SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2

Processing Metaphors: Models of Processing, Factors Influencing Processing Mechanisms, and Recent Studies in Turkish

Metafor Çözümleme Süreci: Çözümleme Modelleri, Çözümleme Sürecini Etkileyen Faktörler ve Türkçede Yapılan Son Çalışmalar

Fatma Nur Öztürk
Meryem Ezgi Bayramoğlu
Duygu Özge
Pages
289–312
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This systematic review demonstrates that Turkish literature is advancing with more experimental studies in the field of metaphor processing and calls on further psycholinguistic research to understand how individual differences influence the processing and acquisition of metaphors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Humans have an innate capacity to comprehend the communicative intentions behind utterances as soon as they hear them.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, there are still many unresolved questions regarding which cognitive mechanisms help people to recognize metaphorical expressions and how these mechanisms develop from childhood to adulthood.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This systematic review demonstrates that Turkish literature is advancing with more experimental studies in the field of metaphor processing and calls on further psycholinguistic research to understand how individual differences influence the processing and acquisition of metaphors.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Humans have an innate capacity to comprehend the communicative intentions behind utterances as soon as they hear them. However, there are still many unresolved questions regarding which cognitive mechanisms help people to recognize metaphorical expressions and how these mechanisms develop from childhood to adulthood. This article aims to examine two models of metaphor processing, summarizes the factors affecting the process of metaphor comprehension, and presents a literature review on metaphor processing in Turkish. This systematic review demonstrates that Turkish literature is advancing with more experimental studies in the field of metaphor processing and calls on further psycholinguistic research to understand how individual differences influence the processing and acquisition of metaphors.

Özet

İnsan zihni, sembolik ifadeleri duyduğunda milisaniyeler içinde anlamlandırabilir. Ancak hangi bilişsel süreçlerin metaforların çözümlenmesinde rol aldığı ve bu mekanizmaların çocukluktan yetişkinliğe nasıl geliştiği konusunda henüz yanıtı bilinmeyen birçok soru bulunmaktadır. Bu makale, metafor çözümleme sürecini açıklayan iki temel modeli psikodilbilim çerçevesinde inceleyerek, metafor algılama yetisinin gelişimine etki eden unsurları ve bu alanda Türkçede yapılmış çalışmaları incelemektedir. Türkçede metafor çözümlenmesi üzerine yapılan deneysel çalışmaların gitgide artmasının literatüre hız kazandırdığı görülmüştür. Bu makale, bu konuda Türkçede nörodilbilim ve psikodilbilim çerçevesinde daha çok çalışma yapılması gerektiğini göstererek, bilişsel bozukluğu olan yetişkinlerde ve atipik ve tipik gelişim gösteren çocuklarda metafor çözümleme süreçlerinin nasıl olduğu üzerine yapılacak yeni araştırmalara çağrı yapmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Öztürk, F. N., Bayramoğlu, M. E., Özge, D. (2022). Processing Metaphors: Models of Processing, Factors Influencing Processing Mechanisms, and Recent Studies in Turkish. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2, 289–312. https://ajindex.com/articles/488397

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Aksan, M. (2006). Metaphors of anger: An outline of a cultural model. Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 3(1), 31-67.
  2. Aksan, Y. & Aksan, M. (2012). Armed with patience, suffering an emotion: Conceptualization of life, morality and emotion. In F. MacArthur, J. L. Oncins-Martínez, M. Sánchez-García, & A. M. Piquer-Píriz (Eds.), Metaphor in use (pp. 285– 308). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Aksan, Y., & Kantar, D. (2008). No wellness feels better than this sickness: Love metaphors from a cross-cultural perspective. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 262-291.
  3. Arıca-Akkök, E. (2017). Turkish metaphors of anger. The Journal of the Faculty of Languages and History-Geography, 57(1), 302-326.
  4. Arıca-Akkök, E., & Uzun, İ. P. (2018). Metaphor processing in Turkish: An eye-movement study. Dil ve Edebiyat Dergisi, 15(1), 105-124.
  5. Arslan, M. M., & Bayrakçı, M. (2006). Metaforik düşünme ve öğrenme yaklaşımının eğitim-öğretim açısından incelenmesi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 35(171), 100-108.
  6. Arzouan, Y., Goldstein, A., & Faust, M. (2007). Brainwaves are stethoscopes: ERP correlates of novel metaphor comprehension. Brain Research, 1160, 69-81.
  7. Baddeley, A. D. (2002). Is working memory still working? European Psychologist, 7(2), 85-97.
  8. Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 8, 47-89.
  9. Bambini, V., Bertini, C., Schaeken, W., Stella, A., & Di Russo, F. (2016). Disentangling metaphor from context: An ERP study. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 182-195.
  10. Billow, R. M. (1975). A cognitive developmental study of metaphor comprehension. Developmental Psychology, 11(4), 415-423.
  11. Billow, R. M. (1977). Metaphor: A review of the psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 84(1), 81-92.
  12. Blasko, D. G. (1999). Only the tip of the iceberg: Who understands what about metaphor? Journal of Pragmatics, 31(12), 1675-1683.
  13. Brüne, M., & Bodenstein, L. (2005). Proverb comprehension reconsidered — ‘theory of mind’ and the pragmatic use of language in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 75(2-3), 233-239.
  14. Cacciari, C., & Glucksberg, S. (1994). Understanding figurative language. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 447-477). New York: Academic Press.
  15. Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Lemmon, K. (2005). The relation between children’s reading comprehension level and their comprehension of idioms. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 90(1), 65-87.
  16. Camp, E. (2006). Metaphor in the mind: The cognition of metaphor. Philos