Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 2

On The Etymology of the Words Yaʾjūj and Maʾjūj

Yeʾcūc ve Meʾcūc Kelimelerinin Etimolojisine Dair

Pages
161–169
Publication Date
2018-11-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Again, considering the fire related meanings in their etymology, Yaʾjūj and Maʾjūj/Gog and Magog can be evaluated as representatives of Satan.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The words Yaʾjūj and Maʾjūj/Gog and Magog appear in the Qur’an, Hebrew Bible and the New Testament.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although this group is generally understood to be a single structure in the Islamic tradition, it is clear that the roles of Yaʾjūj and Maʾjūj/Gog and Magog are different.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Again, considering the fire related meanings in their etymology, Yaʾjūj and Maʾjūj/Gog and Magog can be evaluated as representatives of Satan.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yeʾcūc · Meʾcūc · Yaʾjūj

Abstract

The words Yaʾjūj and Maʾjūj/Gog and Magog appear in the Qur’an, Hebrew Bible and the New Testament. Although this group is generally understood to be a single structure in the Islamic tradition, it is clear that the roles of Yaʾjūj and Maʾjūj/Gog and Magog are different. When we look at the form of the words Yaʾjūj/Gog, we see that they are in active form while the words Maʾjūj/Gog are in passive form. Hence Gog, as clearly stated in the Book of Hezekiel, should be commander and leader, and corollary Maʾjūj/Gog must be understood as the soldiers under the command of Gog. Again, considering the fire related meanings in their etymology, Yaʾjūj and Maʾjūj/Gog and Magog can be evaluated as representatives of Satan.

Özet

The words Yaʾjūj and Maʾjūj/Gog and Magog appear in the Qur’an, Hebrew Bible and the New Testament. Although this group is generally understood to be a single structure in the Islamic tradition, it is clear that the roles of Yaʾjūj and Maʾjūj/Gog and Magog are different. When we look at the form of the words Yaʾjūj/Gog, we see that they are in active form while the words Maʾjūj/Gog are in passive form. Hence Gog, as clearly stated in the Book of Hezekiel, should be commander and leader, and corollary Maʾjūj/Gog must be understood as the soldiers under the command of Gog. Again, considering the fire related meanings in their etymology, Yaʾjūj and Maʾjūj/Gog and Magog can be evaluated as representatives of Satan.

🔖

Cite This Article

Meral, Y. (2018). On The Etymology of the Words Yaʾjūj and Maʾjūj. Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 2, 161–169. https://ajindex.com/articles/490800

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. İlyas Çelebi. “Ye’cûc ve Me’cûc,” Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslâm Ansiklopedisi, c.43, ss.373-375.