These patients were divided into two groups as Group 1 (endovascular aneurysm repair [EVAR] group; n=187) and Group 2 (open surgery [OS] group; n=146).Results: The mean age was higher in Group 1, compared to Group 2 (p
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: In this study, we present our clinical approach to the last five-year elective infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (iAAA) and our short-term results.Patients and methods: Data of a total of 333 patients (308 males, 25 females: mean age 70.6±6.6 years; range, 54 to 87 years) who were intervened with the diagnosis of an elective iAAA in Cardiovascular Surgery clinic of our hospital between January 2012 and January 2017 were retrospectively analyzed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Objectives: In this study, we present our clinical approach to the last five-year elective infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (iAAA) and our short-term results.Patients and methods: Data of a total of 333 patients (308 males, 25 females: mean age 70.6±6.6 years; range, 54 to 87 years) who were intervened with the diagnosis of an elective iAAA in Cardiovascular Surgery clinic of our hospital between January 2012 and January 2017 were retrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These patients were divided into two groups as Group 1 (endovascular aneurysm repair [EVAR] group; n=187) and Group 2 (open surgery [OS] group; n=146).Results: The mean age was higher in Group 1, compared to Group 2 (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
Objectives: In this study, we present our clinical approach to the last five-year elective infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (iAAA) and our short-term results.Patients and methods: Data of a total of 333 patients (308 males, 25 females: mean age 70.6±6.6 years; range, 54 to 87 years) who were intervened with the diagnosis of an elective iAAA in Cardiovascular Surgery clinic of our hospital between January 2012 and January 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. These patients were divided into two groups as Group 1 (endovascular aneurysm repair [EVAR] group; n=187) and Group 2 (open surgery [OS] group; n=146).Results: The mean age was higher in Group 1, compared to Group 2 (p
Özet
Amaç: Bu çalışmada elektif infrarenal abdominal aort anevrizmasına (iAAA) son beş yıldaki klinik yaklaşımımız ve erken dönem sonuçlarımız sunuldu.Hastalar ve Yöntemler: Hastanemizin Kalp ve Damar Cerrahisi kliniğinde Ocak 2012 - Ocak 2017 tarihleri arasında elektif iAAA tanısı ile girişim yapılan toplam 333 hastanın (308 erkek, 25 kadın; ort. yaş 70.6±6.6 yıl; dağılım, 54-87 yıl) verileri retrospektif olarak incelendi. Bu hastalar Grup 1 (endovasküler anevrizma tamiri [EVAR] grubu; n=187) ve Grup 2 (açık cerrahi [AC] grubu; n=146) olarak iki gruba ayrıldı.Bulgular: Grup 2'ye kıyasla Grup 1'in yaş ortalaması daha yüksek bulundu (p
🔖
Cite This Article
SARICAOĞLU, M. C., BİRİNCİOĞLU, C. L., ÜNAL, E. U., İŞCAN, H. Z., AYTEKİN, B., YİĞİT, G., TÜRKCAN, B. S., AKKAYA, B., CİVELEK, İ., ÖZBEK, H. M., TÜTÜN, U. (2022). Our clinical approach to the last five-year elective infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm: Short-term results. Damar Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1, 1–7. https://ajindex.com/articles/486607
Woo EY, Damrauer SM. Abdominal aortic aneurysms: Open surgical treatment. In: Cronenwett JL, Johnston KW, editors. Rutherford’s Vascular Surgery. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2014. p. 2041
Tarride JE, Blackhouse G, De Rose G, Novick T, Bowen JM, Hopkins R, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of elective endovascular repair compared with open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms for patients at a high surgical risk: A 1-year patient-level analysis conducted in Ontario, Canada. J Vasc Surg 2008;48:779-87
Volodos NL. Historical perspective: The first steps in endovascular aortic repair: how it all began. J Endovasc Ther 2013;20:3-23
Demicheli E, Ferreira LM, Parodi JC. History of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. In: Dardik A, editor. Vascular Surgery. Switzerland: Springer; 2017. p. 15-20
Stather PW, Sidloff D, Dattani N, Choke E, Bown MJ, Sayers RD. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the early and late outcomes of open and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg 2013;100:863-72
Steyerberg EW, Kievit J, de Mol Van Otterloo JC, van Bockel JH, Eijkemans MJ, Habbema JD. Perioperative mortality of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. A clinical prediction rule based on literature and individual patient data. Arch Intern Med 1995;155:1998-2004
Patel R, Sweeting MJ, Powell JT, Greenhalgh RM. Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in 15-years’ follow-up of the UK endovascular aneurysm repair trial 1 (EVAR trial 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016;388:2366-74. 8. van Schaik TG, de Bruin J, van Sambeek M, Verhagen H, Prinssen M, Grobbee R, et al. Very long-term followup (12-15 Years) of the dutch randomized endovascular aneurysm repair management (DREAM) Trial. J Vasc Surg 2016;63(Suppl):143S
Lederle FA, Freischlag JA, Kyriakides TC, Matsumura JS, Padberg FT Jr, Kohler TR, et al. Long-term comparison of endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med 2012;367:1988-97
Becquemin JP, Pillet JC, Lescalie F, Sapoval M, Goueffic Y, Lermusiaux P, et al. A randomized controlled trial of endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms in low- to moderate-risk patients. J Vasc Surg 2011;53:1167-73
Brewster DC. Do current results of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair justify more widespread use? Surgery 2002;131:363-7
Anderson JL, Halperin JL, Albert NM, Bozkurt B, Brindis RG, Curtis LH,