Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1

Using Multicriteria Decision Making Techniques in Free Zone fo Facility Location Selection: An Example for Eastern Anatolia Region

Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Tekniklerini Kullanarak Serbe Bölge Yer Seçimi: Doğu Anadolu Bölgesi Örneği

Pages
79–113
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Accordingly; the three most important criteria for the Free Zone loca selection were proximity countries, quantity of exports and government incentives w first three provinces were respectively, Iğdır, Hakkâri and Van for Free Zone wil established.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Free Zones contribute to the prosperity of the region by increasing employm attracting foreign capital, allowing technology transfer and increasing exports.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Instudy, an application of location selection was performed for a possible Free Z established in provinces of Eastern Anatolia Region.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Accordingly; the three most important criteria for the Free Zone loca selection were proximity countries, quantity of exports and government incentives w first three provinces were respectively, Iğdır, Hakkâri and Van for Free Zone wil established.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Free Zones contribute to the prosperity of the region by increasing employm attracting foreign capital, allowing technology transfer and increasing exports. Instudy, an application of location selection was performed for a possible Free Z established in provinces of Eastern Anatolia Region. For application of the study, A TOPSIS, VIKOR and ELECTRE, which are multi criteria decision making techniques, w used. AHP was used for determine weights of the criteria that influence the Free Z location selection while TOPSIS, VIKOR and ELECTRE methods were used to r alternatives. Accordingly; the three most important criteria for the Free Zone loca selection were proximity countries, quantity of exports and government incentives w first three provinces were respectively, Iğdır, Hakkâri and Van for Free Zone wil established.

Özet

Serbest Bölgeler; istihdamı artırarak, yabancı sermaye çekerek, teknoloji transfer olanak sağlayarak ve ihracatı artırarak kurulduğu bölgenin refahına katkıda bulunur.çalışmada, Doğu Anadolu Bölgesi illerinde kurulacak olası bir Serbest Bölge için yer seç uygulaması yapılmıştır. Bu uygulama için Çok Kriterli Karar Verme tekniklerinden AH TOPSIS, VIKOR ve ELECTRE kullanılmıştır. Serbest Bölge yer seçiminde etkili ol kriterlerin ağırlıklarını belirlemek için AHP kullanılırken alternatifleri arasında sırala yapmak için TOPSIS, VIKOR ve ELECTRE yöntemleri kullanılmıştır. Buna göre; Serb Bölge yer seçiminde etkili olan en önemli üç kriter ülkelere yakınlık, ihracat miktarıdevlet teşviki olurken Serbest Bölgenin kurulacağı ilk üç il sırasıyla Iğdır, Hakkâri ve Van olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AĞAÇ, G., PEKER, İ., AR, İ. M., BAKİ, B. (2022). Using Multicriteria Decision Making Techniques in Free Zone fo Facility Location Selection: An Example for Eastern Anatolia Region. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1, 79–113. https://ajindex.com/articles/490529

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. AHRENS, J., MEYER-BAUDECK, A. (1995), “Special Economic Zones: Shortcut or Raound-aboutway Towards Capitalism”, Intereconomics, 30(2), 87-96. ARAGONÉS-BELTRÁN, P., CHAPARRO-GONZÁLEZ, F., PASTOR- FERRANDO, J. P., PLA-RUBİO, A. (2014), “An AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process)/ANP (Analytic Network Process)-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Approach for the Selection of Solar-Thermal Power Plant Investment Projects”, Energy, 66(1), 222-238.
  2. ARSLAN, İ., YAPRAKLI, S. (2007), “Serbest Bölgelerin Ekonomik Etkileri: Gaziantep Serbest Bölgesi’nin Etkilerine İlişkin Bir Saha Araştırması”, Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(2), 91-102.
  3. AY, S. (2009), “The Economic Impacts of Free Zones: The Estimation in Terms of Trade Volume, Employment and Foreign Capital of Free Zones in Turkey and Bursa Free Zone”, İş Güç Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, 11(3), 31-46.
  4. AYDIN, Ö., ÖZNEHİR, S., AKÇALI, E. (2009), “Optimal Hospital Location Selection by Analytical Hierarchical Process”, Suleyman Demirel University The Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 14(2), 69-86.
  5. BOYENGE, J. S. (2007), ILO Database on Export Processing Zones (Revised), Sectoral Activities Programme, Working Paper 251, ILO, Geneva. CHATTERJEE, P., ATHAWALE, V. M., CHAKRABORTY, S. (2010), “Selection of Industrial Robots Using Compromise Ranking and Outranking Methods”, Robotics and Comp uter-Integrated Manuf acturing, 26(5), 483-489.
  6. CHENG, E. W. L., LI, H., YU, L. (2007), “A GIS Approach to Shopping Mall Location Selection”, Building and Environment, 42(2), 884-892.
  7. CHO, K. T. (2003), “Multicriteria Decision Methods: An Attempt to Evaluate and Unify”, Mathematical and Comp uter Modelling, 37(9-10), 1099-1119.
  8. DENG, X., HU Y.,DENG Y., MAHADEVAN S. (2014), “Supplier Selection Using AHP Methodology Extended by D Numbers”, Exp ert Systems with App lications, 41(1), 156– 167. DEROSA D., RONINGEN O. V. (2002), “Rwanda as a Free Trade Zone: An Inquiry into the Economic Impacts”, Agricultural Policy Development Project Research Report, Vol:11. DİKİLİ, A. (2011), ”Türkiye Serbest Bölgeleri”, Otadoğu Analiz, 25(3), 52-59.
  9. ENGMAN, M., ONODERA, O., PINALI, E. (2007), ”Export Processing Zones: Past and Future Role in Trade and Development”, OECD Trade Policy Working Papers, Vol:53, OECD Publishing. ERBIYIK, H., ÖZCAN, S., KARABOĞA, K. (2012), “Retail Store Location Selection Problem with Multiple Analytical Hierarchy Process of Decision Making An Application in Turkey”, Procedia