Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Elektronik Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 4

Hemşirelikte Araştırma Amacına Yönelik Araştırma Yaklaşımı Seçimi

Framework of intent for selecting research approaches in nursing

Pages
189–195
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Using a framework of research intent, this paper aims to identify the different philosophical assumptions associated with different research intents and therefore provide a foundation for more informed decision making in selection of methodologies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Research in nursing is growing rapidly, and there is increased use of qualitative and mixed methods approaches to investigations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, frequently researchers’ adopt a research approach with little understanding of the philosophical assumptions underpinning their choice.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Using a framework of research intent, this paper aims to identify the different philosophical assumptions associated with different research intents and therefore provide a foundation for more informed decision making in selection of methodologies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Research in nursing is growing rapidly, and there is increased use of qualitative and mixed methods approaches to investigations. However, frequently researchers’ adopt a research approach with little understanding of the philosophical assumptions underpinning their choice. Using a framework of research intent, this paper aims to identify the different philosophical assumptions associated with different research intents and therefore provide a foundation for more informed decision making in selection of methodologies.

Özet

Hemşirelik araştırmaları giderek artış göstermekte ve araştırmalarda niteliksel ve miks method yaklaşımı kullanımında da artış görülmektedir. Bununla birlikte sıklıkla araştırmacılar seçtikleri felsefik varsayımları çok az destekleyen araştırma yaklaşımlarını benimsemektedir. Bu makalede; araştırma amacı taslağı kullanımında farklı araştırma amaçlarına yönelik farklı felsefik varsayımların tanımlanması ve dolayısıyla araştırma metodolojisi seçimine daha bilinçli karar verilmesi için temel bilgi sağlanması amaçlanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ORDİN, Y. S., WELLARD, S. (2022). Hemşirelikte Araştırma Amacına Yönelik Araştırma Yaklaşımı Seçimi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Elektronik Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 4, 189–195. https://ajindex.com/articles/490440

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Caelli, K., Ray, L., & Mill, J. (2003). ‘Clear as mud’: Toward greater clarity in generic qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(2). Article 1. Retrieved [8 September 2010] from http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/2_2/html/caellietal.htm
  2. Cheek, J. (2000). Chapter 3. Thinking and researching poststructurally, Postmodern and poststructural approaches to nursing research. (pp: 39-66). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Cohen, L., Manion L., Morrison, K.R.B. (2007). Chapter 1. The nature of inquiry-setting the field, Research methods in education. (pp: 9). New York: Routeldge. Creswell, J.W. (2009). Chapter 9. Qualitaitive procedures, Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed., pp. 173-202).
  3. Sage, Thousand Oaks. Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y. (2005). Chapter 1. Introduction the discipline and practice qualitative research, The sage handbook of Qualitative Research, (3rd edn, pp: 1-32). Canada: Sage, Newbury Park. Grant, B.M., Giddings, L.S. (2002). Making sense of methodologies: a paradigm framework for the novice researcher. Contemporary Nurse, 13, 10-28
  4. Holloway, I. (2005). Chapter 1. Is there an epistemology for qualitative research, Qualitative research in health care. McGraw Hill, pp: 1-16, Berkshire. Joanne Briggs Centre for Evidence-Based Practice (2008). Pressure sores: Part 1: Prevention of pressure related damage', Evidence-Based Practice Information Sheets for Health Professionals, 12(3). Kvale, S., Brinkmann, S. (2008). Chapter 1 Introduction to Interview Research, Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing, (2nd edn. pp. 1-20)
  5. Sage, Thousand Oaks. Lather, P. (1991). Chapter 1. Framing the issues, Getting Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogy Within the Postmodern, (pp: 1-19). New York: Routledge. Maykut, P., Morehouse, R. (1994). Chapter 1. Building a philosophic foundation for qualitative research, Beginning Qualitative Research: A Philosophic and Practical Guide, (pp: 1-6). London: The Falmer Press Law, J. (2004). Chapter 1. After method: an introduction, After method: mess in social science research. (pp: 1-16). London: Routledge. Mack, N. Woodsong, C., MacQueen, K.M., Guest, G., Namey, E. (2005). Qualitative Research Methods: a data collector’s field guide. Family Health International, North Carolina (accessed September 2010) http://www.fhi.org/nr/rdonlyres/emgox4xpcoyrysqspsgy5w w6mq7v4e44etd6toiejyxalhbmk5sdnef7fqlr3q6hlwa2ttj552 4xbn/datacollectorguideenrh.pdf ) Red