Journals / Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2

INVESTIGATION OF NONLINEAR CAUSESITY BETWEEN BITCOIN, ETHEREUM PRICES AND EXCHANGE INDEXES

BİTCOİN, ETHEREUM FİYATLARI VE BORSA ENDEKSLERİ ARASINDAKİ DOĞRUSAL OLMAYAN NEDENSELLİĞİN İNCELENMESİ

Pages
185–197
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the other hand, there is a one-way causality relationship from the Ethereum price to the European stock market index.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The importance of the relationship between new financial assets and classical investment instruments is increasing.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study period covers the daily frequency data between 11/03/2020-06/04/2022, starting from the date the covid-19 pandemic was announced in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand, there is a one-way causality relationship from the Ethereum price to the European stock market index.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Borsa Endeksleri · Kripto Para Birimleri · Diks ve Panchenko Doğrusal Olmayan Nedensellik Testi

Abstract

The importance of the relationship between new financial assets and classical investment instruments is increasing. In the study, causality relationships between Bitcoin, Ethereum prices and stock market indices are examined by using Diks and Panchenko Nonlinear Causality Test. The study period covers the daily frequency data between 11/03/2020-06/04/2022, starting from the date the covid-19 pandemic was announced in Turkey. Thus, it is aimed to examine the relationship between cryptocurrencies and global financial markets in global crises with the pandemic process. The study differs from other studies in the literature, especially due to the limited number of studies on Ethereum. Looking at the results of the nonlinear causality analysis used, it has been determined that there is a bidirectional causality relationship between the world stock market index and Bitcoin price, and between the Asian stock market index and Ethereum price. In addition, it is seen that there is one-way causality to the Bitcoin price from the European and US stock market indices. At the same time, there is a one-way causality relationship from Bitcoin price to Asian stock market index. On the other hand, there is a one-way causality relationship from the Ethereum price to the European stock market index.

Özet

Yeni finansal varlıklar ile klasik yatırım enstrümanları arasındaki ilişkilerin önemi artmaktadır. Çalışmada Diks ve Panchenko Doğrusal Olmayan Nedensellik Testi kullanarak Bitcoin, Ethereum fiyatları ve borsa endeksleri arasındaki nedensellik ilişkileri incelenmektedir. Çalışma dönemi covid-19 pandemisinin Türkiye’de ilan edildiği tarihten başlayarak 11/03/2020-06/04/2022 arasındaki günlük frekanstaki verileri kapsamaktadır. Böylece pandemi süreciyle birlikte küresel çaplı krizlerde kripto para birimleri ile küresel finans piyasaları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi hedeflenmiştir. Çalışma literatürde özellikle Ethereum ile ilgili yapılmış çalışmaların kısıtlı olması sebebi ile diğer çalışmalardan ayrılmaktadır. Kullanılan doğrusal olmayan nedensellik analizi sonuçlarına bakıldığında, dünya borsa endeksi ile Bitcoin fiyatı arasında ve Asya borsa endeksi ile Ethereum fiyatı arasında çift yönlü nedensellik ilişkisi olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca Bitcoin fiyatına Avrupa ve ABD borsa endekslerinden tek yönlü nedensellik olduğu görülmektedir. Aynı zamanda Bitcoin fiyatından da Asya borsa endeksine tek yönlü nedensellik ilişkisi mevcuttur. Ethereum fiyatından ise Avrupa borsa endeksine doğru tek yönlü nedensellik ilişkisi söz konusudur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖNGEL, V. (2022). INVESTIGATION OF NONLINEAR CAUSESITY BETWEEN BITCOIN, ETHEREUM PRICES AND EXCHANGE INDEXES. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2, 185–197. https://ajindex.com/articles/490199

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Ağaçkesen, E. (2022). Bitcoin ile hisse senedi piyasaları arasındaki karşılıklı ilişkinin incelenmesi: Türkiye ve seçilmiş ülkeler. Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 5(4), 419-431. https://doi.org/10.26677/TR1010.2022.969
  2. Arslan, E. ve Güzel, G. (2021). Development of crypto coins and their place in the economy. PressAcademia Procedia (PAP), 14, 80-83. http://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2021.1491
  3. Baek, E. ve Brock, W. (1992). A general test for nonlinear Granger causality: Bivariate model, Working Paper, Iowa State University and University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI Barber, S., Boyen, X., Shi, E. ve Uzun, E. (2012). Bitter to better—how to make bitcoin a better currency. In International Conference On Financial Cryptography And Data Security (içinde 399-414).
  4. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-32946-3_29 Borri, N. (2019). Conditional tail-risk in cryptocurrency markets. Journal of Empirical Finance, 50, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2018.11.002
  5. Bouoiyour, J., Selmi, R., Tiwari, A. K. ve Olayeni, O. R. (2016). What drives Bitcoin price. Economics Bulletin, 36(2), 843-850.
  6. Brock, W. A., Dechert, W. D., Scheinkman J. A. ve LeBaron, B. (1996). A test for independence based on the correlation dimension. Econometric Reviews, 15, 197-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474939608800353
  7. Broock W.A., Hsieh D. A. ve LeBaron B. (1991). Nonlinear dynamics, chaos, and instability: Statistical theory and economic evidence. London: MIT Press.
  8. Broock, W. A., Dechert, W. ve Scheinkman, J. (1987). A test for independence based on the correlation dimension. Working Paper, University Of Winconsin At Madison, University Of Houston, And University Of Chicago. Coinmarketcap. (2022). Erişim Adresi https://coinmarketcap.com/tr/currencies/bitcoin/markets/; https://coinmarketcap.com/tr/currencies/ethereum/markets/
  9. Diks, C. ve Panchenko V. (2006). A new statistic and practical guidelines for nonparametric granger causality testing. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 30, 1647-1669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2005.08.008
  10. Dirican, C. ve Canoz, İ. (2017). The cointegration relationship between Bitcoin prices and major world stock indices: An analysis with ARDL model approach. Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting (JEFA), 4(4), 377-392. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.748
  11. Dyhrberg, A. H. (2016). Hedging capabilities of Bitcoin. Is it the virtual gold?. Finance Research Letters, 16, 139-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2015.1