Journals / Dicle Tıp Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 3

Heterotopic gastric mucosa (inlet patch): Endoscopic prevalence andassociation with supraesophageal and upper esophageal symptoms

Heterotopik mide mukozası (inlet patch): Endoskopik prevalansı ile supraözofageal ve üst özofageal semptomlar ile ilişkisi

Pages
507–513
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Further understanding of the clinical significance of the disease may also prevent unnecessary diagnostic interventions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To determine the frequency, demographic and clinical features of the heterotopic gastric mucosa (inlet patch).Methods: This retrospective study involves 244 patients who applied to the gastroenterology outpatient clinic with different symptoms between September 2016 and December 2019, and who were diagnosed with inlet patch in elective esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:All medical records of patients including demographic and clinical features and endoscopy findings were reviewed.Results: Considering 2823 patients who underwent elective esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the same study period, inlet patch was detected in 224 (8.6%).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Further understanding of the clinical significance of the disease may also prevent unnecessary diagnostic interventions.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To determine the frequency, demographic and clinical features of the heterotopic gastric mucosa (inlet patch).Methods: This retrospective study involves 244 patients who applied to the gastroenterology outpatient clinic with different symptoms between September 2016 and December 2019, and who were diagnosed with inlet patch in elective esophagogastroduodenoscopy. All endoscopic procedures were performed by the same clinical endoscopist. All medical records of patients including demographic and clinical features and endoscopy findings were reviewed.Results: Considering 2823 patients who underwent elective esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the same study period, inlet patch was detected in 224 (8.6%). The number of male patients was 138 (56.6%) and there was no statistical difference between the two genders. The mean age of the patients was 37.73 ± 13.01 years. Single lesion was detected in 204 (83.6%) patients. The size of the largest lesion was 4.5 cm and the smallest lesion was 0.3 cm. All of the lesions were in the proximal esophagus. 54 patients (22.1%) had at least one supraesophageal or upper esophageal symptom. The most common symptom was globus sensation (64.8%). Patients with large lesions were more likely to experience symptoms (28.2% vs. 13.7%, p=0.008). Conclusion: Careful examination of the proximal esophagus may increase the chance of detecting inlet patch and may explain persistent symptoms in patients without a specific cause. Further understanding of the clinical significance of the disease may also prevent unnecessary diagnostic interventions.

Özet

Amaç: Heterotopik mide mukozasının (Inlet patch) sıklığını, demografik ve klinik özelliklerini belirlemek amaçlandı.Yöntemler: Gastroenteroloji polikliniğine Eylül 2016 ve Aralık 2019 tarihleri arasında değişik semptomlar ile başvuran,endoskopi endikasyonu konulan ve elektif olarak tek endoskopist tarafından özofagogastroduodenoskopi yapılan 2823hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. İnlet patch tespit edilen 244 hastanın verileri analiz edildi. Hastaların demografik ve kliniközellikleri ile lezyonun özellikleri kaydedildi.Bulgular: Bu çalışmada elektif özofagogastroduodenoskopi yapılan 2823 hasta göz önüne alındığında, inlet patchhastaların 224’ünde (%8,6) tespit edildi. İnlet patch tespit edilen hastaların %56,6’sı erkek olup iki cinsiyet arasındaistatistiksel fark yoktu. Hastaların yaş ortalaması 37.73 ± 13.01 yıl idi. Hastaların %83,6’sında sadece bir lezyon vardı. Enbüyük lezyonun boyutu 4.5 cm, en küçük lezyon ise 0.3 cm idi. Lezyonların hepsi proksimal özefagusta yerleşikti.Hastaların 54 (%22,1)’ünde supraözofajial ve üst özofajial semptomlardan en az biri mevcuttu. Bu semptomlardan en sıkgörüleni de globus hissi (%64,8) idi. Lezyonu büyük olan hastalarda semptom görülme ihtimali daha yüksek idi(%28,2’ye %13,7, p=0.008).Sonuç: Proksimal özofagusun dikkatli incelenmesi inlet patchin tespit etme şansını artırabilir ve bazı hastalarda belirlibir nedeni olmayan inatçı semptomları açıklayabilir. Hastalığının klinik öneminin daha fazla anlaşılması, gereksiz tanısalgirişimleri de engelleyebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

EKİN, N., BEŞTAŞ, R. (2022). Heterotopic gastric mucosa (inlet patch): Endoscopic prevalence andassociation with supraesophageal and upper esophageal symptoms. Dicle Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 3, 507–513. https://ajindex.com/articles/487322

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Jabbarı M, Goresky JA, Lough J, et al. The Inlet patch: heterotopic gastric mucosa in the upper esophagus. Gastroenterology. 1985; 89:352-6
  2. Tang P, McKinley MJ, Sporrer M, et al. Prevalence, Histologic Type and Association With Esophagitis, Barrett Esophagus, and Antritis. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004; 128: 444-7
  3. Chong HV. Clinical significance of heterotopic gastric mucosal patch of the proximal esophagus. World J Gastroenterol. 2013; 19: 331-8
  4. Chung CS, Lin CK, Liang CC, et al. Intentional examination of esophagus by narrow-band imaging endoscopy increases detection rate of cervical inlet patch. Dis Esophagus. 2015; 28: 666-72
  5. Akbayir N, Alkim C, Erdem L. Heterotopic gastric mucosa in the cervical esophagus (inlet patch): endoscopic prevalence, histological and clinical characteristics. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2004; 19: 891-6
  6. Ohara M. Incidence of heteroptopic gastric mucosa in the upper esophagus in first time narrow banding image endoscopy of consecutive 900 patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 71: 316-7
  7. Maconi G, Pace F, Vago L, et al. Prevalence and clinical features of heterotopic gastric mucosa in the upper oesophagus (inlet patch). European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2000; 12: 745-9
  8. Behrens C, Peggy PWY. Esophageal Inlet Patch. Radiology Research and Practice. 2011; 1-3
  9. Savaş N. Heterotopik Gastrik Mukoza (Gastrik İnlet Patch) Güncel gastroenteroloji. 2014; 18: 326- 9
  10. Kawada K, Kawano T, Sugimoto T, et al. Case of Superficial Cancer Located at the Pharyngoesophageal Junction Which Was Dissected by Endoscopic Laryngopharyngeal Surgery Combined with Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection. Case Rep Otolaryngol. 2017; 2017: 1-7
  11. Yoshida T, Inoue H, Usui S, et al. Narrow-band imaging system with magnifying endoscopy for superficial esophageal lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004; 59: 288-95
  12. Inoue H, Kaga M, Ikeda H, et al. Magnification endoscopy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a review of the intrapapillary capillary loop classification. Ann Gastroenterol. 2015; 28: 41-8
  13. Raine CH. Ectopic gastric mucosa in the upper esophagus as a cause of dysphagia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1983; 92: 65–6
  14. Sanchez PA, Hernando F, Diez VL, et al. Heterotopic gastric mucosa in the upper esophagus (‘‘inlet patch’’): a rare cause of esophageal perforation. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999; 94: 3047-50
  15. Poyrazoglu OK, Bahcecioglu IH, Dagli AF, et al. Heterotopic gastric mucosa (inlet p