SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2

REFLECTION OF CRAB SYNDROME ON INNOVATIVE BEHAVIORS: MEDIATOR ROLE OF PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT AND AN APPLICATION IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES ENTERPRISES

YENGEÇ SENDROMUNUN YENİLİKÇİ DAVRANIŞLAR ÜZERİNDEKİ YANSIMASI: ALGILANAN ÖRGÜTSEL DESTEĞİN ARACI ROLÜ VE BİLİŞİM TEKNOLOJİLERİ İŞLETMELERİNDE BİR UYGULAMA

Osman Seray ÖZKAN
Burcu ÜZÜM
Yasemin GÜLBAHAR
Pages
329–343
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the research, it was seen that the crab syndrome negatively predicted innovative behavior and perceived organizational support had a full mediator effect in this relation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research was conducted for the purpose of detecting the mediator role of perceived organizational support in the innovative behavior effect of the crab syndrome.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample of the research consists of 200 participants working in the IT sector.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of the research, it was seen that the crab syndrome negatively predicted innovative behavior and perceived organizational support had a full mediator effect in this relation.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yengeç Sendromu · Algılanan Örgütsel Destek · Yenilikçi Davranış

Abstract

This research was conducted for the purpose of detecting the mediator role of perceived organizational support in the innovative behavior effect of the crab syndrome. For this purpose, the study was carried out according to the screening model, one of the quantitative research designs. In the research model created based on social comparison and social change theories, the crab syndrome predictor variable, perceived organizational support mediator variable and innovative behavior outcome variable were considered. The sample of the research consists of 200 participants working in the IT sector. The hypotheses of the research were tested using the structural equation model and bootstrap method. According to the results of the research, it was seen that the crab syndrome negatively predicted innovative behavior and perceived organizational support had a full mediator effect in this relation. The contributions and limitations of the research were discussed, and suggestions for future studies were presented.

Özet

Bu çalışma, yengeç sendromunun yenilikçi davranışlara etkisinde algılanan örgütsel desteğin aracılık rolünü tespit etmek amacı ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda çalışma nicel araştırma desenlerinden tarama modeline göre yürütülmüştür. Sosyal karşılaştırma ve sosyal değişim kuramlarına dayanarak oluşturulan araştırma modelinde yengeç sendromu tahmin değişkeni, algılanan örgütsel destek aracı değişken ve yenilikçi davranış sonuç değişkeni olarak ele alınmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklemini, bilişim sektöründe çalışan 200 katılımcı oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmanın hipotezleri yapısal eşitlik modeli ve bootstrap yöntemi kullanılarak test edilmiştir. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre, yengeç sendromunun yenilikçi davranışı negatif olarak yordadığı ve algılanan örgütsel desteğin bu ilişkide tam aracı etkisinin olduğu görülmüştür. Araştırmanın katkıları ve kısıtları tartışılmış, gelecek çalışmalar için öneriler sunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKAN, O. S., ÜZÜM, B., GÜLBAHAR, Y. (2022). REFLECTION OF CRAB SYNDROME ON INNOVATIVE BEHAVIORS: MEDIATOR ROLE OF PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT AND AN APPLICATION IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES ENTERPRISES. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2, 329–343. https://ajindex.com/articles/490216

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Akalın, Ç. (2006). Duygusal örgütsel bağlılık gelişiminde çalışanların algıladıkları örgütsel destek ve ara bir değişken olarak örgüt temelli öz saygı. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi.
  2. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  3. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J. and Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184. https://doi.org/10.2307/256995
  4. Anderson, J. C. and Gerbing, D. W. (1992). Assumptions and comparative strengths of the two-step approach comment on Fornell and Yi. Sociological Methods & Research, 20(3), 321-333.
  5. Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS (3rd Edn.). New York: Routledge. Brockner, J. and Higgins, E. T. (2001). Regulatory focus theory: Implications for the study of emotions at work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 86 (1), 35-66. 2001doi:10.1006/obhd.2001.2972. Brockner, J., Higgins, E. T. and Low, M. B. (2004). Regulatory focus theory and the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), 203-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00007-7.
  6. Bagozzi, R. P. and Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
  7. Caples, C. (2016). Does the “Crabs in bucket syndrome” still exist?. https://medium.com/@CEOCaples/does-the-crabs-in-a-bucket-syndrome-still-exist-written-by-derrick-ceo-caples-4b823b2297ff (erişim tarihi: 10.11.2018).
  8. Cropanzano, R. and Mitchell, M.S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900. doi:10.1177/0149206305279602 Chin, W. W. (1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling, MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 7-16.
  9. DeJong, J. and Den Hartog, D. (2010). Creativity and innovation management. Measuring Innovative Work Behaviour, 19(1), 23-36. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x Dirican, A. H. (2020). İstismarcı yönetim ve psikolojik sözleşme ihlalinin çalışanların işe gömülmüşlükleri üzerine etkisinde algılanan örgütsel desteğin aracı rolü. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Gebze Teknik Üniversitesi.
  10. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Gebze. Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship. New York: Harper & Row. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., and Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Applied Psychology Journal, 71 (3), 500-507. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500
  11. Eisenberger, R., and Stinglhamber, F. (2011). P