Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

Economic Analysis of the Public Expenditures in Norway: 2000-2013

Norveç'te Kamu Harcamalarının Ekonomik Analizi: 2000-2013*

Pages
189–214
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is also seen that local administrations have a robust structure and in the aforementioned period they made 30% of the total expenditures on average.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it is aimed to make an economic analysis of the public expenditures in Norway having a buoyant private sector, a robust public economy and a developed mixed economic system.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The analyses encompasses the period of 2000-2013.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is also seen that local administrations have a robust structure and in the aforementioned period they made 30% of the total expenditures on average.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000-2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to make an economic analysis of the public expenditures in Norway having a buoyant private sector, a robust public economy and a developed mixed economic system. The analyses encompasses the period of 2000-2013. In the study, public expenditures are examined considering the functional and economic classification of general government, central government and local administrations. It is determined that public expenditures in Norway follow a stabile course between 2000 and 2013, there is a settled fiscal structure, reforms are made in public administration for the quality of services released to the public to be increased, and the country is not affected from the global financial crisis. The perception of robust social state has a crucial share in public expenditures. In the period 2000-2013 expenditures for social protection, health and education constitute 68% of total expenditures on average. It is also seen that local administrations have a robust structure and in the aforementioned period they made 30% of the total expenditures on average.

Özet

Çalışmada; hareketli bir özel sektöre, güçlü bir kamu ekonomisine ve gelişmiş bir karma ekonomik sisteme sahip olan Norveçteki kamu harcamalarının ekonomik analizinin yapılması amaçlanmaktadır. Analiz 2000-2013 yılları arasını kapsamaktadır. Çalışmada kamu harcamaları, genel hükümet, merkezi hükümet ve yerel yönetimler açısından fonksiyonel ve ekonomik sınıflandırmalar göz önünde bulundurularak değerlendirilmiştir. Norveçte 2000-2013 yılları arasında kamu harcamalarının istikrarlı bir seyir izlediği, yerleşik bir mali yapının var olduğu, halka sunulan hizmetlerin kalitesinin artırılması için kamu yönetiminde reformlar yapıldığı ve küresel finans krizinden etkilenilmediği tespit edilmiştir. Güçlü sosyal devlet anlayışı kamu harcamalarında önemli bir paya sahiptir. 2000-2013 yılları arasında sosyal koruma, sağlık ve eğitim harcamaları toplam harcamaların ortalama %68ini oluşturmaktadır. Ayrıca yerel yönetimlerin güçlü bir yapıya sahip olduğu ve söz konusu dönemde toplam harcamaların ortalama %30unu gerçekleştirdikleri görülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DİKMEN, S. (2022). Economic Analysis of the Public Expenditures in Norway: 2000-2013. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 189–214. https://ajindex.com/articles/490532

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. ANDERSON, B., CURRISTINE, T., MERK, O. (2006), "Budgeting in Norway", OECD Journal On Budgeting, 6(1), 7–45. BLOM-HANSEN, J., BORGE, L.-E., DAHLBERG, M. (2010), "Local Government in Denmark, Norway and Sweden", Local Public Sector in Transition: A Nordic Perspective, (Ed. A. Moisio), Helsinki: Government Institute for Economic Research, 95-121.
  2. ÇİÇEK, H. G., ÇİÇEK, S. (2012), "Norveç Yerel Vergi Sistemi". Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 8(16), 201–221. DFO. (2014), DFO - Norwegian Government Agency for Financial Management., http://www.dfo.no/no/Om-DFO/Om-DFO/Norwegian-Government-Agency-forFinancial-Management/, (20.12.2014).
  3. DOWLING, T., MIRCHEVA, B., NOWAK, S.,SHIRONO, K. (2014), Norway Selected Issues, 14(260), Washington DC. EDİZDOĞAN, N., ÇETİNKAYA, Ö. (2011),
  4. Kamu Bütçesi, Ekin Basım Yayın Dağıtım, Bursa. FOUBERG, E. H., HOGAN, E. P. (2004), Norway. Philadelphia: Chelsea House Publishers.
  5. GOTKOWSKA, J. (2014), Norway and the Bear Norwegian Defence Policy – Lessons for the Baltic Sea Region, Warsaw, Poland: Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich. GOVERNMENT OF NORWAY. (2000), The Main Functions of County Minicipalities and Municipalities in Norway, Publication Number H-2120 E., https://www.regjeringen.no/nb/dokumenter/Publication-number-H-2120-E/id4206 70/#1, (09.01.2015).
  6. GRYTTEN, O. H. (2014), Growth in Public Finances as Tool for Control: Norwegian Development 1850-1950, NHH Dept. of Economics Discussion Paper No. 15, Bergen. HAGEN, T. P., KAARBØE, O. M. (2004), The Norwegian Hospital Reform of 2002: Central Government Takes Over Ownership of Public Hospitals, No. Working Paper 2004:1. IMF. (2009), Norway: Report on Observance of Standards and Codes— Fiscal Transparency Module, 09/193, Washington DC: International Monetary Fund, http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2009/cr09193.pdf, (09.01.2015).
  7. JOHNSEN, J. R. (2006),
  8. Health Systems in Transition, Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, 8(1). MINISTRY OF FINANCE. (2003), Regulations on Financial Management in Central Government Provisions on Financial Management in Central Government. An English Translation of Regulations. MINISTRY OF FINANCE. (2007), The Government Pension Fund, regjeringen.no. https://www.regjeringen.no/en/topics/the-economy/the-government-pension-fund/ id1441, (20.12.2014).
  9. MUNDAL, H. (2008), Public Financial Management Performance Report - Norway, 15/2008, Oslo, 1–55. NORWEGIAN MINISTRY OF LOCAL G