Journals / Çukurova Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 4

Are We Successful in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation?

Kardiyopulmoner Resüsitasyon’da Başarılı mıyız?

Pages
601–609
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Total 15 (5%) of allpatients included to the study were discharged in good health.Conclusion: The lower rate of success in cardiopulmonary resuscitation showed the presence of defects in all stages ofthe chain of life, and suggests that some actions should be performed to correct them.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: In this study, we aimed to determine the success rate of cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed in thepatients with diagnosis of cardiac arrest, and demographic characteristics of these patients.Material and Methods: The patients admitted to Adana Numune Education and Research Hospital, Department ofEmergency Medicine between 01.01.2011 and 31.12.2012, and who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation wereincluded to this study planned as retrospectively.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The age, gender, status of judicial cases, causes and time of cardiacarrest, first observed arrest rhythm, the diseases prior to the arrest, means of arrival to emergency department, durationof cardiopulmonary resuscitation, results of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the name of the hospitalised clinic, theexistence of the operation, and outcome of the patients who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation in accordancewith current advanced life support protocols were recorded in standard data entry form.Results: A total of 290 patients with completely accessible data were included to the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Total 15 (5%) of allpatients included to the study were discharged in good health.Conclusion: The lower rate of success in cardiopulmonary resuscitation showed the presence of defects in all stages ofthe chain of life, and suggests that some actions should be performed to correct them.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: In this study, we aimed to determine the success rate of cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed in thepatients with diagnosis of cardiac arrest, and demographic characteristics of these patients.Material and Methods: The patients admitted to Adana Numune Education and Research Hospital, Department ofEmergency Medicine between 01.01.2011 and 31.12.2012, and who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation wereincluded to this study planned as retrospectively. The age, gender, status of judicial cases, causes and time of cardiacarrest, first observed arrest rhythm, the diseases prior to the arrest, means of arrival to emergency department, durationof cardiopulmonary resuscitation, results of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the name of the hospitalised clinic, theexistence of the operation, and outcome of the patients who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation in accordancewith current advanced life support protocols were recorded in standard data entry form.Results: A total of 290 patients with completely accessible data were included to the study. Most of these patients weremen (65.2%). The mean ages were 61 ± 19 years for men, 67 ± 14 years for women (p = 0.018). The most commondiagnosis were ischemic heart disease and heart failure according to the analysis of the patient's medical history. 92patients (31.7%) were brought to the emergency department after death, and all of these patients were unsuccessfulfollowing to cardiopulmonary resuscitation. 198 patients (68.3%) had cardiac arrest in the emergency department, andwe determined that cardiopulmonary resuscitation application of 102 patients were successful. The most commoncauses of cardiac arrest were myocardial infarction and heart failure. Mostly first observed rhythm in the monitör wasasystole. The response rate of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients with ventricular fibrillation and ventriculartachycardia was higher. Most patients were hospitalised to the coronary intensive care unit, and 11 of the 21 patientswho underwent percutaneous coronary intervention were discharged from hospital in good health. Total 15 (5%) of allpatients included to the study were discharged in good health.Conclusion: The lower rate of success in cardiopulmonary resuscitation showed the presence of defects in all stages ofthe chain of life, and suggests that some actions should be performed to correct them.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada kardiyak arrest tanısı konulan hastalarda kardiyopulmoner resüsitasyon uygulamasındaki başarı oranının ve bu hastaların demografik özelliklerinin saptanması amaçlandı. Materyal ve Metod: Geriye dönük olarak yapılması planlanan çalışmaya Adana Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Acil Tıp Kliniği'ne 01.01.2011 ve 31.12.2012 tarihleri arasında başvuran ve kardiyopulmoner resüsitasyon uygulanan hastalar alındı. Güncel ileri yaşam desteği protokollerine uygun olarak kardiyopulmoner resüsitasyon uygulanan hastaların yaş, cinsiyet, adli olgu durumu, kardiyak arrest nedeni ve zamanı, arrestte ilk gözlenen ritm, arrest öncesinde var olan hastalığı, acil servise geliş şekli, kardiyopulmoner resüsitasyon süresi, acil kliniği'nde uygulanan kardiyopulmoner resüsitasyon'un sonucu, yattığı klinik, operasyon varlığı, hastaların sonlanımı standart veri giriş formuna kaydedildi. Bulgular: Verilerine eksiksiz ulaşabildiğimiz toplam 290 hasta çalışmaya alındı. Bu hastaların çoğu erkekti (% 65.2). Yaş ortalaması erkeklerde 61 ± 19 yıl, kadınlarda ise 67 ± 14 yıl idi (p=0.018). Hastaların özgeçmişleri incelendiğinde en sık iskemik kalp hastalığı ve kalp yetmezliği tanısı aldıkları saptandı. Hastaların 92'sinin (% 31.7) acil servise ölü duhul olarak getirildiği, ve bu hastaların hiçbirinde kardiyopulmoner resüsitasyon'da başarılı olunamadığı belirlendi. Hastaların 198'inin (% 68.3) acil serviste arrest olduğu ve 102'sinde kardiyopulmoner resüsitasyon uygulamasında başarılı olunduğu tespit edildi. En sık kardiyak arrest nedenleri miyokard infarktüsü ve kalp yetmezliği idi. Monitörde ilk gözlenen ritm en fazla asistoli idi. Ventriküler fibrilasyon ve ventriküler taşikardi olan hastalarda kardiyopulmoner resüsitasyona cevap oranı daha yüksek bulundu. Hastaların en fazla koroner yoğun bakım ünitesi'ne yatırıldığı ve perkütan koroner girişim yapılan 21 hastanın 11'inin şifa ile taburcu edildiği belirlendi. Çalışmaya dahil edilen tüm hastaların toplam 15'inin (% 5) şifa ile taburcu edildiği tespit edildi. Sonuç: Kardiyopulmoner resüsitasyon'da başarı oranının düşük olması kardiyopulmoner resüsitasyon yaşam zincirinin tüm basamaklarında aksaklıklar olduğunu, düzeltmeye yönelik adımlar atılması gerektiğini göstermektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

AKTÜRK, A., SATAR, S., İÇME, F., KOZACI, N., AY, M. O. (2022). Are We Successful in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation?. Çukurova Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 4, 601–609. https://ajindex.com/articles/486218

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Field JM, Hazinski MF, Sayre MR, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, Hemphill R et al. Part 1: executive summary: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2010; 122: 640-56
  2. Şener S, Yaylacı S. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care guideline "Two guidelines and important changes to daily practice". Turk J Emerg Med. 2010; 10: 199-208
  3. Ornato JP. Sudden Cardiac Death. In Tintinalli’s Emergency Medicine: Resuscitation, 7th Ed (Eds Tintinalli JE, Stapczynski JS, Cline DM, Ma OJ, Cydulka RK, Meckler GD): New York, McGraw-Hill, 2010; 63-7
  4. Çertuğ A. Avrupa Resüsitasyon Konseyi 2010 Resüsitasyon Kılavuzu’ndaki Temel Değişiklikler. Anestezi Dergisi. 2011; 19: 1–14
  5. Tanrıover MD. Recognizing the Deteriorating Patient Prior to Cardiac Arrest: Predictive Criteria and Risk Factors. Yoğun Bakım Derg. 2011; 1: 16-20
  6. Fredriksson M, Aune S, Bång A, Thorén AB, Lindqvist J, Karlsson T et al. Cardiac arrest outside and inside hospital in a community: mechanisms behind the differences in outcome and outcome in relation to time of arrest. Am Heart J. 2010; 159: 749- 56
  7. Sasson C, Rogers MAM, Dahl J, Kellermann AL. Predictors of Survival From Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010; 3: 63-81
  8. Leong BSH. Bystander CPR and survival Singapore Med J. 2011; 52: 573
  9. Berg RA, Hemphill R, Abella BS, Aufderheide TP, Cave DV, Hazinski MF et al. Part 5: adult basic life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2010; 122; 685- 705
  10. Meaney PA, Nadkarni VM, Kern KB, Indik JH, Halperin HR, Berg RA. Rhythms and outcomes of adult in-hospital cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med 2010; 38:101-8
  11. Oğuztürk H, Turtay MG, Tekin YK, Sarıhan E. Acil Serviste Gerçekleşen Kardiyak Arrestler ve Kardiyopulmoner Resüsitasyon Deneyimlerimiz. Kafkas J Med Sci. 2011; 1:114–117
  12. Neumar RW, Otto CW, Link MS, Kronick SL, Shuster M, Callaway CW et al. Part 8: Adult Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2010; 122: 729-67
  13. Peberdy MA, Callaway CW, Neumar RW, Geocadin RG, Zimmerman JL, Donnino M et al. Part 9: PostCardiac Arrest Care: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary