Journals / Damar Cerrahi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3

Is the ankle-brachial index directly associated with current glycemic control in diabetic patients?

Ayak bileği-brakiyal indeksi diyabetik hastalarda mevcut glisemik kontrolle doğrudan ilişkili midir?

Pages
117–123
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The HbA1c value was lower in the group whose ABI values were higher.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: In this study, we aimed to investigate the association between the ankle-brachial index (ABI) and glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and methods: This cross-sectional study included a total of 136 (41 males, 95 females; mean age 54.4±8.4 years; range, 33 to 76 years) type 2 diabetic patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The HbA1c value was lower in the group whose ABI values were higher.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: In this study, we aimed to investigate the association between the ankle-brachial index (ABI) and glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients. Patients and methods: This cross-sectional study included a total of 136 (41 males, 95 females; mean age 54.4±8.4 years; range, 33 to 76 years) type 2 diabetic patients. Demographic, metabolic characteristics, laboratory data and vascular complication status of the patients were recorded. For the ABI measurement, blood pressure on ankle posterior tibialis artery was measured using hand Doppler. Results: The mean duration of diabetes was 118.6±89.2 months and the mean HbA1c value was 8.03±1.7%. According to the ABI values, only one patient was in the ABI 1.4 (high) group. According to the HbA1c values (9%), the ABI value was not statistically significantly different (p=0.472). The ABI value was only correlated with triglyceride (r= -0.173 p=0.049), total cholesterol (r= -0.214 p=0.014), and glomerular filtration rate (r=0.248 p=0.006). The mean HbA1c value was 8.3% in the group whose ABI value was between 0.9-1.4, while the mean HbA1c level value was 7.5% in the group whose ABI value was ABI >1.4 (p=0.01). Conclusion: In our study, the ABI value was not found to be correlated with the HbA1c value. The HbA1c value was lower in the group whose ABI values were higher.

Özet

ÖZAmaç: Bu çalışmada tip 2 diyabetik hastalarda Ayak bileği-brakiyal indeksinin (ABİ) glisemik kontrolle ilişkisi değerlendirildi.Hastalar ve Yöntemler: Bu kesitsel çalışmaya tip 2 diyabeti olan toplam 136 (41 erkek, 95 kadın; ort. yaş 54.4±8.4 yıl; dağılım, 33-76 yıl)hasta alındı. Hastaların demografik, metabolik özellikleri ve laboratuvar verileri ve komplikasyon durumları kaydedildi. Ayak bileğibrakiyalindeks ölçümü için ayak bileği posterior tibial arterden kan basıncı el Doppleri kullanılarak ölçüldü.Bulgular: Ortalama diyabet süresi 118.6±89.2 ay ve ortalama HbA1c değeri %8.03±1.7 idi. Ayak bileği-brakiyal indeks değerlerine göre,yalnızca bir hasta ABİ 1.4 (yüksek) grubundaydı.HbA1c değerlerine göre (HbA1c; %9) ABİ değerleri istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde farklı değildi (p=0.472). ABİ değeriyalnızca trigliserid (r= -0.173 p=0.049), total kolesterol (r= -0.214 p=0.014) ve glomerüler filtrasyon hızı (r= 0.248 p=0.006) ile ilişkilibulundu. ABİ değeri 0.9-1.4 olan grupta ortalama HbA1c değeri %8.3 iken, ABİ değeri >1.4 olan grupta ortalama HbA1c değeri %7.5 idi(p=0.01).Sonuç: Çalışmamızda ABİ değeri HbA1c değeri ile ilişkili bulunmadı. Yüksek ABİ değeri olan grupta HbA1c değeri daha düşük bulundu.

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜREKLİ, B. Ş., KOCABAŞ, G. Ü., MİRİLİ, C., ÇAKIR, H., YÜREKLİ, İ. (2022). Is the ankle-brachial index directly associated with current glycemic control in diabetic patients?. Damar Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3, 117–123. https://ajindex.com/articles/486600

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Choi SH, Chae A, Miller E, Messig M, Ntanios F, DeMaria AN, et al. Relationship between biomarkers of oxidized low-density lipoprotein, statin therapy, quantitative coronary angiography, and atheroma: volume observations from the REVERSAL (Reversal of Atherosclerosis with Aggressive Lipid Lowering) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:24-32.
  2. Mostaza JM, Suarez C, Manzano L, Cairols M, LópezFernández F, Aguilar I, et al. Sub-clinical vascular disease in type 2 diabetic subjects: relationship with chronic complications of diabetes and the presence of cardiovascular disease risk factors. Eur J Intern Med 2008;19:255-60.
  3. Bendermacher BL, Teijink JA, Willigendael EM, Bartelink ML, Peters RJ, Langenberg M, et al. Applicability of the ankle-brachial-index measurement as screening device for high cardiovascular risk: an observational study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2012;12:59. Balkanay OO, Ömeroğlu SN. Approach to peripheral arterial disease in the elderly. [Article in Turkish] Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars 2017;45(Suppl 5):96-101.
  4. Lijmer JG, Hunink MG, van den Dungen JJ, Loonstra J, Smit AJ. ROC analysis of noninvasive tests for peripheral arterial disease. Ultrasound Med Biol 1996;22:391-8.
  5. Leng GC, Fowkes FG, Lee AJ, Dunbar J, Housley E, Ruckley CV. Use of ankle brachial pressure index to predict cardiovascular events and death: a cohort study. BMJ 1996;313:1440-4.
  6. Schaper NC, Andros G, Apelqvist J, Bakker K, Lammer J, Lepantalo M, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of peripheral arterial disease in diabetic patients with a foot ulcer. A progress report of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2012;28 Suppl 1:218-24.
  7. Resnick HE, Lindsay RS, McDermott MM, Devereux RB, Jones KL, Fabsitz RR, et al. Relationship of high and low ankle brachial index to all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality: the Strong Heart Study. Circulation 2004;109:733-9. National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis 2002;39(2 Suppl 1):S1-266. Dziemidok P, Szcześniak G, Kostrzewa-Zabłocka E, Paprzycki P, Korzon-Burakowska A. Is the advancement of diabetic angiopathy evaluated as ankle-brachial index directly associated with current glycaemic control? Ann Agric Environ Med 2012;19:563-6. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK P