Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 1

An Alternative Model for Islamic Religious Education: Critical Religious Education

İslam din eğitimi için alternatif bir model: eleştirel din eğitimi yaklaşımı

Pages
275–295
Publication Date
2018-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This article includes a literature review examining, first, the theological, philosophical and pedagogical basis of Critical Religious Education, then, its contributions to Islamic Religious Education

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Approach Critical Religious Education has been developed by Andrew Wright in the UK.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to this approach, religious education should aim at pursuing ‘truth’ and cultivating ‘truthfulness’.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This article includes a literature review examining, first, the theological, philosophical and pedagogical basis of Critical Religious Education, then, its contributions to Islamic Religious Education
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Eleştirel Din Eğitimi · Eleştirel Realizm · Değişkenlik Teorisi

Abstract

Approach Critical Religious Education has been developed by Andrew Wright in the UK. According to this approach, religious education should aim at pursuing ‘truth’ and cultivating ‘truthfulness’. Critical Religious Education is grounded on the three premises of the Philosophy of Critical Realism: ontological realism, epistemic relativism and judgemental rationality. Furthermore, this approach adopts the Variation Theory as a learning theory. In Critical Religious Education, the primary aim of religious education is to develop learners’ religious literacy by providing them with rational, critical and reflective thinking skills, thus helping them to make sense of their faith identity as well as those of other religious and secular worldviews in the modern world. Although being developed in a Western-liberal society, this approach is claimed also to be applied into confessional contexts. This article includes a literature review examining, first, the theological, philosophical and pedagogical basis of Critical Religious Education, then, its contributions to Islamic Religious Education

Özet

Eleştirel Din Eğitimi yaklaşımı Andrew Wright tarafından İngiltere’de geliştirilen pedagojik bir din eğitimi yaklaşımıdır. Bu yaklaşım fenomenolojik ve yapılandırmacı din eğitimi yaklaşımlarını eleştirerek din eğitimin temelinde ‘hakikati arama’ ve ‘hakikat üzere yaşama’ ideallerinin olması gerektiğini ileri sürer. Eleştirel Din Eğitimi, Eleştirel Realizm felsefesinin ontolojik realizm, epistemik rölativizm ve yargısal rasyonalite prensipleri üzerine temellendirilmiştir. Ayrıca bir öğrenme teorisi olarak Değişkenlik Teorisi benimsenmektedir. Din öğretiminde temel amaç, öğrencilere akılcı, eleştirel ve yansıtıcı düşünme becerileri kazandırarak onların dini okuryazarlık geliştirmeleri, böylece modern dünyada kendi inançları ve farklı dini ve seküler dünya görüşlerini anlamlandırabilmeleri olarak belirlenmiştir. Eleştirel Din Eğitiminin liberal eğitim sistemleri dışında, bir din veya mezhep odaklı din eğitimi sistemlerine de uygulanabileceği ileri sürülmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı Eleştirel Din Eğitimi yaklaşımının İslam Din Eğitimi’nde öğretim ve öğrenmenin geliştirilmesindeki rolünü incelemektir. Çalışma, Eleştirel Din Eğitimi’nin teolojik, felsefi ve pedagojik temellerini, sonrasında da bu yaklaşımın İslam Din Eğitimi’ne yansımalarını merkeze alan alan bir literatür araştırmasını içermektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

UÇAN, A. D. (2018). An Alternative Model for Islamic Religious Education: Critical Religious Education. Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 1, 275–295. https://ajindex.com/articles/490818

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Yousif, Ahmad. “Islam, Minorities and Religious Freedom: A Challenge to Modern Theory of Pluralism,” Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs 20:1 (2000), ss.29-41. Religious Education and Critical Realism: Knowledge, Reality and Religious Literacy. Oxon ve New York: Routledge, 2016. “Education for Theological, Religious, and Spiritual Literacy: The Challenge of Critical Realism,” Lena Roos ve Jenny Berglund (ed.), Your Heritage and Mine: Teaching in a Multi-Religious Classroom: Studies on InterReligious Relations (Uppsala: Swedish Science Press, 2008) içinde, ss.37- 52. “Contextual Religious Education and the Actuality of Religions,” British Journal of Religious Education 30:1 (2008), ss.3-12.
  2. Critical Religious Education, Multiculturalism and the Pursuit of Truth. Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 2007.
  3. Religion, Education and Post-modernity. Londra: RoutledgeFarmer, 2004. “The Spiritual Education Project: Cultivating Spiritual and Religious Literacy through a Critical Pedagogy of Religious Education,” Michael Grimmit (ed.), Pedagogies of Religious Education: Case Studies in the Research and Development of Good Pedagogical Practice in RE (Great Wakering, Essex: McCrimmons, 2000) içinde, ss.170-187. Spirituality and Education. Londra: RoutledgeFarmer, 2000.
  4. Wright, Andrew. Discerning the Spirit: Teaching Spirituality in the Religious Education Classroom. Abingdon ve Oxford: Culham College Institute, 1999. A Fresh Look at Islam in a Multi-Faith World: A Philosophy for Success Through Education. Londra: Routledge, 2015.
  5. Wilkinson, Matthew L. “Introducing Islamic Critical Realism: A Philosophy for Underlabouring Contemporary Islam,” Journal of Critical Realism 12:4 (2013), ss.419-442.
  6. Thobani, Shiraz. “Pedagogic Discourses and Imagined Communities: Knowing Islam and Being Muslim,” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 32:4 (2011), ss.531-545.
  7. Teece, Geoff. “Traversing the Gap: Andrew Wright, John Hick and Critical Religious Education,” British Journal of Religious Education 27:1 (2005), ss.29- 40. Panjwani, Farid. “Religion, Citizenship and Hope: Civic Virtues and Education about Muslim Traditions,” James Arthur, Ian Davies ve Carole Hahn (ed.), Handbook of Education for Citizenship and Democracy (Londra & Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2008) içinde, ss.292-305.
  8. Pang, Ming Fai ve Wah Ki Wing. “Revisiting the Idea of ‘Critical Aspects’,” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 60:3 (2016), ss.323-336.
  9. Pang, Ming Fai ve Ference Marton. “Learning Theo