Journals / Damar Cerrahi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2

Modifiye hızlandırılmış teknik ile tamamen implante edilebilir venöz erişim analizi

Analysis of totally implantable venous access with modified fast track technique

Pages
39–44
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The mean duration of the surgical procedure for the cephalic cut-down technique was 14 min (range, 10 to 22 min) and 32 min (range, 25 to 50 min) for the percutaneous Seldinger technique.Conclusion: Our study results show that percutaneous Seldinger technique extends the time of TIVAP implantation and, therefore, TIVAP implantation with fast cephalic cut-down technique reduces both the duration of the procedure and serious complication rates such as pneumothorax

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: In this study, we present our experience with fast track technique modifying the cut-down model for totally implantable venous access.Patients and methods: Between June 2013 and December 2016, a total of 70 patients (33 males, 37 females; mean age 67.7±9.8 years, range 21 to 86 years) in whom a venous port was implanted were retrospectively analyzed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:All patients were evaluated in terms of surgery time, early and late complications, and primary success rate and classified on the basis of totally implantable venous access port (TIVAP) technique.Results: The primary success rate of fast-track TIVAP implantation was 91% (64/70) for the cephalic cut-down technique and 100% (6/6) for the Seldinger technique.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The mean duration of the surgical procedure for the cephalic cut-down technique was 14 min (range, 10 to 22 min) and 32 min (range, 25 to 50 min) for the percutaneous Seldinger technique.Conclusion: Our study results show that percutaneous Seldinger technique extends the time of TIVAP implantation and, therefore, TIVAP implantation with fast cephalic cut-down technique reduces both the duration of the procedure and serious complication rates such as pneumothorax
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: In this study, we present our experience with fast track technique modifying the cut-down model for totally implantable venous access.Patients and methods: Between June 2013 and December 2016, a total of 70 patients (33 males, 37 females; mean age 67.7±9.8 years, range 21 to 86 years) in whom a venous port was implanted were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were evaluated in terms of surgery time, early and late complications, and primary success rate and classified on the basis of totally implantable venous access port (TIVAP) technique.Results: The primary success rate of fast-track TIVAP implantation was 91% (64/70) for the cephalic cut-down technique and 100% (6/6) for the Seldinger technique. No major intraoperative complications related to the procedures were seen. The mean duration of the surgical procedure for the cephalic cut-down technique was 14 min (range, 10 to 22 min) and 32 min (range, 25 to 50 min) for the percutaneous Seldinger technique.Conclusion: Our study results show that percutaneous Seldinger technique extends the time of TIVAP implantation and, therefore, TIVAP implantation with fast cephalic cut-down technique reduces both the duration of the procedure and serious complication rates such as pneumothorax

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada tamamen implante edilebilir venöz erişim için cut-down modelini modifiye ederek hızlandırılmış tekniğe ilişkin deneyimlerimiz sunuldu.Hastalar ve Yöntemler: Haziran 2013 - Aralık 2016 tarihleri arasında venöz port yerleştirilen toplam 70 hasta (33 erkek, 37 kadın; ort. yaş 67.7±9.8 yıl; dağılım, 21-86 yaş) retrospektif olarak incelendi. Hastalar tamamen implante edilebilir venöz erişim portu (TIVAP) tekniğine göre değerlendirildi ve sınıflandırıldı. Hastaların tümü ameliyat süresi, erken ve geç komplikasyonlar ve primer başarı oranı açısından değerlendirildi ve tamamen TIVAP tekniğine göre sınıflandırıldı.Bulgular: TIVAP implantasyonunun birincil başarı oranı, hızlı sefalik cut-down tekniği için %91 (64/70) ve Seldinger tekniği için %100 (6/6) idi. İşlemlere ilişkin işlem sırası majör bir komplikasyon görülmedi. Cerrahi işlemin sefalik cut-down tekniği için ortalama süresi 14 dk. (dağılım, 10-22 dk.), perkütan Seldinger tekniği için 32 dk. (dağılım, 25-50 dk.) idi.Sonuç: Çalışma sonuçlarımız perkütan Seldinger tekniğinin TIVAP implantasyon süresini uzattığını ve bu nedenle hızlı sefalik cut-down tekniği ile yapılan TIVAP implantasyonunun işlem süresini kısalttığını ve pnömotoraks gibi ciddi komplikasyon oranlarını azalttığını göstermektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

DEŞER, S. B., DEMİRAĞ, M. K. (2022). Modifiye hızlandırılmış teknik ile tamamen implante edilebilir venöz erişim analizi. Damar Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2, 39–44. https://ajindex.com/articles/486634

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Niederhuber JE, Ensminger W, Gyves JW, Liepman M, Doan K, Cozzi E. Totally implanted venous and arterial access system to replace external catheters in cancer treatment. Surgery 1982;92:706-12
  2. Sakamoto N, Arai Y, Takeuchi Y, Takahashi M, Tsurusaki M, Sugimuta K. Ultrasound-Guided Radiological Placement of Central Venous Port via the Subclavian Vein: A Retrospective Analysis of 500 Cases at a Single Institute. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2010;33:989-94
  3. Kurul S, Saip P, Aydin T. Totally implantable venousaccess ports: local problems and extravasation injury. Lancet Oncol 2002;3:684-92
  4. Kock HJ, Pietsch M, Krause U, Wilke H, Eigler FW. Implantable vascular access systems: experience in 1500 patients with totally implanted central venous port systems. World J Surg 1998;22:12-6
  5. Lin YC, Chu CH, Ou KW, Chan DC, Hsieh CB, Chen TW, et al. Use of a totally implantable access port through the external jugular vein when the cephalic vein approach is not feasible. Ann Vasc Surg 2011;25:217-21
  6. Grant JD, Stevens SM, Woller SC, Lee EW, Kee ST, Liu DM, et al. Diagnosis and management of upper extremity deep-vein thrombosis in adults. Thromb Haemost 2012;108:1097-108
  7. Hung MC, Chen CJ, Wu KG, Hung GY, Lin YJ, Tang RB. Subcutaneously implanted central venous access device infection in pediatric patients with cancer. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2009;42:166-71
  8. Cotogni P, Pittiruti M, Barbero C, Monge T, Palmo A, Boggio Bertinet D. Catheter-related complications in cancer patients on home parenteral nutrition: a prospective study of over 51,000 catheter days. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2013;37:375-83
  9. Krupski G, Fröschle GW, Weh FJ, Schlosser GA. Central venous access devices in treatment of patients with malignant tumors: venous port, central venous catheter and Hickman catheter. Cost-benefit analysis based on a critical review of the literature, personal experiences with 135 port implantations and patient attitude. Chirurg 1995;66:202-7. [Abstract] 10. Groeger JS, Lucas AB, Thaler HT, Friedlander-Klar H, Brown AE, Kiehn TE, et al. Infectious morbidity associated with long-term use of venous access devices in patients with cancer. Ann Intern Med 1993;119:1168-74
  10. Groeger JS, Lucas AB, Thaler HT, Friedlander-Klar H, Brown AE, Kiehn TE, et al. Infectious morbidity associated with long-term use of venous access devices in patients with cancer. Ann Intern Med 1993;119:1168-74
  11. Beşirli K, Demirkaya A, Demirbaş MY, Kılıç Z. “Pinchoff syndrome