SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

Islamic Law As Islamic Ethics

İSLAM AHLAKI OLARAK İSLAM HUKUKU

A Kevin REINHART
Pages
239–260
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

He then sets forth thefour roots (usul) of legal/ethical understanding (fiqh), describes the manner inwhich a judgment (hukm) is reached in any particular case, discusses the taxonomyof such judgments, and concludes with some comments on the rela- tionwithin Islamic law and ethics of knowledge to action.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:After arguing that Islamic law is more basic to Islamic ethics than is either Islamictheology or philosophy, the author analyzes three basic terms associatedwith law (and therefore ethics): fiqh, shar and sharVah.
📊
Key Findings & Data:After arguing that Islamic law is more basic to Islamic ethics than is either Islamictheology or philosophy, the author analyzes three basic terms associatedwith law (and therefore ethics): fiqh, shar and sharVah.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:He then sets forth thefour roots (usul) of legal/ethical understanding (fiqh), describes the manner inwhich a judgment (hukm) is reached in any particular case, discusses the taxonomyof such judgments, and concludes with some comments on the rela- tionwithin Islamic law and ethics of knowledge to action.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

After arguing that Islamic law is more basic to Islamic ethics than is either Islamictheology or philosophy, the author analyzes three basic terms associatedwith law (and therefore ethics): fiqh, shar and sharVah. He then sets forth thefour roots (usul) of legal/ethical understanding (fiqh), describes the manner inwhich a judgment (hukm) is reached in any particular case, discusses the taxonomyof such judgments, and concludes with some comments on the rela- tionwithin Islamic law and ethics of knowledge to action.

Özet

Yazar, İslam Hukuku"nun İslam ahlakı için İslam Teolojisi veya felsefesinden çok daha fazla temel oluşturduğunu öne sürdükten sonra, hukukla (ve dolayısıyla ahlakla) ilişkili üç temel terimi analiz etmektedir: fıkıh, şer" ve şeriat. Daha sonra hukukî/ahlakî anlayışın (fıkıh) dört kaynağını (usul) izah etmekte, herhangi bir meselede bir yargıya (hüküm) varmayı sağlayan yöntemi açıklamakta, bu gibi hükümlerin tasnif kurallarını tartışmakta ve (makaleyi) İslam hukuku ve bilgi ahlakının davranışla ilişkisi üzerine bir takım yorumlarla neticelendirmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

REINHART, A. K. (2022). Islamic Law As Islamic Ethics. Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 239–260. https://ajindex.com/articles/489323

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Ansari, Zafar Ishaq, 1972 “Islamic juristic terminology before Shãfi'ĩ a semantic analysis with special reference to Kufa.” Arabica 19/3:255-300.
  2. Bravmann, M. M., 1972 The Spiritual Background of Early Islam: Studies in Ancient Arab Concepts. Leiden: E. J. Brill. Burton, John, 1977 The Collection of the Quran. London: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Carney, Frederick, 1983 “Some aspects of Islamic ethics.” Journal of Religion 63/2:159-174. The Encyclopedia of Islam., 1954 2nd ed. Leiden: E. J. Brill. al-Ghazãlĩ, Abu Hãmid Muhammad, n.d. al-Mustasfã min „ilm al-usŭl. Beirut: Dãr Ihyã‟ al-turãth al-arabĩ. This is a reprint of the Bulaq ed. Gibb, H.A.R., 1962 Mohammedanism: An Historical Survey. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
  4. Graf, Erwin, 1960 “Von Wesen und Werden des Islamischen Rechts.” Bustan 2:10-22. 1977 “Zur Klassifizierung der menschlichen Handlungen nach Tũsĩ. Pp. 388- 422 in XIX Deutscher Orientalistentag (vom 28 1Sept. bis 4 Oct. 1975 in Freiburg im Breisgau). Ed. Wolfgang Voigt. Weisbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag. Ibn al-Hãjib, Abũ 'Amr 'Uthmãn al-Mãliki, n.d. Kitab Muntahã al-wusul wa-l-amal fi 'ilmay al-usul wa-l-jadal. Ed. M. al-Halabi. Cairo: Matba'at al-Sa'adah. Abũ Hanĩfah, 1948, al-Rãs‟il al-saba‟ah fi al-„aqã‟id. 2nd printing. Hyderabad: Dã‟irat alMa‟ãrif. Hodgson, Marshal, 1974, The Venture of Islam. 3 vols. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  5. Hourani, George, 1964, “The Basis of the authority of consensus in Sunnite Islam.” Studia Istamica 21:13-60. al-Juwaynĩ, Imãm al-Haramayn, Abu Ma‟ãli „Abdalmalik ibn „Abdãllah., n.d. al-Burhãn fĩ Usũl ad-Din. Ms. no. 25875 in Dãr al-Kutub, Cairo. al-Khalĩl ibn Ahmad, 1968 Kitãb al-'Ayn. Ed. Abdallãh Darwish. Baghdad: Matba‟at al- 'Ani. al-Qãdir (attributed to), “al-I'tiqãd al-Qadiri” in Ibn Jawzĩ, 1938 Muntazim, 8:109-111. Hyderabad: Da'irat al-Ma'arif. -40 al-Qarãfĩ, Abu al-„Abbas Ahmad b. Idrĩs, 1938 al-Ihkãm fĩ tamyiz al-fatãwã „an al-ahkãm wa-tasarrufãt al-qadĩ wa-l-imãm. Ed. Mahmud „Arnus. Cairo: Al-Anwar Press. 1973, Sharh tanqih al-fusul fi ikhtiyar al-mahsul fi al-usul. Cairo: Maktabat alKulliyyat al Azhariyyah. Rahman, Fazlur, 1979 Islam. 2nd edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. al-Rãzĩ, Fakhr al-Din Abu Abdallah Muhammad b. „Uthman, n.d. al-Mahsũl fi Usũl alFiqh. Ms. Usũl al-fiqh 130 in Dãr al-Kutub, Cairo. Reinhart, A. Kevin, n.d. Before Revelation: Muslim Sources of Moral Knowledge. A forthcoming Harvard University dissertation. al-Sarakhsĩ, Abu Bakr Muhammad ibn Ahmad,