SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dicle Tıp Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 1

The Measurement of Neutrophil Gelatinase Associated Lipocalin in Umbilical Cord Blood and the Assessment of Its Relationship with Neonatal Results

Dicle Üniversitesi Yanık Merkezinde 2011-2020 Yılları Arasında Tedavi Edilen Yanık Hastalarının Epidemiyolojik Olarak İncelenmesi

Mehmet Fatih AKKOÇ
Mehmet ÖZDEMİR
Pages
229–235
Publication Date
2022-03-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, studies on larger patient populations are needed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: In this study, the relationship of cord blood Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin (NGAL) with neonatal diseases was investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: NGAL levels were measured in the cord blood of 180 babies born between 2015 and 2016.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, studies on larger patient populations are needed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Epidemiyolojik çalışma · Yanık tedavisi · Yanık

Abstract

Objectives: In this study, the relationship of cord blood Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin (NGAL) with neonatal diseases was investigated. Methods: NGAL levels were measured in the cord blood of 180 babies born between 2015 and 2016. Patients were classified according to maternal diseases, neonatal diseases and demographic characteristics. Obtained data were compared with cord blood NGAL levels. Results: In our study, the mean NGAL levels were 1283.99 ng/mL in boys and 1306.52 ng/mL in girls. Umbilical cord blood NGAL levels of infants diagnosed with intrauterine growth retardation (1913.4±2833.5 ng/mL) and prolonged premature rupture of membranes (2594.2±2037.1 ng/mL) were found to be statistically high (p0.05). Conclusions: Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin, may be useful as a diagnostic biomarker in the evaluation of maternal and neonatal diseases. However, studies on larger patient populations are needed.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı 2011 yılının Ocak ayından 2020 yılının Aralık ayı bitimine kadar, yanık merkezimizde tedavi edilen yanık hastalarına ait kayıtların epidemiyolojik olarak incelenmesidir. Yöntemler: Bu tanımlayıcı ve kesitsel türdeki çalışma Dicle Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Hastanesi Yanık Merkezinde, retrospektif olarak gerçekleştirildi. 2011-2020 yılları arasında yanık vakaları elektronik hasta kayıtlarından elde edildi ve incelendi. İstatistiksel analizler Statistical Package for Social Sciences for IBM 25 paket programı ile yapıldı. Veri değerlendirmesinde tanımlayıcı istatistik yöntemleri (sayı, yüzde ve aritmetik ortalama vb) ve ki kare testi kullanıldı. Bulgular: Çalışmamızın örneklemini oluşturan 3227 yanık hastasının %55,3’ü 1-5 yaş aralığında ve %52,5’inin erkek olduğu belirlendi. Vakaların %42,7’si 2011-2013 yılları arasında gerçekleşmiştir. Yanıkların %64,1’inin sıcak sıvı yanığı, %50,4’ünün ikinci derece yanık olduğu saptandı. En fazla yanık vakası 2011-2013’te görülmüş ve vakalar 2020’ye doğru azalma göstermiştir. Yanık yaralanmasından en çok etkilenen yaş aralığının 1-5 arası ve en yüksek oranda yanık nedeninin sıcak sıvılar olduğu belirlendi (χ2 =5,560, p

🔖

Cite This Article

AKKOÇ, M. F., ÖZDEMİR, M. (2022). The Measurement of Neutrophil Gelatinase Associated Lipocalin in Umbilical Cord Blood and the Assessment of Its Relationship with Neonatal Results. Dicle Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 1, 229–235. https://ajindex.com/articles/484882

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Chinweuba AU, Chinweuba IS, Diorgu FC, et al. Economic burden of moderate to severe burns and its association with health-related quality of life of Nigerian women. BMC women's health. 2021; 21(1): 1- 13
  2. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. The Global Burden of Disease: 2010 Update. IHME, Seattle. www.healthmetricsandevaluation.org/gbd-compare/ (Accessed 7 June 2020)
  3. World Health Organization. Burns. Published March 6, 2018. Accessed May 25, 2020. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/ factsheets/fs365/en/ 4. American Burn Association. Burn incidence and treatment in the United States: 2016. Accessed May 25, 2020. http:// ameriburn.org/who-we are/media/burn-incidence-fact-sheet/ 5. Schmid DM. The National Law Review: Burn injuries: statistics, classifications, & causes. Stark & Stark. Personal Injury Law Journal. Published December 17, 2015. Accessed May 25, 2020. https://www.natlawreview.com/article/burn injuriesstatistics-classifications-causes 6. WHO. Burns. https://www.who.int/news room/fact-sheets/detail/burns (6 March 2018). (Accessed 24 Aug 2020)
  4. Abazari M, Ghaffari A, Rashidzadeh H, et al. A Systematic Review on Classification, Identification, and Healing Process of Burn Wound Healing. The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds, 2020. 1534734620924857
  5. Andrews CJ, Cuttle L. Comparing the reported burn conditions for different severity burns in porcine models: a systematic review. International wound journal. 2017; 14(6): 1199-1212
  6. Aytaç S, Özgenel GY, Selçuk A, et al. Güney Marmara Bölgesindeki çocuklarda yanık epidemiyolojisi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2004; 30(3): 145- 149
  7. Çıkman M, Çandar M, Kandiş H, Baltacı D, Sarıtaş A. The Factors Affecting Mortality In Adults Due To High Voltage Electrical Injuries. 2011; 13(3):29-33
  8. Akkoç MF, Bülbüloğlu S, Özdemir M. The Effects of Lockdown Measures due to COVID 19 Pandemic on Burn Cases. International Wound Journal. 2021; 18: 367–374
  9. Pruit BA, Mason AD. Epidemiological demographic ad outcome characteristics of burn injury. Herndon DN. Total burn care. London: W.B. Saunders. 2012: 15- 46
  10. Günay K, Taviloğlu K, Eskioğlu E, et al. A study of epidemiology and mortality in burn patients. Turkish Journal of Travma and Emergency Surgery. 1995; 2: 205-208
  11. Çıkman M, Çandar M, Kandiş H, et al. Retrospective Analysis of Judicial Burn Cases Admitted to Our Clinic: 4-Year Experience. Düzce Medicine Faculty Journal, 2011; 13(3): 29-33
  12. Özkan Z