SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Psikoloji Çalışmaları / 2017 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2

The Reliability and Validity Study of Emotional Security Scale

Duygusal Güvenlik Ölçeği’nin Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Ebru SAKIZ KUYUCU
Duygu Akyüz
Telat Gül Şendil
Pages
75–94
Publication Date
2017-12-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results suggest that the Emotional Security Scale (ESS) is a valid and reliable instrument with 12 items and 4 factors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to re-test the validity and reliability of the Emotional Security Scale which was developed by Davies, Forman, Rasi and Stevens (2002) and adapted to Turkish by Sakız (2011).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The participants of the study were 496 students ranging in age from 11 to 13 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results suggest that the Emotional Security Scale (ESS) is a valid and reliable instrument with 12 items and 4 factors.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2002 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Duygusal güvenlik · ebeveynler arası çatışma · geçerlik

Abstract

The aim of this study was to re-test the validity and reliability of the Emotional Security Scale which was developed by Davies, Forman, Rasi and Stevens (2002) and adapted to Turkish by Sakız (2011). The participants of the study were 496 students ranging in age from 11 to 13 years. Factor analysis revealed that there were 4 factors except behavioral dysregulation subscale. Cronbach’s Alpha internal consistency coefficients of the subscales ranged from .73 to .79. These results suggest that the Emotional Security Scale (ESS) is a valid and reliable instrument with 12 items and 4 factors.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Davies, Forman, Rasi ve Stevens (2002) tarafından geliştirilmiş̧ olan ve Sakız (2011) tarafından Türkçe uyarlaması yapılan Duygusal Güvenlik Ölçeği’nin (DGÖ) geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmasını yeniden yapmaktır. Araştırmanın örneklemini, iki farklı araştırmaya dâhil olan 11-13 yaş aralığında toplam 496 öğrenci oluşturmuştur. Yapılan faktör analizi, davranışsal düzensizlik alt boyutu dışında 4 boyut olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Alt ölçeklerin Cronbach Alfa iç tutarlık katsayıları .73 - .79 değerleri arasında bulunmuştur. Sonuçlar ışığında, 12 maddeli ve 4 faktörlü Duygusal Güvenlik Ölçeği’nin (DGÖ) geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçek olduğu düşünülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KUYUCU, E. S., Akyüz, D., Şendil, T. G. (2017). The Reliability and Validity Study of Emotional Security Scale. Psikoloji Çalışmaları, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2, 75–94. https://ajindex.com/articles/48878

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Akyüz, D. (2017). Duygusal güvenlik teorisinin farklı yaş grubundaki ergenler açısından incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. İstanbul Üniversitesi,
  2. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Cummings, E. M. & Davies P. T. (2002). Effects of marital conflict on children on recent advances and emerging themes in process-oriented research. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43(1),31-63.
  3. Cummings, E. M. & Davies P. T. (1994). Children and marital conflict: The impact of the family dispute and resolution. New York: The Guilford Press.
  4. Cummings, E. M. & Davies P. T. (2010). Marital conflict and children: An emotional security perspective. New York: The Guilford Press.
  5. Cummings, E. M., Schermerhorn, A. C., Davies, P. T., Goeke-Morey, M. C. & Cummings, J. S. (2006). Interparental discord and child adjustment: Prospective investigations of emotional security as an explanatory mechanism. Child Development, 77(1),132-152.
  6. Cummings, E. M., George, M. W., McCoy, K. P. & Davies P. T. (2012). Interparental conflict in kindergarten and adolescent adjustment: Pospective investigation of emotional security as an explanatory mechanism. Child Development, 83(5), 1703-1715.
  7. Davies, P. T. & Cummings, E. M. (1998). Exploring children’s emotional security as a mediator of the link between marital relations and child adjustment. Child Development, 69(1),124-139.
  8. Davies, P. T., Forman, E. M., Rasi, J. A. & Stevens, K. I. (2002). Assessing children’s emotional security in the interparental relationship: The security in the interparental subsystem scales. Child Development, 73(2), 544-562.
  9. Davies, P.T. & Woitach, M. J. (2008). Children’s emotional security in the interparental relationship. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(4), 269-274.
  10. Fincham, F. (1998). Child development and marital relations. Child Development, 69, 543-574.
  11. Grych, J. H. & Fincham, F. (1990). Marital conflict and children’s adjustment: A cognitive-contextual framework. Psychological Bulletin, 108,267-290.
  12. Grych, J. H. & Fincham, F. (1993). Children’s appraisals of marital conflict: Initial investigations of the cognitive-contextual framework. Child Development, 64,215-230.
  13. Harold, G. T., Shelton, K. H., Goeke-Morey, M. C. & Cummings, J. S. (2004). Marital conflict, child emotional security about family relationships and child adjustment. Social Development, 13(3), 350-375.
  14. Mann, B. J. & Gilliom, L. A., (2002). Emotional security and cognitive appraisals mediate the relationship between parents’ marital