Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Elektronik Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

Hemşirelik Eğitiminde Klinik Değerlendirmeye Genel Bakış: Güçlükler ve Öneriler

General Overwiew of Clinical Evaluation in Nursing Education: Challanges and Recommendations

Pages
149–158
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this article, clinical evaluation in nursing education was discussed in general manner and factors effecting student assessment, the challenges and recommendations were given.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Nursing education consists of theoretical and practical components.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The role of nursing educators to ensure entegration of theory and practice based on care that the main responsibility of nurse.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this article, clinical evaluation in nursing education was discussed in general manner and factors effecting student assessment, the challenges and recommendations were given.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Nursing education consists of theoretical and practical components. The role of nursing educators to ensure entegration of theory and practice based on care that the main responsibility of nurse. Although, clinical practice allows nursing students to learn by doing, clinical training takes place in an environment that it is hard to control conditions effecting learning environment. This effects both clinical education and its entegral part of evaluation. In this article, clinical evaluation in nursing education was discussed in general manner and factors effecting student assessment, the challenges and recommendations were given.

Özet

Hemşirelik eğitimi teorik ve uygulamadan oluşmaktadır. Hemşire eğiticilerin görevi, hemşirenin temel sorumluluğu olan bakımdoğrultusunda, teorik ve uygulamanın bütünleşmesini sağlamaktır. Klinik eğitim, öğrencilerin yaparak ve yaşayarak öğrenmesine olanaksağlamakla birlikte, öğrenmeyi etkileyen koşulların kontrolünün sınırlı olduğu bir ortamda gerçekleşmektedir. Bu durum eğitimi ve onun birparçası olan değerlendirmeyi etkilemektedir. Bu makalede hemşirelikte klinik eğitimin değerlendirilmesi genel çerçevede ele alınmış,değerlendirmeyi etkileyen faktörlere, yaşanan güçlüklere ve önerilere yer verilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAÖZ, S. (2022). Hemşirelik Eğitiminde Klinik Değerlendirmeye Genel Bakış: Güçlükler ve Öneriler. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Elektronik Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 149–158. https://ajindex.com/articles/490373

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Baxter, P., Norman, G. (2011). Self-assessment or self deception? A lack of association between nursing students' self-assessment and performance. Journal Of Advanced Nursing, 67(11), 2406-2413.
  2. Boud, D. (1995). Enhancing Learning Through Self-Assessment. Kogan Page, London. Akataran; Gopee, N. (2000). Selfassessment and the concept of the lifelong learning nurse. British Journal of Nursing, vol 9, no 11, 724-729. Canadian Nurses Association, "Achieving excellence in professional practice," Aguide to preceptorship and mentoring, 2004,http://.cna-aiic.ca/.
  3. Carlisle, C., Kirk, S., luker, K. A. (1996). The changes in the role of the nurse educator following the formation of the links with higher education. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 24; 762-770.
  4. Carlson, E., Wann-Hansson, C., Pilhammar, E. (2009). Teaching during clinical practice: strategies and techniques used by preceptors in nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 29, 5, 522-526.
  5. Casey, D., Burke, E., Houghton, C., Mee, L., Smith, R., Van Der Putten, D., Bradley, H., Folan, M. (2011), Use of peer assessment as a student engagement strategy in nurse education. Nursing and Health Sciences, 13, 514-520.
  6. Chambers, M A. (1998). Some issues in the assessment of clinical practice: a review of the literature. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 7: 201-208.
  7. Chan, D.S.K. (2002). Association between student learning outcomes from their clinical placement and their perceptions of the social climate of the clinical learning environment. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 39; 517-524.
  8. Chapman, H. (1999). Some important limitations of competency based-education with respect to nurse education: an Australien perspective. Nurse Education Today, 19, 129- 135. Clifford, C. (1995). The role of the nurse educators; Concerns, conflicts and challenges. Nurse Education Today, 15; 11- 16. Clinton, M., Murrells, T., Robinson, S. (2005). Assessing competency in nursing: a comparison of nurses prepared through degree and diploma programmes. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 14, 82-94.
  9. Cotton, J. (1995). The theory of assessment: An introduction. Kogan Page, London Aktaran Hand, H. (2006). Assessment of learning in clinical practice. Nursing Standard, 21, 4, 48- 56. Deniz M, Karakulak S (2006). Adnan Menderes University Aydin School for Health Sciences. Students' expectations of teaching staff in clinical practice". 5th National Nursing Students Congress, Congress proceedings. Sanliurfa. 20-21 April. Page:188 Dolan, G. (2003). Assessi