Journals / Dini Araştırmalar / 2015 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 47

ERKEN DÖNEM İBRANİ MATBAACILIĞINDA HAHAM ONAYLARI VE CEMAAT İÇİ SANSÜR

Approbation of the Rabbis in Early Hebrew Printing and Internal Censorship

Pages
96–118
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Additionally, there are some cases that rabbis intervened printing process censoring some passages that are not appropriate for the peace of community.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:As a result of well reception of printing among Jewish communities, both in Ottoman Jewish community and European Jewish communities printed many books in different fields.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the course of time, there appeared the necessity of supervision over the books printed in the printing houses for religious approvals.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Additionally, there are some cases that rabbis intervened printing process censoring some passages that are not appropriate for the peace of community.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

As a result of well reception of printing among Jewish communities, both in Ottoman Jewish community and European Jewish communities printed many books in different fields. In the course of time, there appeared the necessity of supervision over the books printed in the printing houses for religious approvals. Rabbis of several cities stipulate that for every kind of book an approbation should be received by the religious council of that city. Doing so, they planned to fortify their authority over their communitiesi. But this decisions resulted many problems including fake approbations. Additionally, there are some cases that rabbis intervened printing process censoring some passages that are not appropriate for the peace of community.

Özet

Matbaanın Yahudi cemaatleri arasında kabul görmesinin neticesinde Osmanlı'da ve birçok Avrupa Yahudi cemaatleri arasında farklı alanlarda yoğun bir kitap bası- mı gözlenmiştir. Süreç içerisinde hahamlar matbaada basılan eserlerin dini inanç açısından uygunluğunu denetleme gereğini hissetmişlerdir. Farklı şehirlerde alınan kararlarla matbaada basılacak eserlere onay alınmasını zorunlu kılan hahamlar böylelikle otoritelerini de pekiştirmek istemişlerdir. Bu durum sahte onay mektupları gibi birçok sorunu da beraberinde getirmiştir. Buna ilaveten hahamların basılan eserlere sansür uygulamaları ve basım sürecinde metne müdaheleler de Yahudi cemaatler arasında karşılaşılan durumlardandır.

🔖

Cite This Article

MERAL, Y. (2022). ERKEN DÖNEM İBRANİ MATBAACILIĞINDA HAHAM ONAYLARI VE CEMAAT İÇİ SANSÜR. Dini Araştırmalar, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 47, 96–118. https://ajindex.com/articles/489463

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Assaf, Simha (1946). Mekorot u-Mehkarim be-Toldot Yisrael. Kudüs: Mosad Rav Kook. Benayahu, Meir (1971). Haskama ve Reşut be-Defusey Venetsiya. Kudüs: Ben Zvi Institute. Benayahu, Meir (1989). Mavo Le-Sefer Binyamin Zeev. Kudüs: Yad Ha-Rav is— sim. Berger, Shlomo (2013). Producing Redemption in Amsterdam. Leiden: Brill. Burnett, Stephen (1994). “Hebrew Censorship in Hanau: Mirror of Jewish— Christian Coexistence in Seventeenth-Century Germany”, The Expulsion of the Jews: 1492 and After. New York London: Garland Publishing. II: 199—222. Carlebach, Elisheva (1990). The Pursuit of the Heresy. New York: Columbia University Press.
  2. Carmilly-Weinberger, Moshe (1977). Censorship and Freedom of Expression in Jewish History. New York: Sepher-Hermon Press Inc. David Kaufman (1892). “Iggerot Rabbi Gabriel Eskeles ve Rabbi Yakov Abu— hab“, ha-Hoker mi-Kitvey Etey Mekudas le-Hohmat Yisrael. Viyana. II:14—15. Emanuel, Isaac Samuel (1964). “Pulmus Nehemya Hiyya Hayon be-Amsterdam”, Sefer Zikaron le-Yitshak ben Zvi. Kudüs: Ben Zvi Institute. II: 209-246.
  3. Eybeschütz, Rabbi Jonathan (1763). Kereti u-Feleti. Altona. Finkelstein, Louis (1964). Jewish Self Goverment in the Middle Ages, Philipp Feldheim Publishing, New York. Freiman, Aharon (1912). Al inyaney Şabtay Zvi. Berlin: Itzkowski. Gottheil, Richard, J. M. Hillesum (1902). “Haskamah”. Jewish Encyclopedia, ed. Isidore Singer, New York and London: Funk and Wagnalls Company: 27-28.
  4. Hacker, Joseph (2011). “Sixteenth-Century Jewish Internal Censorship of Heb— rew Books”, The Hebrew book in Early Modern Italy. ed. Adam Shear and Jo— seph R. Hacker, Pennsylvenia: University of Pennsylvenia Press: 109-120.
  5. Halevi, Yitshak Baruh (1897). Takanot Hahamim. Brody: Verlag der redaction des Ibri Anochi. Halperin, Israel (1990). Pinkas Vaad Arbaa Aratsot. ed. I. Bartal, Kudüs: Mosad Bialik. Horowitz, Markus (1897). Die Frankfurter rabbinerversammlung vom jahre 1603. Frankfurt. Kahana, J. Z. (1947). “Tesuvot Rabbi David Oppenheim”, Sinay 21: 228-234. David Kaufman (1892). “Iggerot Rabbi Gabriel Eskeles ve Rabbi Yakov Abu— hab“, ha-Hoker mi-Kitvey Etey Mekudas le-Hohmat Yisrael, Viyana, II: 14-15
  6. Kaufmann, David (1898). La Lutte de Naphtali Kohen contre Hayyaoun-I”, Revue Etudes des Juifs 36: 272-286.
  7. Kaufmann, David (1899). La Lutte de Naphtali Kohen contre Hayyaoun-II”, Revue Etudes des Juifs Revue Etudes des Juifs 37: 272-283.
  8. Matityahu, Benyamin ben (1539). Benyamin Zeev. Venedik. ERKEN DÖNEM İBRANİ MATBAACILIĞINDA HAHAM ONAYLARI VE C