Journals / İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 82 - Sayı: 3

RETROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF CHANGING RATES FOR OPERATIVE VAGINAL DELIVERY OVER THE DECADES IN A SINGLE TERTIARY HEALTH CARE CENTER

ÜÇÜNCÜ BASAMAK BİR MERKEZDEKİ OPERATİF VAJİNAL DOĞUM SIKLIĞININ DEKATLAR ARASINDAKİ DEĞİŞİMİNİN RETROSPEKTİF OLARAK İNCELENMESİ

Pages
139–143
Publication Date
2019-07-16
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Supporting OVD practices and increasing the number of physicians with sufficient experience in this area may contribute to reducing the increased cesarean section frequency.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To evaluate the changing rates for operative vaginal delivery (OVD) over the decades in our institution.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 10458 births in 1976, 1986, 1996, 2006 and 2016 were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Supporting OVD practices and increasing the number of physicians with sufficient experience in this area may contribute to reducing the increased cesarean section frequency.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Operatif vajinal doğum · sezaryen · vakum

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the changing rates for operative vaginal delivery (OVD) over the decades in our institution. Material and Methods: This is a retrospective and descriptive study. A total of 10458 births in 1976, 1986, 1996, 2006 and 2016 were included in the study. Cases were divided into five groups according to years of delivery: group 1 (1976, n=2668), group 2 (1986, n=2393), group 3 (1996, n=1751), group 4 (2006, n=1751), and group 5 (2016, n=1895). The percentage of total operative deliveries, the percentage of births with forceps, the percentage of vacuum extractions and the percentage of births by cesarean were compared between the study years. Results: The frequency of OVD was 16.4%, 17.1%, 5.1%, 1.9% and 0% in 1976, 1986, 1996, 2006 and 2016, respectively. The frequency of forceps applications in OVDs was 99.3%, 99.58%, 99.83%, 99.94% and 0%, respectively. The caesarean rates in the study years were 11.4%, 19.2%, 44.7%, 69.3% and 77.9%, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in the percentage of total operative deliveries, percentage of births with forceps, percentage of vacuum extractions, and percentage of cesarean delivery (p<0.001). Conclusion: As in the rest of the world, OVD applications within the decades have decreased dramatically, and cesarean delivery has increased significantly. Supporting OVD practices and increasing the number of physicians with sufficient experience in this area may contribute to reducing the increased cesarean section frequency.

Özet

Amaç: Kliniğimizdeki operatif vajinal doğum (OVD) sıklığının, dekatlar içerisindeki değişimini incelemektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Mevcut çalışma retrospektif ve tanımlayıcı bir araştırmadır. Çalışmaya 1976, 1986, 1996, 2006 ve 2016 yıllarında gerçekleşmiş olan toplam 10458 doğum dahil edilmiştir. Vakalar doğumun gerçekleştiği yıllara göre beş gruba ayrılmıştır: grup 1 (1976, n=2668), grup 2 (1986, n=2393), grup 3 (1996, n=1751), grup 4 (2006, n=1751) ve grup 5 (2016, n=1895). Çalışma yılları arasında toplam operatif doğumların yüzdesi, forseps ile doğumların yüzdesi, vakum ekstraksiyonlarının yüzdesi ve sezaryen ile doğumların yüzdesi karşılaştırılmıştır. Bulgular: OVD sıklığı 1976, 1986, 1996, 2006 ve 2016 yıllarında sırası ile %16,4, %17,1, %5,1, %1,9 ve %0 olarak bulunmuştur. OVD’lar içerisinde forseps uygulamalarının sıklığı çalışma yıllarına göre ise sırasıyla %99,3, %99,58, %99,83, %99,94 ve %0 olarak bulunmuştur. Çalışma yıllarındaki sezaryen oranları ise sırasıyla %11,4, %19,2, %44,7, %69,3 ve %77,9’dur. Çalışma yılları arasında toplam operatif doğumların yüzdesi, forseps ile doğumların yüzdesi, vakum ekstraksiyonlarının yüzdesi ve sezaryen ile doğumların yüzdesi açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark mevcuttur (p<0,001). Sonuç: Tüm dünyada olduğu gibi kliniğimizde dekatlar içerisinde OVD uygulamaları dramatik olarak azalmış, sezaryen ile doğum ise belirgin olarak artmıştır. OVD uygulamalarının desteklenmesi ve bu alanda yeterli tecrübeye sahip hekimlerin sayısının arttırılması artan sezaryen sıklığını azaltmaya katkıda bulunabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TANAÇAN, A., BEKSAÇ, M. S. (2019). RETROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF CHANGING RATES FOR OPERATIVE VAGINAL DELIVERY OVER THE DECADES IN A SINGLE TERTIARY HEALTH CARE CENTER. İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 82 - Sayı: 3, 139–143. https://ajindex.com/articles/48412

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 154: operative vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2015;126(1):56-65
  2. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ, Driscoll AK, Mathews TJ. Births: final data for 2015 Natl Vital Stat Rep 2017;66(1):1
  3. Clark SL, Belfort MA, Hankins GD, Meyers JA, Houser FM. Variation in the rates of operative delivery in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196(6): 526-1
  4. Ameh CA, Weeks AD. The role of instrumental vaginal delivery in low resource settings. BJOG 2009;116(Suppl. 1): 22-5
  5. Fauveau V. Is vacuum extraction still known, taught and practiced? A worldwide KAP survey. Int J Gyn Obstet 2006;94(2):185-9
  6. O’Mahony F, Hofmeyr GJ, Menon V. Choice of instruments for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;(11):CD005455
  7. Queenan JT. How to stop the relentless rise in cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118(2 Pt 1):199-200
  8. Beksac MS, Tanacan A, Bacak HO, Leblebicioglu K. Computerized prediction system for the route of delivery (vaginal birth versus cesarean section). J Perinat Med 2018;46(8):881-4
  9. Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;210(3):179-93
  10. Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom KD, Mercer BM, Saade GR. Preventing the first cesarean delivery: Summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver national institute of child health and human development, Society for MaternalFetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop. Obstet Gynecol 2012;120(5):1181
  11. Poignant M, Hjelmstedt A, Ekéus C. Indications for operative delivery between 1999-2010 and induction of labor and epidural analgesia on the risk of operative delivery–A population based Swedish register study. Sex Reprod Healthc 2012;3(4): 129-34
  12. Pfuntner A, Wier LM, Stocks C. Most Frequent Procedures Performed in U.S. Hospitals, 2011, Statistical Brief #165. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US). Khanna G, Mackay-Smith V, editor. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs. Rockville, MD; 2013. Bookshelf ID: NBK174682PMID: 24354027
  13. Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014. PloS one 2016;11(2): e0148343
  14. Demissie K, Rhoads G, Smulian JC, Balasubramanian BA, Gandhi K, Joseph KS, K