la Section des Sciences Religieuses de l'Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes (EPHE), le Groupe de Sociologie des Religions,” Gerard A. Wiegers & Jan G. Platvoet (ed.), Modern Societies & the Science of Religions: Studies in Honour of Lammert Leertouwer (Leiden: Brill, 2002) içinde, ss.55-66. Baubérot, Jean ve diğerleri (ed.), Cent ans de sciences religieuses en France. Paris: Cerf, 1987.
  2. Birnbaum, Norman. “Des philosophies des religions à une sociologie des religions,” Henri Desroche & Jean Seguy (ed.), Introduction aux sciences humaines des religions (Paris: Cujas, 1970) içinde, ss.259-279.
  3. Borgeaud, Philippe. “L'histoire des religions à Genève: Origines et métamorphoses,” ASDIWAL 1 (2006), ss.13-22. André Burguière, “L‟esprit et la lettre. Les cent ans de la Ve Section,” Nouvel Observateur, n° 1142 du 26-08-1986 au 02-10-1986. Burnouf, Émile. La Science des religions. Paris, 1885. Cabanel, Patrick. “Les sciences religieuses en Europe et la formation de Franz Cumont,” Mélanges de l'Ecole française de Rome. Italie et Méditerranée 111:2 (1999), ss.611-621.
  4. Casadio, Giovanni. “Historiography: Western Europe [Further Considerations],” Encyclopedia of Religion (New York, 2005), c.6, ss. 4042-4052.
  5. Chantepie de la Saussaye, P.-D. Manuel d’histoire des religions. Paris, 1904.
  6. Daughton, J. P. An Empire Divided: Religion, Republicanism, and the Making of French Colonialism, 1880–1914. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.
  7. De Broglie, Auguste Théodore Paul. Problèmes et conclusions de l'histoire des religions. Paris, 1885. Deconchy, Jean-Pierre. “La psychologie des fait religieux,” Henri Desroche & Jean Seguy (ed.), Introduction aux sciences humaines des religions (Paris: Cujas, 1970) içinde. Despland, Michel. “Les sciences religieuses en France: des sciences que l‟on pratique mais que l‟on n‟enseigne pas,” Archives de Sciences sociales des religions 116 (2001), ss.5- 25. Desroche, H