SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2

Foreign policy and ethnic identities in constructivism

Konstrüktivizmde Dış politika ve etnik kimlikler

Jülide KARAKOÇ
Pages
131–160
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It argues that rule oriented constructivism demonstrates better, compared with mainstream constructivism, the ways ethnic identities affect foreign policy through its epistemological and ontological approach.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Ethnic identities are becoming more salient in the field of international relations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thus, it is important to take into account the effectiveness of ethnic identities in foreign policy analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It argues that rule oriented constructivism demonstrates better, compared with mainstream constructivism, the ways ethnic identities affect foreign policy through its epistemological and ontological approach.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Ethnic identities are becoming more salient in the field of international relations. Thus, it is important to take into account the effectiveness of ethnic identities in foreign policy analysis. This article claims that Nicholas Onuf’s rule oriented constructivism, one of the constructivist approaches, offers a useful framework for analyzing the impact of ethnic identities on foreign policy. It argues that rule oriented constructivism demonstrates better, compared with mainstream constructivism, the ways ethnic identities affect foreign policy through its epistemological and ontological approach.

Özet

Etnik kimliklerin uluslararası ilişkiler alanında görünürlükleri gittikçe artmaktadır. Farklı kimliklerin etkilerini ele almak dış politika analizinde önemli hale gelmektedir. Bu makale, konstrüktivist yaklaşımlardan Nicholas Onuf’un kural ağırlıklı konstrüktivizminin etnik kimliklerin dış politika alanındaki etkisini ele almaya uygun bir çerçeve sunduğunu ileri sürmektedir. Çalışma, kural ağırlıklı konstrüktivizmin epistemolojik ve ontolojik anlayışı ile farklı kimliklerin dış politikada etkili olma yollarını ana-akım konstrüktivizme göre daha iyi gösterdiğini savunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAKOÇ, J. (2022). Foreign policy and ethnic identities in constructivism. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2, 131–160. https://ajindex.com/articles/490549

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (28)

  1. CORNELL, S., HARTMANN, D., (1998),
  2. Enthnicity and Race, Making Identities in a Changing World, Pine Forge Press,
  3. California. ERIKSEN, T. H., (1997), “Ethnicity, race and nation”, The Ethnicity Reader, (Ed. Montserrat Guibernau ve John Rex), Polity Press, Cambridge, 33-42.
  4. ERIKSEN, T. H., (2002),
  5. Etnisite ve Milliyetçilik, Avesta Yayınları,
  6. İstanbul.
  7. GEERTZ, C., (1973),
  8. Interpretation of Cultures, Selected Essays, Basic Books, New York. GELLNER, E., (1998),
  9. Milliyetçiliğe Bakmak, İletişim Yayınları,
  10. İstanbul.
  11. GIDDENS, A., (2004), Modernliğin Sonuçları, 3. B., (Çev. E. Kuşdil), Ayrıntı Yayınları,
  12. İstanbul.
  13. HOBSBAWM, E., (2006), Milletler ve Milliyetçilik, 3. B., (Çev. O. Akınhay), Ayrıntı Yayınları,
  14. İstanbul.
  15. HOFFMAN, S., (1977), “An American Social Science: International Relations”, Daedalus, C. 106, Sayı 3, 41-60.
  16. HOPF, T., (1998), “The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory”, International Security, 23 (1), 171-200.
  17. HOROWITZ, D. L., (1985),
  18. Ethnic Groups in Conflict, University of California Press,
  19. London. HUNTINGTON, S. P., (1996), The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, Simon&Schuster, New York. KATZENSTEIN, P. J., (1996), (Ed.), The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, Columbia University Press,
  20. New York. KOSLOWSKI, R., KRATOCHWIL, F. V., (1994), “Understanding Change in International Politics: the Soviet Empire’s Demise and the International System”, International Organization, Vol. 48, No. 2. KEOHANE, R. O. ve NYE, J., (1989), Power and Interdependence, 2. B., Scott, Foresman, Boston. KEYMAN, E. F., (2000)
  21. Küreselleşme, Devlet, Kimlik/Farklılık: Uluslararası İlişkiler Kuramını Yeniden Düşünmek, (Çev. S. Coşar), Alfa Yayınları,
  22. İstanbul.
  23. KOWERT, P. A., (2001) “Toward a Constructivist Theory of Foreign Policy”, Foreign Policy in a Constructed World, (Ed. V. Kubalkova), M. E. Sharpe, New York, 266-287.
  24. KUBALKOVA, V., (2001a), “Foreign Policy, International Politics, and Constructivism”, Foreign Policy in a Constructed World, (Ed. V. Kubalkova), M. E. Sharpe, New York, 15-37.
  25. KUBALKOVA, V., (2001b), “A Constructivist Primer”, Foreign Policy in a Constructed World, (Ed. V. Kubalkova), M. E. Sharpe, New York, 56-77.
  26. MOYNIHAN, D. P., (1993), Pandaemonium: Ethnicity in International Politics, Oxford University Press,
  27. London. ONUF, N., (1989), World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations, University of South Carolina Press,
  28. Columbia. ONUF, N., (1998), “