Journals / Mellifera / 2020 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

Socio-Economic Determinants on The Profitability of Beekeeping Enterprises in Turkey: A Case Study in The Kelkit District of Gümüşhane

Journal
Mellifera
Pages
28–40
Publication Date
2020-06-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that the socio-economic factors affecting the gross profit of beekeepers are non-beekeeping income, production of other bee products except honey, beekeeping experience, number of hives and years of education.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Beekeeping is a branch of production that may be carried out with other agricultural activities for the rural population, and it is also one of the most significant agricultural activities because of the importance of bee products in human nutrition, their use in the chemistry industry, prospensity for treatment of diseases and the role of bees in increasing the quality of crop production.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore, other bee products besides honey production will increase their profitability.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that the socio-economic factors affecting the gross profit of beekeepers are non-beekeeping income, production of other bee products except honey, beekeeping experience, number of hives and years of education.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Beekeeping · Decision tree · Profitability

Abstract

Beekeeping is a branch of production that may be carried out with other agricultural activities for the rural population, and it is also one of the most significant agricultural activities because of the importance of bee products in human nutrition, their use in the chemistry industry, prospensity for treatment of diseases and the role of bees in increasing the quality of crop production. The aim of this study is to determine the effects of socio-economic factors on the profitability of beekeeping enterprises in the province of Gumushane in Turkey. The relationship between gross profit and some socio-economic characteristics are investigated, and the effects of socio-economic factors on profitability are analyzed by the decision tree method. The Classification and Regression Trees (CRT) algorithm is used to construct the decision tree. The results show that the socio-economic factors affecting the gross profit of beekeepers are non-beekeeping income, production of other bee products except honey, beekeeping experience, number of hives and years of education. Additionally, if the beekeeping is performed as a second source of income and with more experience, more education and working with fewer beehives will produce positive results on profitability. For producers who do not have any other income, other bee products produce more gross margin per hive. Therefore, other bee products besides honey production will increase their profitability. Considering the findings, different socio-economic characteristics should be taken into consideration in performing beekeeping as a profitable production activity.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞAN, N., ADANACIOĞLU, H., SANER, G., TAKMA, Ç. (2020). Socio-Economic Determinants on The Profitability of Beekeeping Enterprises in Turkey: A Case Study in The Kelkit District of Gümüşhane. Mellifera, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 28–40. https://ajindex.com/articles/48808

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. AFFOGNON, H; KINGORI, W S; OMONDI, A I; et al (2015) Adoption of Modern Beekeeping and Its Impact on Honey Production in the Former Mwingi District of Kenya. Inter J of Tropical Insect Sci., 35: 96-102
  2. AKSOY, A; ERTÜRK, Y E; EYTURAN, E; ERDOĞAN, S; TARIQ, M M (2018) Estimation of Honey Production in Beekeeping Enterprises from Eastern Part of Turkey Through Some Data Mining Algorithms. Pakistan J of Zoo., 50: 2200-2207
  3. BREIMAN, L; FRIEDMAN, J; OLSHEN, R; STONE, C (1984) Classification and regression trees. Chapman and Hall. Wadsworth Inc.; New York pp.216-228. [4]BÜMKO (2018): Average Exchange Rates. Available at http://www.bumko.gov.tr/TR,147/ekonomik-gostergeler.html. (20.02.2019
  4. ÇEVRİMLİ, M B; SAKARYA, E (2018) Structural Characteristics and Problems of Beekeeping Enterprises in Aegean Region Example. Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 34: 83-91, 2018
  5. DEMEN, H; KARACAOĞLU, M; KOÇ, A (2015) Beekeeping structure and problems in Diyarbakir province. Available from http://dergi.adu.edu.tr//tralleis, (10.10.2018) [in Turkish with English abstract] [7] ENGİNDENİZ, S.; UÇAR, K.; BAŞARAN, C. Economic Aspects and Problems of Beekeeping in Izmir Province. J of Agric. Econ., 20: 113-120, 2014 [in Turkish with English abstract] [8] FAO (Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations). Retrieved from: http://www.fao.org/countryprofiles/en/ (14.12.2018
  6. GRDC: Farm Gross Margin and Enterprise Planning Guide (2018): Available at https://grdc.com.au/data/assets/pdf_file/0038/294959/Farm-Gross-Margin-and- İnterprise-Planning-Guide-2018.pdf. (Accessed Nov 10, 2018
  7. GÜRER, B; AKYOL, E (2018): An Empirical Analysis of Technical Efficiency Determinants in Beekeeping Farms: Evidence and Policy Implications from Nigde, Province, Turkey. J of Agric. Environ for Intern Develop., 112: 343-359. [in Turkish with English abstract] [11] KADİRHANOĞULLARI, İH; KARADAŞ, K; KÜLEKÇİ, M. Socio-Economic Status of Beekeepers in Iğdır Province. Bee J., 16: 2-11. [in Turkish with English abstract] [12] KALANZİ, F; NANSEREKO, S; BUYİNZA, J; KIWUSO, P; TURINAVO, Y. et al Socio-Economic Analysis of Beekeeping Enterprise in Communities Adjacent to Kalinzu Forest, Western Uganda. International Journal of Research on Land-Use Sustainability, 2: 81-90. ISSN:2200-5978, 2015
  8. KARLIDAĞ, S; KÖSEMAN, S (2015) The Role and Importance of Beekeeping in Turkey and Malatya. Ministry of Food, Agric. Econ and Livestock J., 28-40. [in Turkish with English abstr