Journals / Damar Cerrahi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of wells scores with doppler ultrasound in deep vein thrombosis

Derin ven trombozunda wells skorlamasının doppler ultrason ile kıyaslanması

Pages
104–109
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When of high probability (score ? 2) and low probability (score

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a serious and frequent health problem that affects many people in the world.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The purpose of this study is to compare Doppler ultrasound data and Wells scoring, which is the most widely known and used risk score, for detection of low and high risk patients for DVT.Material and Methods: Wells scores and Doppler ultrasound results of 85 women and 64 men with the diagnosis of acute DVT were retrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When of high probability (score ? 2) and low probability (score
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a serious and frequent health problem that affects many people in the world. The purpose of this study is to compare Doppler ultrasound data and Wells scoring, which is the most widely known and used risk score, for detection of low and high risk patients for DVT.Material and Methods: Wells scores and Doppler ultrasound results of 85 women and 64 men with the diagnosis of acute DVT were retrospectively analyzed. There were 149 patients in total who were between 22 and 88 years of age. Patients with complaints more than one week and patients who had the diagnosis of DVT and under follow-up were excluded from the study. Doppler ultrasound and Wells scoring of patients were performed in the same day. The assessed prevalence of DVT in patients with each method were calculated, when Doppler ultrasound data was taken as a gold standard, then the sensitivity and specificity of Wells scoring values were calculated. Score thresholds were used while calculating these values.Results: DVT was detected with above-knee examination of Doppler ultrasound in 75 out of 149 patients who were included in this study. According to this, in patients pre diagnosed with DVT in the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery Clinic, the prevalence was 50.3%. The sensitivity and specificity of high risk score for predicting DVT were 61.3% and 60.8%, respectively. The same values were 92% and 43.2% for high-moderate risk scores. When of high probability (score ? 2) and low probability (score

Özet

Amaç: Akut derin ven trombozu (DVT), tüm dünyada birçok insanı etkileyen yaygın ve ciddi bir sağlık problemidir. Bu çalışmamızın amacı risk skorlarından en fazla bilinen ve uygulananı olan Wells skorlamasının DVT tanısı açısından düşük ve yüksek olasılıklı hasta gruplarını saptamadaki etkinliğini Doppler ultrason bulgularıyla kıyaslamaktır.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Akut DVT ön tanısı alan 85i kadın, 64ü erkek 22-88 yaş aralığındaki toplam 149 hastanın Wells Skorları ve Doppler ultrason sonuçları retrospektif olarak incelenmiştir. Çalışmaya bir haftadan uzun şikayetleri olan hastalar ve daha önce DVT tanısı alarak klinik takipte bulunan hastalar alınmamıştır. Hastaların Doppler ultrason ve Wells skorlaması aynı gün içinde yapılmıştır. Her iki yöntemle değerlendirilen hasta grubunda DVT prevalansı hesaplanmış, Doppler ultrason bulguları altın standart kabul edilerek Wells skorlamasının sensitivite ve spesifite değerleri hesaplanmıştır. Bu değerlerin hesaplanmasında skor eşikleri kullanılmıştır.Bulgular: Çalışmaya alınan 149 hasta içinden diz üstü Doppler ultrason inceleme ile 75 hastada DVT saptanmıştır. Buna göre Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Kliniği tarafından seçilmiş olan DVT ön tanılı hasta grubu içinde DVT prevalansı %50,3dür. Yüksek risk skorunun DVTyi öngörme konusundaki sensitivite ve spesifitesi (sırasıyla) %61,3 ve %60,8dir. Yüksek ve ara risk skorunun birlikte DVTyi öngörme konusundaki sensitivite ve spesifitesi (sırasıyla) %92 ve %43,2dir. Yüksek olasılıklı (skor?2) ve düşük olasılıklı (skor

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYKAN, A. H., KARAÇELİK, M., KARACA, T., BİLGİN, B. Ç., KORKMAZ, K., GEDİK, H. S., KANTARCI, U. H., YENER, A. Ü. (2022). Comparison of wells scores with doppler ultrasound in deep vein thrombosis. Damar Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1, 104–109. https://ajindex.com/articles/486759

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Hamper UM, DeJong MR, Scoutt LM. Ultrasound evaluation of the lower extremity veins. Radiol Clin North Am 2007;45(3):525-47, ix. White RH. The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism. Circulation. 2003;107(23 Suppl 1):I4-8. Silverstein MD, Heit JA, Mohr DN, Petterson TM, O'Fallon WM, Melton LJ 3rd. Trends in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a 25-year populationbased study. Arch Intern Med 1998;158(6): 585-93.
  2. Hirsh J, Bates SM. Prognosis in acute pulmonary embolism. Lancet 1999;353(9162): 1375-6.
  3. Fedullo PF, Auger WR, Channick RN, Kerr KM, Rubin LJ. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Clin Chest Med 2001; 22(3):561-81.
  4. Pengo V, Lensing AW, Prins MH, Marchiori A, Davidson BL, Tiozzo F, et al. Incidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 2004;350(22):2257-64.
  5. Kahn SR, Ginsberg JS. Relationship between deep venous thrombosis and the postthrombotic syndrome. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164(1):17-26.
  6. Anderson FA Jr, Spencer FA. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Circulation 2003; 107(23 Suppl 1):I9-16. Wells PS, Hirsh J, Anderson DR, Lensing AW, Foster G, Kearon C, et al. Accuracy of clinical assessment of deep-vein thrombosis. Lancet 1995;345(8961):1326-30.
  7. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, Forgie M, Kearon C, Dreyer J, et al. Evaluation of DDimer in the diagnosis of suspected deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 2003;349(13):122735. Goodacre S, Sampson F, Stevenson M, Wailoo A, Sutton A, Thomas S, et al. Meas- urement of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of non-invasive diagnostic testing strategies for deep vein thrombosis. Health Technol Assess 2006;10(15):1-168, iii-iv. Wang B, Lin Y, Pan FS, Yao C, Zheng ZY, Cai D, et al. Comparison of empirical estimate of clinical pretest probability with the Wells score for diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2013;24(1):76-81.
  8. Tick LW, Ton E, van Voorthuizen T, Hovens MM, Leeuwenburgh I, Lobatto S, et al. Practical diagnostic management of patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis by clinical probability test, compression ultrasonography, and D-dimer test. Am J Med 2002;113(8):630-5.
  9. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Bormanis J, Guy F, Mitchell M, Gray L, et al. Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep-vein thrombosis in clinical management. Lancet 1997;350 (9094):1795-8.