DIE ONLINE-DURCHSUCHUNGSMASSNAHME IN DER DEUTSCHEN RECHTSORDNUNG MIT GESETZESÄNDERUNGEN VOM 25.05.2018 UND 24.08.2017 UND DIE DURCHFÜHRBARKEIT DIESER MASSNAHME IN DER TÜRKİSCHEN RECHTSORDNUNG
25.5.2018 VE 24.8.2017 TARİHLİ YASA DEĞİŞİKLİKLERİYLE ALMAN HUKUKUNDAKİ ONLINE ARAMA TEDBİRİ (ONLINE-DURCHSUCHUNG) VE BU TEDBİRİN TÜRKİYE’DE UYGULANABİLİRLİĞİ
Furthermore the seriousnessand the quality of interference by this measure is determined and it is searchedwhether such a criminal measure is permitted in türkish legal system.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The secret infiltration of an information technology system by means ofwhich the use of the system of a criminal can be monitored by the investigatingauthorities and its storage media can be read is ordered as a criminal measurein the Art. 49 Code of The Federal Criminal Police Office (BKAG) and in theArt. 100b Code of Criminal Procedure (StPO).In this study these provisions are examined as the legal basis for thiscriminal measure and the findings in decisions of the Federal ConstitutionalCourt (BVerfG) on the subject of the criminal measure „The secret infiltrationof an information technology system“ are stressed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The secret infiltration of an information technology system by means ofwhich the use of the system of a criminal can be monitored by the investigatingauthorities and its storage media can be read is ordered as a criminal measurein the Art. 49 Code of The Federal Criminal Police Office (BKAG) and in theArt. 100b Code of Criminal Procedure (StPO).In this study these provisions are examined as the legal basis for thiscriminal measure and the findings in decisions of the Federal ConstitutionalCourt (BVerfG) on the subject of the criminal measure „The secret infiltrationof an information technology system“ are stressed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore the seriousnessand the quality of interference by this measure is determined and it is searchedwhether such a criminal measure is permitted in türkish legal system.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
The secret infiltration of an information technology system by means ofwhich the use of the system of a criminal can be monitored by the investigatingauthorities and its storage media can be read is ordered as a criminal measurein the Art. 49 Code of The Federal Criminal Police Office (BKAG) and in theArt. 100b Code of Criminal Procedure (StPO).In this study these provisions are examined as the legal basis for thiscriminal measure and the findings in decisions of the Federal ConstitutionalCourt (BVerfG) on the subject of the criminal measure „The secret infiltrationof an information technology system“ are stressed. Furthermore the seriousnessand the quality of interference by this measure is determined and it is searchedwhether such a criminal measure is permitted in türkish legal system.
Özet
Soruşturma birimlerinin suçluların bilgisayar kullanımını denetlemesini ve bilgisayarda kayıtlı dosyalara ulaşılmasını sağlayan online arama tedbiri bir ceza hukuku tedbiri olarak Federal Kriminal Büro Kanunu’nun (BKAG) 49. maddesinde ve Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’nun (StPO) 100b maddesinde düzenlenmiştir. Bu çalışmada online arama tedbirinin yasal temelini oluşturan bu hükümler ve Alman Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin (BVerG) kararlarında bu tedbire ilişkin ortaya koyduğu tespitler incelenmiştir. Ayrıca online arama tedbirindeki müdahalenin niteliği ve ağırlığı tespit edilmiş ve böyle bir ceza hukuku tedbirinin Türk hukukunda uygulanıp uygulanamayacağı hususu araştırılmıştır.
🔖
Cite This Article
BAYRAKTAR, Ç. D. (2022). DIE ONLINE-DURCHSUCHUNGSMASSNAHME IN DER DEUTSCHEN RECHTSORDNUNG MIT GESETZESÄNDERUNGEN VOM 25.05.2018 UND 24.08.2017 UND DIE DURCHFÜHRBARKEIT DIESER MASSNAHME IN DER TÜRKİSCHEN RECHTSORDNUNG. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 415–456. https://ajindex.com/articles/490471
Aydın, Devrim: „Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’nda İtiraz“, TBB Dergisi, Zahl Nr. 65, 2006, S.61 ff. Bacaksız, Pınar/Özbek, Veli Özer: “Ceza Muhakemesi Hukukunda Arama”, Ceza Hukuku Dergisi, Band 1, Zahl Nr. 1, September 2006, S. 145-206. Bär, Wolfgang: “Telekommunikationsüberwachung und andere verdeckte Ermittlungsmaßnahmen Gesetzliche Neuregelungen zum 1.1.2008”, MultiMedia und Recht, 2008, S. 215 ff. Baum, Gerhart Rudolf/Schantz, Peter: “Die Novelle des BKA-Gesetzes Eine rechtspolitische und verfassungsrechtliche Kritik”, ZRP, 2008, S. 137 ff. Bayraktar, Çiler Damla: Eingriffe in die Privatsphäre durch technische Überwachung Ein deutsch-türkischer Vergleich anhand Art. 8 EMRK, Hamburg 2017.
Baytar, Serdal: „Koruma Tedbirlerinden Doğan Zararın Karşılanması“, TBB Dergisi, Zahl Nr. 61, 2005, S. 359 ff. Buermeyer, Ulf: „Die „Online-Durchsuchung“ Verfassungsrechtliche Grenzen des verdeckten hoheitlichen Zugriffs auf Computersysteme“, HRRS, 8/2007, S. 329 abrufbar unter http://www.hrr-strafrecht.de/hrr/archiv/07- 08/index.php?sz=7, (Stand vom 09.08.2018).
Centel, Nur/Zafer, Hamide: Ceza Muhakemesi Hukuku, 14. Auflage, 2017.
Denninger, Erhard: “Verfassungsrechtliche Grenzen des Lauschens - Der „große Lauschangriff” auf dem Prüfstand der Verfassung”, ZRP, 2004, S. 101 ff. Eifert, Martin: “Informationelle Selbstbestimmung im Internet Das BVerfG und die Online-Durchsuchungen”, NVwZ, 2008, S. 521 ff. Erdem, Mustafa Ruhan: Ceza Muhakemesinde Organize Suçlulukla Mücadelede Gizli Soruşturma Tedbirleri, (Dissertation) Ankara 2001.
Gusy, Christoph: “Gefahraufklärung zum Schutz der öffentlichen Sicherheit und Ordnung”, JA, 2011, S. 641 ff. Gusy, Christoph: “Lauschangriff und Grundgesetz”, JuS, 2004, S. 457 ff. Gusy, Christoph: “Überwachung der Telekommunikation unter Richtervorbehalt Effektiver Grundrechtsschutz oder Alibi?”, ZRP, 2003, S. 275 ff. Gülşen, Recep: „Yargıtay Kararları Işığında Hukuka Aykırı Aramada Elde Edilen Delillerin Ceza Muhakemesinde Değerlendirilmesi“, CHKD, 2015, Band 3, Zahl Nr. 2, S. 227 ff. Günther, Ralf: “Zur strafprozessualen Erhebung von Telekommunikationsdaten - Verpflichtung zur Sachverhaltsaufklärung oder verfassungsrechtlichunkalkulierbares Wagnis?”, NStZ, 2005, S. 485 ff. Hirsch, Burkhard: “Das Grundrecht auf Gewährleistung der Vertraulichkeit und Integrität informationstechnischer Systeme – Zugleich Anmerkung zu BVerfG, NJW 2008, 822,” NJOZ, 2008, S. 1907 ff. Hoeren, Thomas/Gräbig, Johannes: “Entwicklung des Internet- und Multimediarechts im Ja