Journals / Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

A review of mental health research religion relationships

RUH SAĞLIĞI-DİN İLİŞKİSİ ARAŞTIRMALARINA BİR BAKIŞ

Pages
59–77
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is determined that it is affected to occure different results concerning with the subjects that given meanings to concepts such as " sanity", "piety", "signs of piety" ect. and the demographic, personal and environmental features of test subjects which shop around on them in the framework of content of these concepts.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, I tried to examined the processes which are influential on the negative results of related some studies and the positive results on altered studies which are conducted about the sanity and religion relationship.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Besides, it is tried that fixing theorically the reasons of differentation of results.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is determined that it is affected to occure different results concerning with the subjects that given meanings to concepts such as " sanity", "piety", "signs of piety" ect. and the demographic, personal and environmental features of test subjects which shop around on them in the framework of content of these concepts.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, I tried to examined the processes which are influential on the negative results of related some studies and the positive results on altered studies which are conducted about the sanity and religion relationship. Besides, it is tried that fixing theorically the reasons of differentation of results. It is determined that it is affected to occure different results concerning with the subjects that given meanings to concepts such as " sanity", "piety", "signs of piety" ect. and the demographic, personal and environmental features of test subjects which shop around on them in the framework of content of these concepts.

Özet

Bu araştırmada ruh sağlığı din ilişkisi ile ilgili yapılmış olan araştırmaların bir kısmında ilişkinin pozitif diğer bir kısmında ise negatif çıkmasına etki eden süreçler ele alınmıştır. Ayrıca, sonuçların farklılaşma nedenleri teorik olarak temellendirilmeye çalışılmıştır. Konu ile ilgili farklı sonuçların ortaya çıkmasına "ruh sağlığı", "dindarlık", "dindarlık göstergeleri" vb. gibi kavramlara yüklenen anlamlar ve bu kavramların içerik sınırları ile üzerinde araştırma yapılan deneklerin demografik, kişisel ve çevresel özelliklerinin etki ettiği tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

APAYDIN, H. (2022). A review of mental health research religion relationships. Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 59–77. https://ajindex.com/articles/489359

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Allport, G.W. (1966), The religious context of prejudice. Journal fort he Scientific Study of Religion, 5, ss.447-457.
  2. Allport, G.W. (1950), The individual and his religion: a psychological interpretation, New York: Macmillan. Allport, G.W.-Ross, J.M. (1967), Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, ss.432-443.
  3. Arıcı, A. (2006), "Ergenlerde Dini Başaçıkma Yöntemi Olarak Dua", Hayati Hökelekli (Ed.), Gençlik Din ve Değerler Psikolojisi, Değerler Eğitimi Mermezi Yay., İstanbul, ss.529-557.
  4. Bateman, M.M.- Jensen, J.S. (1958), The effect of religious background on modesof handling anger, in: Journal of Social Psychology, 47, ss. 133-141.
  5. Bergin, A.E. (1991), Values and religious issues in psychotherapy and mentalhealth, in: American Psychologist,46, ss.394-403.
  6. Bucher, A. A. (2004), Psychobiographien religiöser Entwicklung Glaubensprofile zwischen Individualität und Universalität, Verlag W. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart. Çevik, Ş. (2006), "Ölüm Düşüncesi ve Ölüm Ötesiyle İlgili Dini İnançlar", Hayati Hökelekli (Ed.), Gençlik Din ve Değerler Psikolojisi, Değerler Eğitimi Mermezi Yay., İstanbul, ss.405-445.
  7. Dörr, A. (2001), Religiosität und psychische Gesundheit. Zur Zusammenhangsstruktur spezifischer religiöser Konzepte. Hamburg: Dr. Kovac. Dreger, R.M. (1952), Some personality correlates of religious attitudes as determined by projective techniques, in: Psychological Monographs 66. Ekşi, H. (2006), "Din Eğitimi Gençlik ve Kişilik", Hayati Hökelekli (Ed.), Gençlik Din ve Değerler Psikolojisi, Değerler Eğitimi Mermezi Yay., İstanbul, ss. 181-216.
  8. Ellis, A. (1992), MY current views on rationalemotive therapy (RET) and religiousness, in: Journal of Rational Emotive and Cognitive Behavior Therapy,10, ss.37-40.
  9. Ellis, A. (1983),
  10. The case against religiosity, New York: Institute for Rational-Emotive Therapt. Eşer, H. (2006), "Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Dini İnanç ve Benlik Saygısı İlişkisi", Hayati Hökelekli (Ed.), Gençlik Din ve Değerler Psikolojisi, Değerler Eğitimi Mermezi Yay., İstanbul, ss.491-528.
  11. Freud, S. (1982a), Zwangshandlungen und Religionsübungen, in: ders., Studien ausgabe, Bd., 7, Frankfurt a. M: Fischer, ss.11-21 [EA 1907].
  12. Freud, S. (1982b), Die Zukunft einer Illusion, in: ders., Studienausgabe, Bd. 9, Frankfurt a. M: Fischer, ss.13-189 [1927]
  13. Gartner, J.-Larson, D.B.-Allen, G.D. (1991), Religious commitment and mental health. A review of the empirical literatüre, in: Journal of Psychology and Theology 19