Journals / Damar Cerrahi Dergisi / 2002 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

The midterm results of the extra-anatomic femoro-femoral bypass grafting

Femoro-femoral ekstra-anatomik bypass greft olgularımızda orta dönem sonuçlarımız

Pages
28–32
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our results also show that extraanatomic FF bypass procedure in the management of unilateral aortoiliac occlusion especially in high risk patients is a good alternative management.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:An alternative surgical procedure in the management of unilateral aortoiliac occlusion is the extraanatomic femoro femoral (F-F) bypass, especially in high risk old patients and in sexualy active patients in which sexual dysfunction is feared.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, the indications, complications, mortality and patency rates of 19 FF bypass grafts completed a 5 year period were analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our results also show that extraanatomic FF bypass procedure in the management of unilateral aortoiliac occlusion especially in high risk patients is a good alternative management.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

An alternative surgical procedure in the management of unilateral aortoiliac occlusion is the extraanatomic femoro femoral (F-F) bypass, especially in high risk old patients and in sexualy active patients in which sexual dysfunction is feared. In this study, the indications, complications, mortality and patency rates of 19 FF bypass grafts completed a 5 year period were analyzed. In our clinic elective surgical management was done in 18 patients and 1 emergency F-F bypass procedure was applied after coronary angiography only in one patient. Additionally, femoradistal bypass grafts were done in 5 patients. In our series, early graft occlusion (in 30 days postoperative period) was seen only in 1 patient (5.2%) and late graft occlusion (in 5 year period) was seen only in 4 patients (21%). Total cumulative patency rate for FF bypass grafts was 71.4% at 5 years.The mortality rates were 5.2%, 21% for 30 days early postoperative period and 5 years respectively. Early postoperative complications were seen in 3 patients; 1 was renal, 2 were inguinal wound infections. Our results also show that extraanatomic FF bypass procedure in the management of unilateral aortoiliac occlusion especially in high risk patients is a good alternative management.

Özet

Günümüzde, tek taraflı aortoiliak oklüzyonlara yaklaşımda, özellikle yüksek riskli yaşlı hastalarda ve seksüel disfonksiyon istenmeyen genç hastalarda, ekstraanatomik femorofemoral (F-F) bypass alternatif bir cerrahi yöntemdir. Bu çalışmada 5 yılını tamamlamış FF bypass greft uygulanan 19 olgudaki endikasyonlar, komplikasyonlar, mortalite ve patensi oranlarının retrospektif analizi yapılmıştır. 18 hasta elektif, 1 hasta anjiografi sonrası acil opere edilmişti. 5 hastaya ek olarak femoradistal bypass uygulanmıştır. ilk 30 günde oluşan erken oklüzyon 1 olguda (%5.2), geç greft oklüzyonu ise 4 olguda (%21) gözlendi. Total kümülatif patensi oranı 5 yılda %71.4 olarak gerçekleşti. Mortalite oranları; ilk otuz günde %5.2; 5 yılda %21 olarak bulundu. Biri akut böbrek yetmezliği, ikisi inguinal yara enfeksiyonu olmak üzere 3 olguda (%15.6) postoperatif komplikasyon görüldü. Bizim sonuçlarımız, özellikle yüksek riskli olgularda oluşan tek taraflı aortoiliak oklüzyonlarda, ekstraanatomik F-F bypass uygulamasının iyi bir alternatif yaklaşım olduğunu göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜRER, O., ENÇ, Y., YAPICI, F., ÇINAR, B., KÖSEM, M., SEZERMAN, Ö., HABERAL, İ., KIYGİL, İ. (2022). The midterm results of the extra-anatomic femoro-femoral bypass grafting. Damar Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 28–32. https://ajindex.com/articles/486859

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Nolan KD, Benjamin ME, Murphy TJ: Femorofemoral bypass for aortofemoral graft limb occlusion: A ten year experience. J Vase Surg 19: 851- 857, 1994
  2. Lorenzi G, Domain M, Costantini A: Role of bypass, endarterectomy, extraanatomic bypass and endovascular surgery in unilateral iliac occlusive disease: A review of 1257 cases. Carcliovasc Surg 2: 370- 373, 1994
  3. Takafumi M, Morris D.K, Toshihiro O, et al: Fe morofemoral bypass: An analysis of 53 femorofemoral grafts. J Vase Surg 33: 401-403, 1999
  4. Szylagyi DE, Smith RF, Elliot JP, Vrandecic MP; Infection in arterial reconstruction with synthetic grafts. Ann Surg 176: 321-333, 1972
  5. Goldstone J, Moore WS: Infection in vascular prosthesis. Clinical manifestations and surgical management. Am J Surg 6: 139-143, 1974
  6. Johnston KW, Rae M, et al. Five-years results of a prospestive study of percutaneous tranluminal angioplasty. Ann Surg 206:403-413, 1987 7. Becker GJ, KatZen BT, Dake MD, Noncoronary angioplasty. Radiology 170:921-940, 1989 8. Wilson SE, Wolf GL, Cross AP. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty versus operation for peripheral arteriosclerosis.J Vase Surg.;9:l-9, 1989 9. Brouwer JHM, Biemans MCR, Donders CPH: Long-term results of 44 crossover bypasses, J Cardiovasc Surg 29: 290-295, 1988 10. Raithel D: The femorofemoral bypass graft: An analysis of 81 femorofemoral grafts. Vascular Surgery 14: 73-77, 1980 11. Wilson ES, White HG, Wolf G, et al: Proximal percutaneous balloon angioplasty and distal bypass for multilevel arterial occlusion. Ann Vase Surg 4 351-355, 1990
  7. Kalman PG, Hosang M, Jhonston KW, Walker PM. Unilateral iliac disease: The role of iliofemoral bypass. J Vase Surg 6: 139-143, 1987
  8. Couch NP, Clowes AW, Whittemore AD, Lombra JA, Handerson BA. The iliac origin arterial graft: A useful alternative for iliac occlusive disease. Surgery 97: 83-8761985
  9. Devraigne JO, Vazquez C, Limet R: Crosssover iliofemoral bypass grafting for treatment of unilateral iliac atherosclerotic disease. J Vase Surg 30(4):693-700, 1999
  10. Piotrowski JJ, Pearce MH, Jones DN, et al. Aortabifemoral bypass: The operation of choice for unilateral iliac occlusion? J Vase. Surg 8:211-8, 1988
  11. Mingoli A, Sapienza P, Feldhaus RJ, Di Marzo L, Burchi C, Cavallaro A. Comparison of femorofemoral and aortofemoral bypass for aortoiliac occlusive disease.J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 42(3):381-7, 2001 17. Mingoli A, Sapienza P, Feldhaus RJ, Di Marzo L, Burchi C, Cavallaro A. Femorofemoral bypass g