Journals / Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

Mysticism: Troeltsch’s Third Type of Religious Collectivities

MİSTİSİZM: TROELTSCH’ÜN ORTAYA KOYDUĞU ÜÇÜNCÜ DİNÎ TOPLULUK TİPİ

Pages
221–237
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The unstable social forms of this religion, however, are only briefly mentioned by Troeltsch

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The author shows that ―religious individualism‖, in combination with highly subjective experiences and with a tendency to renounce any religious community, is the core of Troeltsch’s third type.
📊
Key Findings & Data:He also shows that Troeltsch regards mysticism as a phenomenon of modernity which is rooted in Christianity, particularly in Protestant mysticism and Protestant spiritualism.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The unstable social forms of this religion, however, are only briefly mentioned by Troeltsch
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The author shows that ―religious individualism‖, in combination with highly subjective experiences and with a tendency to renounce any religious community, is the core of Troeltsch’s third type. He also shows that Troeltsch regards mysticism as a phenomenon of modernity which is rooted in Christianity, particularly in Protestant mysticism and Protestant spiritualism. For the author, the significance of the present discussion rests in the discovery of the importance of a religion which has relatively little external organisation. The unstable social forms of this religion, however, are only briefly mentioned by Troeltsch

Özet

Yazar, son derece öznel tecrübelerle ve herhangi bir dinî topluluğu kabul etmeme eğilimiyle birleşen -dinsel bireycilik?in, Troeltsch'ün ortaya koyduğu üçüncü tipin özü olduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca Troeltsch'ün, mistisizmi, kökleri Hıristiyanlığa, özellikle de Protestan mistisizmine ve Protestan maneviyatına kadar giden bir modernlik fenomeni addettiği de belirtilmektedir. Yazara göre bu tartışmanın önemi, haricî örgütlenmeye kısmen az yer veren bir dinin ehemmiyetinin keşfinde yatmaktadır. Bununla birlikte, bu dinin istikrarsız toplumsal biçimleri, Troeltsch tarafından kısaca zikredilmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜNAL, M. S., DAIBER, K. (2022). Mysticism: Troeltsch’s Third Type of Religious Collectivities. Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 221–237. https://ajindex.com/articles/489319

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Drescher, Hans-Georg (1993) "Zur Entstehung von Troeltschs Soziallehren", in Friedrich Wilhelm Graf ve Trutz Rendtorff (ed.) Ernst Troeltschs Soziallehren, TroeltschStudien Band 6, Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus, ss. 11-26.
  2. Fechtner, Kristian (1995) Volkskirche im neuzeitlichen Christentum: Die Bedeutung Ernst Troeltschs fureinekunftige praktisch-theologische Theorie der Kirche, TroeltschStudien Band 8. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus. Garrett, William R. (1974) "Maligned Mysticism: The Maledicted Career of Troeltsch's Third Type'', Sociological Analysis 35(3): 205-223.
  3. Gerhard, Wilfried (1975) Ernst Troeltsch als Soziologe, doktora tezi, Cologne University. Goodman, Mark Joseph (1975) "Type Methodology and Type Myth: Some Antecedents of Max Weber's Approach'', Sociological Inquiry 45(1): 45-58.
  4. Hennis, Wilhelm (1996) "Die spiritualistische Grundlegung der 'verstehenden Soziologie' Max Webers'', Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Gottingen. I. Philologisch-Historische Klasse, Jahrgang 1996, Nr. 1. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. James, William (1920) Die religiose Erfahrung in ihrer Mannigfaltigkeit, 3. Almanca baskı: Georg Wobbermin Leipzig: Hinrichs. James, William (1985) The Varieties of Religious Experience. The Works of William James. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.
  5. Jellinek, Georg (1974) ''Die Erklarung der Burger- und Menschenrechte'', Roman Schnur (ed.) Zur Geschichte der Erklarung der Menschenrechte, 2. baskı, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, ss. 1-77.
  6. Joas, Hans (1995) ''Der amerikanische Pragmatismus und die fruhe Religionssoziologie'', Volkhard Krech ve Hartmann Tyrell (ed.) Religionssoziologie um 1900, Wurzburg: Ergon, ss. 195-208.
  7. Kersten, Jens (2000) Georg Jellinek und die klassische Staatslehre.Tubingen: Mohr (Paul Siebeck). König, Matthias (2002) Menschenrechte bei Durkheim und Weber. Frankfurt/New York: Campus. McGuire, Meredith B. (1997) Religion: The Social Context, 4. baskı. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Molendijk, Arie L. (1996) Zwischen Theologie und Soziologie: Ernst Troeltschs Typen der christlichen Gemeinschaftsbildung: Kirche, Sekte, Mystik, Troeltsch-Studien Band 9. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus. Rendtorff, Trutz (1993) " 'Meine eigene Theologie ist spiritualistisch': Zur Funktion der 'Mystik' als Sozialform des modernen Christentums", Friedrich Wilhelm Graf ve Trutz Rendtorff (ed.) Ernst Troeltschs Soziallehren, Troeltsch-Studien Band 6, Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus, ss.