Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 2

THE RELIGION-SCIENCE CONFLICT DURING HASKALAH: APPROVAL DOCUMENTS, SCIENCE BOOKS AND THE RABBINIC CLERGY

Haskala Sırasında Din-Bilim Çatışması: Onay Belgeleri, Bilim Kitapları ve Rabbani Din Adamları

Pages
113–138
Publication Date
2018-11-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is observed that this attitude started to change in later periods.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The emergence and expansion of the printing house since the 15th century led to a rapid rise in the book market.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The Haskalah movement, which emerged as a result of the Enlightenment period in Europe and aimed at the modernization of the Jewish community, produced many publications in the 18th and 19th centuries.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is observed that this attitude started to change in later periods.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Haskala · Haskama · Gelenek

Abstract

The emergence and expansion of the printing house since the 15th century led to a rapid rise in the book market. The decisions of the Christian rulers about the published works also affected the Jews living in these areas. Jews had taken some measures to protect their own religious beliefs and traditions as well as not to experience conflict with the rulers of the countries in which they live. One of them was the provision of the certificate of approval in the publication of Hebrew books. The Haskalah movement, which emerged as a result of the Enlightenment period in Europe and aimed at the modernization of the Jewish community, produced many publications in the 18th and 19th centuries. During this period, science continued to be a field of conflict between the Rabbinic clergy and the Maskilim. The effect of the Haskalah movement was tried to be minimized by the Rabbinic clergy especially in the early periods, through a system that rejects the issuance of approval documents for the publication of Hebrew science books that were accepted as potentially dangerous. It is observed that this attitude started to change in later periods.

Özet

Matbaanın 15. yüzyıldan itibaren ortaya çıkması ve yaygınlaşması, kitap piyasasının hızlı bir yükselişine neden olmuştur. Yayınlanan eserler konusunda Hıristiyan yöneticilerin kararları, buralarda yaşayan Yahudileri de etkilemiştir. Yahudiler, yaşadıkları ülkelerin idarecileri ile çatışma yaşamamak, ayrıca kendi dini inanç ve geleneklerini korumak amacıyla bazı tedbirler almışlardır. İbranice kitapların basımında onay belgesinin şart koşulması da bunlardan birisidir. Avrupa’daki Aydınlanma dönemi etkisiyle ortaya çıkan ve Yahudi toplumunun modernizasyonunu amaçlayan Haskala hareketi, etkili olduğu 18. ve 19. yüzyıllarda birçok yayın ürünü ortaya koymuştur. Bu dönem boyunca bilim, rabbani din adamları ve Maskilim arasında çatışma alanı olmaya devam etmiştir. Rabbani din adamları tarafından, özellikle ilk dönemlerde “potansiyel tehlike” olarak kabul edilen İbranice bilim kitaplarına onay belgeleri verilmeyerek Haskala hareketinin etkisi en aza indirilmeye çalışılmıştır. Sonraki dönemlerde ise bu tutumun değişmeye başladığı görülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTUNCU, A. (2018). THE RELIGION-SCIENCE CONFLICT DURING HASKALAH: APPROVAL DOCUMENTS, SCIENCE BOOKS AND THE RABBINIC CLERGY. Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 2, 113–138. https://ajindex.com/articles/490798

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Amram, David Werner. The Makers of Hebrew Book in Italy. Philadelphia: Press of Edward Stern & Co., Inc., 1909. “Approbation,” The Oxford Dictionary of the Jewish Religion, ed. R. J. Zwi Werblowsky ve Geoffrey Wigoder (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997), ss.57-58.
  2. Bloch, Samson ben Isaac. Şiviley Olam. Zholkwa: Meyerhoffer, 1828. Bosmajian, Haig A. Burning Books. Jefferson, N.C. & Londra: McFarland & Company Inc., 2006.
  3. Cohn, Haim Hermann. “Herem,” Encyclopaedia Judaica, c.9, ss.10-16.
  4. Cantor, Geoffrey. “Modern Judaism,” John Hedley Brooke ve Ronald L. Numbers (ed.), Science and Religion around the World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011) içinde, ss.44-66.
  5. Dynner, Glenn. Men of Silk: The Hasidic Conquest of Polish Jewish Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
  6. Efron, Noah J. Judaism and Science: A Historical Introduction. Londra: Greenwood Press, 2007.
  7. Eisenberg, Ronald L. Essential Figures in Jewish Scholarship. Maryland: Jason Aranson, 2014.
  8. Feiner, Shmuel. The Jewish Enlightenment. Terc. Chaya Naor. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004.
  9. Eisenberg, Ronald L. The Origins of Jewish Secularization in Eighteenth-Century Europe. Terc. Chaya Naor. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2010.
  10. Fishman, David E. Russia’s First Modern Jews: The Jews of Shklov. New York ve Londra: New York University Press, 1995.
  11. Flatto, Sharon. “19th-Century Prague: Tradition, Modernization, and Family Bonds,” Hebrew Union College Annual 87 (2016), ss.279-334.
  12. Freudenthal, Gad. “Arabic and Latin Cultures as Resources for the Hebrew Translation Movement,” Gad Freudenthal (ed.), Science in Medieval Jewish Cultures (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011) içinde, ss.74-105.
  13. Gottheil, Richard ve J. M. Hillesum. “Approbation,” The Jewish Encyclopedia, c.2, ss.27-29.
  14. Hacker, Joseph R. “Sixteenth-Century Jewish Internal Censorship of Hebrew Books,” Joseph R. Hacker ve Adam Shear (ed.), The Hebrew Book in Early Modern Italy (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011) içinde, ss.109- 120. Halevi, Avigdor ben Simcha. Sefer Davar Tov. Prag, 1783. Heller, Marvin J. Further Studies in the Making of the Early Hebrew Book. Leiden ve Boston: Brill, 2013.
  15. Heller, Marvin J. The Sixteenth Century Hebrew Book. Brill: Leiden ve Boston, 2004.
  16. Horlacher, Rebekka. “What is Bildung? or: Why Pädagogik cannot Get Away from the Concept of Bildung,” Pauli Siljander, Ari Kivela ve Ari Sutinen (ed.), Theories of Bildung and Growth: Connections and Contro