Journals / Damar Cerrahi Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

Non-complicated central venous port catheter among 21 years without examination: Case report

21 yıl takipsiz kalmış komplikasyonsuz santral venöz port kateter: Olgu sunumu

Pages
31–34
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

By the reason of the frequent complications of the port catheters we believe that the early detection of secondary migration, calcification or the other complications is very effective to minimise morbidity and mortality of catheter using. (Turkish J Vasc Sur 2007;16(2):31-34).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Along with the increasing use of central venous catheters have come an increasing number of complications.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We reported a case whose port catheter removed after 21 years of placement.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:By the reason of the frequent complications of the port catheters we believe that the early detection of secondary migration, calcification or the other complications is very effective to minimise morbidity and mortality of catheter using. (Turkish J Vasc Sur 2007;16(2):31-34).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Along with the increasing use of central venous catheters have come an increasing number of complications. We reported a case whose port catheter removed after 21 years of placement. On the physical examination of the woman with breast cancer, there was a subcutaneus chest port on the right side of the chest. By the history of the patient, it is learned that the patient underwent surgery for cervix carcinoma in 1986; the port was placed to infuse chemotherapotics after the surgery, and she never came to the hospital since than. Modified radical mastectomy performed. The port catheter removed after 21 years of placement while preparing skin flaps. By the reason of the frequent complications of the port catheters we believe that the early detection of secondary migration, calcification or the other complications is very effective to minimise morbidity and mortality of catheter using. (Turkish J Vasc Sur 2007;16(2):31-34).

Özet

Özet Günümüzde santral venöz kateter kullanımının artmasıyla birlikte kateter kullanımına bağlı komplikasyonlarda da artış gözlenmiştir. Bu olgu sunumunda yerleştirilmesinden 21 yıl sonra port kateteri çıkarılan bir vakayı sunuyoruz. Sağ meme kanseri tanısıyla operasyon planlanan hastanın fizik muayenesinde sağ toraks duvarına implante santral venöz port kateter görüldü. Anamnezden 1986 yılında serviks karsinomu tanısıyla öpere edildiği, kemoterapi uygulamak amacıyla santral venöz kateter takıldığı, hastanın kemoterapisini aldıktan sonra bir daha hastaneye gelmediği anlaşıldı. Hastaya modifiye radikal mastektomi uygulandı. Kateter ise yerleştirilmesinden 21 yıl sonra flepler hazırlanırken çıkarıldı. Santral venöz kateter kullanımıyla ilgili komplikasyonların sıklığı ve ciddiyeti göz önüne alındığında kateterle ilişkili komplikasyonlann erken teşhisinin santral venöz kateter kullanımının mortalite ve morbiditesini azaltmada son derece etkili olabileceği görüşündeyiz. (Damar Cer Der 2007; 16(2):31-34).

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİR, A., KUTUN, S., ULUCANLAR, H., AĞAÇ, A., ÇETİN, A. (2022). Non-complicated central venous port catheter among 21 years without examination: Case report. Damar Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 31–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/486816

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Merrell SW, Peatross BG, Grossman MD, Sullivan JJ, Harker WG. Peripherally inserted central venous catheters-Low risk alternatives for ongoing venous Access. West J med 1994;160: 25-30
  2. Lois JF, Gomes AS, Pusey E. Nonsurgical repositioning of central venous catheters. Radiology 1987;165:329-333
  3. Shirotani N, Iino T, Numata K, Kameoka S. Complications of central venous catheters in patients on home parenteral nutrition: an analysis of 68 patients over 16 years. Surg Today 2006;36(5):420-4
  4. Yeste Sanchez L, Galbis Caravajal JM, Fuster Diana CA, Moledo Eiras E. Protocol for the implantation of a venous Access device (Port-A-Cath System).The complications and solutions found in 560 cases. Clin Transl Oncol 2006;8(10):735-41
  5. Roller E, Ruzicka T, Schulte KW. Subclavian thrombosis after port system implantation. Hautarzt 2007;58(1):56-61
  6. Beauregard JF, Matsumoto AH, Paul MG, Holt RW. Venobronchial fistula:A complication associated with central venous catheterization for chemotherapy. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis 1990;19:49-52
  7. Y›p D, Funaki B. Subcutaneus chest ports via the internal juguler vein. Acta radiologica 2002;43: 371-375
  8. Charyat J, Linke Z, Horaekova M, Prausova J. Implantation of central venous ports with catheter insertion via the right internal jugular vein in oncology patients:single center experience. Support Care Cancer 2006;14(11):1162-5
  9. Malm T, Eliasson H, Johansson S, Luhrs C, Hagelberg S, Hanseus K. Tricuspid valve stenosis-a serious complication to Port-a-cath.Lakartidningen 2005;102(45):3318-21. 10.Gonsalves CF, Eschelman Sullivan KL, DuBois N. Bonn J. Incidence of central vein stenosis and occlusion following upper extremity PICC and port placement. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2003;26:123-127. 11.Harter C, Salwender HJ, Bach A, Egerer G, Goldschmidt H, Ho AD. Catheter-related infection and thrombosis of the internal jugular vein in hematologic-oncologic patients undergoing chemotherapy. Cancer 2002;94:245-251. 12.Y›ld›zeli B, Lacin T, Batirel HF, Yuksel M. Complications and management of long-term central venous Access catheters and ports. J Vasc Access 2004;5(4):174-8. 13.Cil BE, Canyi¤it M, Peynircioglu B, Hazirolan T, Carkaci S, Cekirge S, Balkanci F. Subcutaneus venous port implantation in adult patients: a single center experience. Diagn Intery Radiol 2006;12(2): 93-8.