Journals / Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3

Religion In A Post-Secular Society

POST-SEKÜLER TOPLUMDA DİN

Pages
199–224
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this context, he is trying to establish a connection between ideas of philosophers and sociologists about the effects on political and social areas of secularism, religious belief and practical applications and situation of religion in the era of globalization.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There are claims that religion will lose or minimize its effect on all units of social life in modern and post-modern period.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore, social science experts, especially philosophers, sociologists, and sociologists of religion have conducted plenty of research about secularism.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this context, he is trying to establish a connection between ideas of philosophers and sociologists about the effects on political and social areas of secularism, religious belief and practical applications and situation of religion in the era of globalization.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

There are claims that religion will lose or minimize its effect on all units of social life in modern and post-modern period. Therefore, social science experts, especially philosophers, sociologists, and sociologists of religion have conducted plenty of research about secularism. In these discussions, some of them claimed that effectiveness of religion has reduced; others have argued that secularism has given rise to different results in the modern society and some of them have ideas that religion has a stronger role in the public and in social life. In this article, author reviews and raises a number of critical reflections on the analysis of religion in contemporary sociology but via an engagement with modern philosophy. In this context, he is trying to establish a connection between ideas of philosophers and sociologists about the effects on political and social areas of secularism, religious belief and practical applications and situation of religion in the era of globalization.

Özet

Modernizm ve sonrası dönemde hayatın bütün ünitelerinin dinden arınacağı veya dinin etkisinin minimize edileceği iddiaları vardır. Bu iddialar sosyal bilim uzmanlarını özellikle felsefeci, sosyolog ve din sosyologlarını sekülerizm üzerinde yoğunlukla akedemik üretime sevketmiştir. Bu tartışmalarda dinin etkisinin azaldığını iddia edenler olduğu gibi, kimileri de sekülerizmin post-modern toplumda farklı sonuçlar doğurduğunu ve bazen de dinin daha güçlenerek sosyal hayat alanına çıktığını iddia etmektedir. Bu makalede yazar, çağdaş sosyolojide dinin analizine ilişkin eleştirel yansımaların sayısına modern felsefeyle bağlantılı olarak bir takım eklemeler yapma girişiminde bulunmaktadır. Bu bağlamda filozof ve sosyologlar arasında konuya ilişkin üretilen bilgiler arasında sekülerizmin siyasal ve toplumsal alanda, dini inanç ve pratik uygulamalarda ve küreselleşme çağında dinin durumuna ilişkin bir bağ kurmayı da denemektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

TURNER, B. S. (2022). Religion In A Post-Secular Society. Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3, 199–224. https://ajindex.com/articles/489283

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Abercrombie, Nicolas, Hill, Stephen, and Turner, Bryan S. (1986)
  2. Sovereign Individuals of Capitalism, London: Allen&Unwin. Akbarzadeh, Shahram and Mansouri, Fethi (eds.) ( 2007 ) Islam and Political Violence. Muslim Diaspora and Radicalism in the West, London: Tauris. Barbalet, J. M. ( 1998 ) Emotion, Social Theory and Social Structure: A Macrosociological Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Baudrillard, Jean (1968) Le Syst è me des objets. Paris: Gallimard. Baudrillard, Jean (1973) Lee Miroir de la production. Paris: Casterman. Baudrillard, Jean (1981) Simulacra and Simulation: The Body in Theory. Ann Arbor: Uni- versity of Michigan Press.
  4. Beckford, James ( 2003 ) Social Theory and Religion, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Bellah, Robert N. (1964)
  6. Religious evolution, American Sociological Review 29: 358 -74. Bender, Courtney (2003) Heaven's Kitchen: Living Religion at God's Love We Deliver, Chi- cago and London: University of Chicago Press.
  7. Berger, Peter L. (1969)
  8. The Social Reality of Religion, London: Faber and Faber. Berger, Peter L. (ed.) (1999)
  9. The Desecularization of the World, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans. Bruce, Steve (1990) Pray TV: Televangelism in America, London and New York: Routled- ge. Casanova, Jos é ( 1994 ) Public Religions in the Modern World, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  10. Davis, M. ( 1992 ) Beyond Blade Runner: Urban Control - the Ecology of Fear, Westfield: Open Magazine Pamphlet Series. Debord, Guy ( 1967 ) La soci é t é du spectacle, Paris: Buchet - Chastel. Douglas, Mary ( 1966 ) Purity and Danger: An analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo, New York: Praeger. Durkheim, É mile ( 1995 ) The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. New York: Free Press.
  11. Garrad, John and Garrad, Carol ( 2009 ) Russian Orthodoxy Resurgent: Faith and Power in the New Russia, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  12. Gibson, William ( 1984 ) Neuromancer, London: Gollancz. Gill, Anthony ( 2008 ) The Political Origins of Religious Liberty, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Goldman, Merle ( 2005 ) From Comrade to Citizen: The Struggle for Political Rights in China, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  14. Habermas, Jürgen ( 2006 ) Religion in the public sphere, European Journal of Philosophy 14 ( 1 ): 1 - 25. Habermas, Jürgen and Mendieta, E. ( 2002 ) Religion and Rationality: Essays on Reason, God, and Modernity, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  15. Habermas, Jurgen and Ratzinger, Josep