SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

Das Münchner Motivationspsychologische Religiositäts-Inventar: Dimensionsanalytische Prüfung und Revision

MÜNCHNER MOTİVASYONEL DİNDARLIK ENVANTERİ: BOYUTSAL KONTROL VE DENETİM

Halil APAYDIN
Pages
287–312
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

So-called short Münchner Motivational Religiosity Inventory scales have been revealed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Psychology of religion in science measure of religiosity among the important issues.
📊
Key Findings & Data:At the end of the study to measure different dimensions of religiosity, and depending on these four factors have been identified 28 articles.With Article 28 of the eight dimensions of religiosity that is supposed to take place in the material was created for directions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:So-called short Münchner Motivational Religiosity Inventory scales have been revealed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Psychology of religion in science measure of religiosity among the important issues. This article, which was built on the Münchner Motivational Religiosity Inventory includes dimensional work. Validity and reliability of the items in the inventory of the previous studies and cross-validation was performed. At the end of the study to measure different dimensions of religiosity, and depending on these four factors have been identified 28 articles.With Article 28 of the eight dimensions of religiosity that is supposed to take place in the material was created for directions. Factors in addition to cross-examination of each item, the consistency between the calculated values were obtained from a statistical point of reliability and validity. So-called short Münchner Motivational Religiosity Inventory scales have been revealed.

Özet

Din psikolojisi biliminde dindarlığın ölçülmesi önemli konular arasında yer alır. Bu makale, Münchner Motivasyonel Dindarlık Envanteri üzerinde yapılmış olan boyutsal çalışmaları içermektedir. Bu envanterde yer alan maddeler geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmalarından geçirilmiş ve çapraz doğrulamaları yapılmıştır. Araştırmanın sonunda dindarlığı farklı boyutlarıyla ölçebilecek 4 faktör ve bunlara bağlı olarak 28 madde belirlenmiştir. Bu 28 madde ile dindarlığın 8 boyutta yer aldığı düşünülen yönleri için maddeler oluşturulmuştur. Her bir maddenin iç çapraz sorgulamasının yanında faktörler arası tutarlılık değerleri de hesaplanmış güvenilirlik ve geçerlilikleri istatistiksel açıdan sağlanmıştır. Böylece kısaca Münchner Motivasyonel Dindarlık Envanteri olarak isimlendirilen ölçek ortaya konmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

APAYDIN, H. (2022). Das Münchner Motivationspsychologische Religiositäts-Inventar: Dimensionsanalytische Prüfung und Revision. Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 287–312. https://ajindex.com/articles/489366

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Allemand, M. (2002). Die Bedeutung der Religiosität für das subjektive Wohlbefinden unter psychotherapeutischer Perspektive. Unveröffentlichte Lizentiatsarbeit, Universität Bern. Allemand, M., Hefti, R., Richard, M. & Münger, U. (2000). The "Munich Motives for Religiosity Inventory" (MMRI) and its relation to mentol health in a Swiss inpatient sample. Paper presented at the 31st annual meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, June 21-25, 2000,
  2. Chicago, IL. Allen, R. O. & Spilka, B. (1967). Committed and consensual religion: A specification of religion-prejudice relationships. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 6, 191-206.
  3. Allport, G. W. (1966). The religious context of prejudice. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 5, 447-457.
  4. Allport, G. W. & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 432-443.
  5. Amelang, M. & Zielinski, W. (2002). Psychologische Diagnostik und Intervention (3. Aufl.). Berlin: Springer. Batson, C. D., Schoenrade, P. A. & Ventis, W. L. (1993). Religion and the individual. A social-psychological perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
  6. Batson, C. D. & Ventis, W. L. (1982). The religious experience: A social-psychological perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
  7. Berger, P. L. (1974). Some second thoughts on substantive versus functional definitions of religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 13, 125-133.
  8. Buse, L. (1975). Dimensionen und Komponenten des Interesses. Unveröffentlichte Dissertation, Universität Hamburg. Deister, T. (2000). Krankheitsverarbeitung und religiöse Einstellungen. Ein Vergleich zwischen onkologischen, kardiologischen und HlV-Patienten. Mainz:.Grünewald. Donahue, M. J. (1985). Intrinsic and extrinsic religiousness: Review and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 400-419.
  9. Dörr, A. (1987). Religiosität und Depression. Eine empirisch-psychologische Untersuchung. Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag. Dörr, A. (1992). Religiosität und Depression. in E. Schmitz (Hrsg.), Religionspsychologie. Eine Bestandsaufnahme des gegenvvartigen Forschungsstandes (S. 159- 180). Göttingen: Hogrefe. Dörr, A. (2001). Religiosität und psychische Gesundheit. Zur Zusammenhangsstruktur spezifischer religiöser Konzepte. Hamburg: Kovac. Feagin, J. R. (1964). Prejudice and relegious [sic] types: A focused study of Southern fundamentalists. Journal for the Scientific Study ofReligion, 4, 3-13. Flam