Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1

Super Efficiency Measurement In Railways: Turkey Case

Demiryollarında Süper Etkinlik Ölçümü: Türkiye Örneği

Pages
29–45
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The obtained results reveal that, while 2010 is the most efficient year worked, 1982 has turned out to be the most inefficient year worked

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Nowadays, efficiency measurement is one of the most frequently used methods to measure business performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The purpose of this study is to measure the performance of Turkish State Railways (TCDD) between the years 1975-2010 by using DEA method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The obtained results reveal that, while 2010 is the most efficient year worked, 1982 has turned out to be the most inefficient year worked
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Nowadays, efficiency measurement is one of the most frequently used methods to measure business performance. Parametric and non-parametric techniques are used for measuring efficiency. Since its flexibility and ease of interpretation, Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), a non-parametric method, is frequently preferred in studies in recent years. The purpose of this study is to measure the performance of Turkish State Railways (TCDD) between the years 1975-2010 by using DEA method. In the study, Super Efficiency application is performed in order to see the efficiency rank of decision making units (DMU) which are considered efficient through DEA application,. The obtained results reveal that, while 2010 is the most efficient year worked, 1982 has turned out to be the most inefficient year worked

Özet

Günümüzde işletme performansının ölçümünde en sık kullanılan yöntemlerden biri de etkinlik ölçümüdür. Etkinlik ölçümünde parametrik ve parametrik olmayan teknikler kullanılmaktadır. Parametrik olmayan bir yöntem olan Veri Zarflama Analizi (VZA), esnekliği ve kolay yorumlanması nedeniyle son yıllarda çalışmalarda sıkça tercih edilmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, VZA yöntemi kullanılarak Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Devlet Demiryolları İşletmesi (TCDD)' nin 1975-2010 yılları arasındaki performansının ölçülmesidir. Çalışmada ayrıca VZA uygulaması sonucunda etkin olarak değerlendirilen karar verme birimleri (KVB)' nin kendi aralarındaki etkinlik sıralamasını görebilmek amacıyla Süper Etkinlik uygulaması yapılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlar, 2010 yılının TCDD için en etkin çalışılan yıl olduğunu, 1982 yılının ise en etkinsiz çalışılan yıl olduğunu göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

PERÇİN, S., ÇAKIR, S. (2022). Super Efficiency Measurement In Railways: Turkey Case. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1, 29–45. https://ajindex.com/articles/490562

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Adler, N., L. Friedman ve Z. Stern (2002) "Review Of Ranking Methods In The Data Envelopment Analysis Context", European Journal of Operational Research, 140, 249-265.
  2. Atkinson, S.E. ve R. Halvorsen (1986), "The relative Efficiency of Public and Private Firms in a Regulated Environment: The Case of U.S. Electric Utilities", Journal of Public Economics, 29(3), 281-294.
  3. Andersen, P. ve N.C. Petersen (1993), "A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis", Management Science, 39, 1261-1264.
  4. Banker, R.D., A. Charnes ve W.W. Cooper (1984), "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis", Management Science, 30 (9), 1078-1092.
  5. Bruggink, T. H. (1982), "Public Versus Regulated Private Enterprise in the Municipal Water Industry: A Comparison of Operating Costs", Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, 22(1), 111-25.
  6. Cantos, P., J.M. Pastor ve L. Serrano (2000), "Efficiency Measures and Output Specification: The Case of European Railways", Journal of Transportation and Statistics, 3(3), 61-68.
  7. Cantos, P. ve J. Maudos (2001), "Regulation and Efficiency: The Case of European Railways", Transportation Research Part A, 35, 459-472.
  8. Caves, C. ve L. R. Christensen (1980), "The Relative Efficiency of Public and Private Firms in a Competitive Environment: The Case of Canadian Railroads", Journal of Political Economy, 88(5), 958-976.
  9. Charnes, A. W.W. Cooper ve E. Rhodes (1978), "Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units", European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429- 444. Cook, W.D. ve L.M. Seiford (2009), "Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)- Thirty Years On", European Journal of Operational Research, 192, 1-17.
  10. Cooper, William W., L.M. Seiford ve K. Tone (2000), Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software, New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  11. Cooper, William W., L.M. Seiford ve J. Zhu (2004), "Data Envelopment Analysis History, Models and Interpretations", Cooper W.W, Seiford L.M., Zhu J. (Ed), Handbook of Data Envelopment Analysis içinde (1-39), Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  12. Cowie J. (1999), "The Technical Efficiency of Public and Private Ownership in the Rail Industry: the Case of Swiss Private Railways", Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 33, 241-252.
  13. Çağlar, A. (2003), "Veri Zarflama Analizi ile Belediyelerin Etkinlik Ölçümü", Hacettepe Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara. D